On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:34:35PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:24:37AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
If there really was a grouping that was always guaranteed to match the
way you wanted to group tasks for e.g. resource control, then yes, it
would be great to use
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:12:50PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
On 3/15/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:24:37AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
If there really was a grouping that was always guaranteed to match
the way you wanted to group tasks for e.g.
Herbert wrote:
looks good to me, except for the potential issue with
the double indirection introducing too much overhear
It's not the indirection count that I worry about.
It's the scalability of the locking. We must avoid as
much as possible adding any global locks on key code paths.
This
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:24:37AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
If there really was a grouping that was always guaranteed to match the
way you wanted to group tasks for e.g. resource control, then yes, it
would be great to use it. But I don't see an obvious candidate. The
pid namespace is not it,
On 3/15/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:24:37AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
If there really was a grouping that was always guaranteed to match the
way you wanted to group tasks for e.g. resource control, then yes, it
would be great to use it. But I
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:12:50PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
There are some things that benefit from having an abstract
container-like object available to store state, e.g. is this
container deleted?, should userspace get a callback when this
container is empty?.
IMO we can still get these
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:24:59PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
what about identifying different resource categories and
handling them according to the typical usage pattern?
like the following:
- cpu and scheduler related accounting/limits
- memory related accounting/limits
- network
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:28:20PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:24:59PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
what about identifying different resource categories and
handling them according to the typical usage pattern?
like the following:
- cpu and scheduler
