[Devel] [PATCH] x86_64: arch_pick_mmap_layout() fixlet

2007-06-28 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
sparse now warns about arch/x86_64/mm/mmap.c:15:3: warning: returning void-valued expression Generated code looks correct: there is jump to the end of arch_pick_mmap_layout() after ia32_pick_mmap_layout(), but this should be fixed regardless. Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [Devel] Re: [RFD] L2 Network namespace infrastructure

2007-06-28 Thread Kirill Korotaev
Ben Greear wrote: Kirill Korotaev wrote: Patrick McHardy wrote: I believe OpenVZ stores the current namespace somewhere global, which avoids passing the namespace around. Couldn't you do this as well? yes, we store a global namespace context on current (can be stored in per-cpu as

[Devel] Re: [RFD] L2 Network namespace infrastructure

2007-06-28 Thread Kirill Korotaev
Eric W. Biederman wrote: Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric W. Biederman wrote: -- The basic design There will be a network namespace structure that holds the global variables for a network namespace, making those global variables per network namespace. One of those per network

[Devel] Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers

2007-06-28 Thread Paul Menage
On 5/30/07, William Lee Irwin III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:14:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: So how do we do this? Is there any sneaky way in which we can modify the kernel so that this new code gets exercised more? Obviously, tossing init into some default

[Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers

2007-06-28 Thread Srivatsa Vaddagiri
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 05:27:25PM -0400, Paul Menage wrote: So maybe this would be better handled in userspace? Have a daemon listing on a process connector socket, and move processes between containers based on notifications from the connector and user-defined rules. We'd probably also