[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-04 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr wrote: Did you check the file /cgroup/name/tasks is empty ? it's probably a dumb question, but just in case :) Ok, since this is easy enough to reproduce, I got it into this state again. $ cat /cgroup/arch64-1/tasks $ it

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-04 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote: Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr wrote: Did you check the file /cgroup/name/tasks is empty ? it's probably a dumb question, but just

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-04 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote: tasks is empty, but there are subdirectories - 102, 26533, etc. This looks like the dirtywork of the ns cgroup.  If each of those subdirs is also empty then you can rmdir them, then rmdir /cgroup/arch64-1. Or, use a

[Devel] lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-03 Thread Dwight Schauer
process. I've tried destroying and recreating the container, un=mounting and remounting the given container, none work in that situation. Rebooting the root-node does correct the problem. If this is known to have been fixed in 0.6.4 then I'll upgrade to that. Dwight Schauer

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-03 Thread Dwight Schauer
127 7 1 devices 127 7 1 freezer 127 7 1 net_cls 127 7 1 That is all the information I have right now. Dwight Schauer ___ Containers mailing list contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-03 Thread Dwight Schauer
/rootfs/arch64-1/dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 Not sure if any of that is useful additional information. -- Dwight On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Dwight Schauer dscha...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Balbir Singh bsinghar...@gmail.com wrote: Can you please paste the output

[Devel] LXC PIDs, UIDs, and halt

2009-12-07 Thread Dwight Schauer
Hi all, I'm new to LXC but have been playing around with it some. I ran into a few issues: 1) PIDs for container processes show up on the controlling host (ps, top, etc). In OpenVZ there is a way to hide them. 2) All controlling host mounts show up in containers. 3) A kill -9 -1 run from a user

[Devel] Re: LXC PIDs, UIDs, and halt

2009-12-07 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote: Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): 4) In a opensuse container when I execute halt it is not just the container that halts, but the controlling host as well that shuts down. Make sure that the container

[Devel] New LXC HOW-TO

2009-12-07 Thread Dwight Schauer
I just made it and it is somewhat archlinux specific, but others might find it useful. http://lxc.teegra.net/ -- Dwight ___ Containers mailing list contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Devel] Re: New LXC HOW-TO

2009-12-07 Thread Dwight Schauer
negative impact (apart from size maybe) of having these features being enabled? Especially for those not using these features? On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Dwight Schauer dscha...@gmail.com wrote: I just made it and it is somewhat archlinux specific, but others might find it useful. http

[Devel] Re: LXC PIDs, UIDs, and halt

2009-12-07 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Dwight Schauer dscha...@gmail.com wrote: snip --- Ok, the issue is that what is stored in the file that keychain produces is based on PID When logging into a different PID namespace that file is considered stale, because there is not an agent at that pid

[Devel] Re: LXC PIDs, UIDs, and halt

2009-12-07 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote: Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote: Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Serge E

[Devel] Re: LXC PIDs, UIDs, and halt

2009-12-07 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote: Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote: Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): --- snip --- Is there anyway to readily know the id

[Devel] Re: LXC PIDs, UIDs, and halt

2009-12-07 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote: Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): Hi all, I'm new to LXC but have been playing around with it some. I ran into a few issues: 1) PIDs for container processes show up on the controlling host (ps, top, etc