David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've put these patches into the just-rebased net-2.6.24 tree.
I made a minor modification to the second patch, the
out_free_netdev: code in loopback_init() ended like this:
out_free_netdev:
free_netdev(dev);
goto out;
return err;
This would be a good opportunity to remove the single-allocated queue struct
in netdevice (at the bottom) that we had to put in to accomodate the static
loopback. Now we can set it back to a zero element list, and have
alloc_netdev_mq() just allocate the number of queues requested, not
num_queues
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:45:11 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Daniel Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing this makes loopback.c a better example of how to do a
simple network device, and it removes the special case
single static allocation of a struct net_device, hopefully
making
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:45:11 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Daniel Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing this makes loopback.c a better example of how to do a
simple network device, and it removes the special case
single static allocation of a struct net_device,
From: Peter Waskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:12:24 -0700
This would be a good opportunity to remove the single-allocated queue struct
in netdevice (at the bottom) that we had to put in to accomodate the static
loopback. Now we can set it back to a zero element list, and
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Peter Waskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:12:24 -0700
This would be a good opportunity to remove the single-allocated queue struct
in netdevice (at the bottom) that we had to put in to accomodate the static
loopback. Now we
