On 24.01.2019 16:12, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
> Fuse file with FUSE_S_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY state should not allow to execute new
> requests. But in case of kio requests it doesn't work because the status check
> is located behind kio.op->req_send(). To fix this let's add the status check
> in
On 01.02.2019 18:13, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
>
>
> On 01.02.2019 17:24, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> On 24.01.2019 16:12, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
>>> Fuse file with FUSE_S_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY state should not allow to
>>> execute new
>>> requests. But in case of kio requests it doesn't work because the
On 01.02.2019 17:24, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 24.01.2019 16:12, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
>> Fuse file with FUSE_S_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY state should not allow to execute new
>> requests. But in case of kio requests it doesn't work because the status
>> check
>> is located behind kio.op->req_send(). To
On 24.01.2019 16:12, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
> Fuse file with FUSE_S_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY state should not allow to execute new
> requests. But in case of kio requests it doesn't work because the status check
> is located behind kio.op->req_send(). To fix this let's add the status check
> in
Fuse file with FUSE_S_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY state should not allow to execute new
requests. But in case of kio requests it doesn't work because the status check
is located behind kio.op->req_send(). To fix this let's add the status check
in pcs_fuse_submit().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Butsykin
---
Note:
