On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:39:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
Well, in OpenVZ everything is in kernel/cpt/ and prefixed with cpt_
and rst_.
So?
We're not merging OpenVZ code _either_.
This is to give example of other prefixes: cpt_
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:26:50AM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 10:07:11PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
I'm curious how you see these fitting in with the work that we've been
doing with Oren. Do you mean to just start a discussion or are you
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 01:46:36AM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
Some meta comments about this patch set:
* Patches 1-9 are cleanups, unrelated to checkpoint/restart. They
deserve a separate thread.
They will be sent separatedly.
* You barely take locks or reference counts to objects that you
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
We're not merging OpenVZ code _either_.
This is to give example of other prefixes: cpt_ and rst_
Are they fine?
Do you secretly work for IBM?
IBM has a well-known disdain for vowels, and basically refuses to use them
for mnemonics (they
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
We're not merging OpenVZ code _either_.
This is to give example of other prefixes: cpt_ and rst_
Are they fine?
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5513.txt
Do you secretly work for IBM?
IBM has a well-known disdain for
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Randy Dunlap wrote:
So let's call it checkpoint and restore. Ok?
restart ?
Even better (and proving my point that trying to use contractions like
rst can be misleading, although I agree with Ingo that the most common
mistake would be reset)
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:08:21PM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:26:50AM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 10:07:11PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
I'm curious how you see these fitting
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 03:31:55PM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:08:21PM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:26:50AM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at
* not having CAP_SYS_ADMIN on restart(2)
Surely you have read already on the containers mailing list that
for the *time being* we attempt to get as far as possible without
requiring root privileges, to identify security hot-spots.
More or less everything is hotspot.
Going back to
Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobri...@gmail.com):
* not having CAP_SYS_ADMIN on restart(2)
Surely you have read already on the containers mailing list that
for the *time being* we attempt to get as far as possible without
requiring root privileges, to identify security hot-spots.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 08:06:55AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
This is to show how we see C/R and to provoke discussion on number of
important issues (mounts, ...).
My only initial reaction is that I absolutely hate the naming (not to say
I
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 10:07:11PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
I'm curious how you see these fitting in with the work that we've been
doing with Oren. Do you mean to just start a discussion or are you
really proposing these as an alternative to what Oren has been posting?
Yes, this is posted as
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 13:14 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
[1] Do I inderstand correctly that cookie for shared object is an
address on kernel stack? This is obviously unreliable, if yes :-)
int objref;
...
/* adding 'file' to the hash will keep a reference to
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 13:14 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 10:07:11PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
I'm curious how you see these fitting in with the work that we've been
doing with Oren. Do you mean to just start a discussion or are you
really proposing these as an
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
Well, in OpenVZ everything is in kernel/cpt/ and prefixed with cpt_
and rst_.
So?
We're not merging OpenVZ code _either_.
And I think cr_ is super nice prefix: it's short, it's C-like,
it reminds about restart part
It does no such thing.
* Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
Well, in OpenVZ everything is in kernel/cpt/ and prefixed with
cpt_ and rst_.
So?
We're not merging OpenVZ code _either_.
And I think cr_ is super nice prefix: it's short, it's
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 10:07:11PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
I'm curious how you see these fitting in with the work that we've been
doing with Oren. Do you mean to just start a discussion or are you
really proposing these as an alternative to what Oren has been
Some meta comments about this patch set:
* Patches 1-9 are cleanups, unrelated to checkpoint/restart. They
deserve a separate thread.
* You barely take locks or reference counts to objects that you
later refer to. What if something really bad happens ?
* (contd) If you don't take locks, then
* Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote:
This is to show how we see C/R and to provoke discussion on number
of important issues (mounts, ...).
This is small part of long-awaited to be cleanuped code.
It's able to restore busyloop on i386 and x86_64 and restore i386
busyloop on
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:28:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote:
This is to show how we see C/R and to provoke discussion on number
of important issues (mounts, ...).
This is small part of long-awaited to be cleanuped code.
It's able to
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
This is to show how we see C/R and to provoke discussion on number of
important issues (mounts, ...).
My only initial reaction is that I absolutely hate the naming (not to say
I love the code - just to say that I didn't even look at it, because I
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 06:32:07AM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
This is to show how we see C/R and to provoke discussion on number of
important issues (mounts, ...).
This is small part of long-awaited to be cleanuped code.
It's able to restore busyloop on i386 and x86_64 and restore i386
Hey Alexey,
I'm curious how you see these fitting in with the work that we've been
doing with Oren. Do you mean to just start a discussion or are you
really proposing these as an alternative to what Oren has been posting?
-- Dave
___
Containers
23 matches
Mail list logo
