On 6/22/07, Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with input in bytes is that the user will have to ensure
that the input is
a multiple of page size, which implies that she would need to use the
calculator every time.
Having input in bytes seems pretty natural to me. Why not
Paul Menage wrote:
On 6/22/07, Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with input in bytes is that the user will have to ensure
that the input is
a multiple of page size, which implies that she would need to use the
calculator every time.
Having input in bytes seems pretty
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 02:41:48PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
What's the purpose of the change?
Chopping small bits of utrace to mainline.
regset stuff looks reasonable and self-contained enough to start with.
However, regset part in utrace contain quite a few unused things, so
I'm leaving
Vasily Averin wrote:
+static int early_drop(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *orig)
+{
+ unsigned int i, hash, cnt;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ hash = hash_conntrack(orig);
+ cnt = NF_CT_PER_BUCKET;
+
+ for (i = 0;
+ !ret cnt i nf_conntrack_htable_size;
+
Quoting David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:19:34 -0600
Further and fundamentally all a global achieves is removing the need
for the noise patches where you pass the pointer into the various
functions. For long term
Quoting Jeff Garzik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Miller wrote:
I don't accept that we have to add another function argument
to a bunch of core routines just to support this crap,
especially since you give no way to turn it off
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:05 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
use cases for pagecache_limit alone without RSS_limit like the
Paul Menage wrote:
On 6/25/07, Paul Menage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/22/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
use cases for
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:33:42AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
While shadow directories appear to be a good idea, the current scheme
of controlling their creation and destruction outside of sysfs appears
to be a locking and maintenance nightmare in the face of sysfs
directories
Pavel Emelianov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Pavel Emelianov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | The most important one is moving exit_task_namespaces behind exit_notify
| | in do_exit() to make it possible to see the task's pid namespace to
| | properly notify the parent.
|
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ick, no, it isn't and doesn't apply at all :(
Groan. I wonder what changed this time...
Can you try the next -mm release?
Ok. As soon as I get back from OLS, I will rebase against
whatever is current.
Eric
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
