On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:17:05 +0400
Vladimir Davydov vdavy...@parallels.com wrote:
From: Glauber Costa glom...@openvz.org
During the past weeks, it became clear to us that the shrinker interface
we have right now works very well for some particular types of users,
but not that well for
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:31:02 +0400
Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the exact problem described above for a project I'm working on
and this solution seems to solve it well.
However, I had a few issues while trying to use this interface. I'll
comment on them below, but
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:03:32 -0500
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com wrote:
The answer for all of your questions above can be summarized by noting
that for the lack of other users (at the time), this patch does the bare
minimum
for memcg needs. I agree, for instance, that it would
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:46:05 +0400
Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:03:32 -0500
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com wrote:
The answer for all of your questions above can be
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:58:52 +0400
Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:46:05 +0400
Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino
I have the exact problem described above for a project I'm working on
and this solution seems to solve it well.
However, I had a few issues while trying to use this interface. I'll
comment on them below, but please take this more as advice seeking
than patch review.
This patch extends that
One correction:
int vmpressure_register_kernel_event(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
- void (*fn)(void))
+void (*fn)(void *data, int level), void
*data)
{
- struct vmpressure *vmpr = css_to_vmpressure(css);
+
On 12/20/2013 06:31 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
I have the exact problem described above for a project I'm working on
and this solution seems to solve it well.
However, I had a few issues while trying to use this interface. I'll
comment on them below, but please take this more as advice seeking
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:03:32 -0500
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com wrote:
The answer for all of your questions above can be summarized by noting
that for the lack of other users (at the time), this patch
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:46:05 +0400
Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:03:32 -0500
Luiz Capitulino
From: Glauber Costa glom...@openvz.org
During the past weeks, it became clear to us that the shrinker interface
we have right now works very well for some particular types of users,
but not that well for others. The latter are usually people interested
in one-shot notifications, that were forced
11 matches
Mail list logo
