Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Benjamin Thery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My investigations on the increase of cpu load when running netperf inside a
container (ie. through etun2-etun1) is progressing slowly.
I'm not sure the cause is fragmentation as we supposed initially.
In fact, it seems related
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:29:05AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:25:42 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additions and removal from tty_drivers list were just done as well as
iterating on it for /proc/tty/drivers generation.
--- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, I think we have a difference of opinion. I think it's _all_ about
memory pressure, and you think it is _not_ about accounting for memory
pressure. :) Perhaps we mean different things,
Kirill Korotaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
we have the hack below in ip_forward() to avoid skb_cow(),
Banjamin, can you check whether it helps in your case please?
(NOTE: you will need to replace check for NETIF_F_VENET with something else
or introduce the same flag on etun device).
Ugh.
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would any of them work on a system on which every filesystem was on
ramfs, and there was no swap? If not then they are not memory attacks
but I/O attacks.
I completely concede that you can DOS the system with I/O if that is
not limited as well.
My
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 04:12 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Would any of them work on a system on which every filesystem was on
ramfs, and there was no swap? If not then they are not memory attacks
but I/O attacks.
I truly understand your point here. But, I don't think this thought
exercise
Hi Eric!
Hi Folks!
here is a real world example result from one of my tests
regarding the benefit of sharing over separate memory
the setup is quite simple, a typical machine used by
providers all over the world, a dual Pentium D 3.2GHz
with 4GB of memory and a single 160GB SATA disk running
a
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:30:00 +0100 Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Eric!
Hi Folks!
here is a real world example result from one of my tests
regarding the benefit of sharing over separate memory
the setup is quite simple, a typical machine used by
providers all over the
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:15:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/*
+ * Rules: you can only create a container if
+ * 1. you are capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)
+ * 2. the target container is a descendant of your own container
+ */
+static int ns_create(struct container_subsys *ss, struct
