Hi Andrea and Vivek,
Ryo Tsuruta r...@valinux.co.jp wrote:
Hi Andrea and Vivek,
From: Andrea Righi righi.and...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io-controller: Add io group reference handling for
request
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:39:23 +0200
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:01:14AM -0400,
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 03:56:31PM +0900, Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
I think that only putting the hook in try_to_unmap() doesn't work
correctly, because IOs will be charged to reclaiming processes or
kswapd. These IOs should be charged to processes which cause memory
pressure.
Consider the
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 03:56:31PM +0900, Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
Hi Andrea and Vivek,
Ryo Tsuruta r...@valinux.co.jp wrote:
Hi Andrea and Vivek,
From: Andrea Righi righi.and...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io-controller: Add io group reference handling for
request
Date: Mon, 18 May
Hi Andrea and Vivek,
From: Andrea Righi righi.and...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io-controller: Add io group reference handling for request
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:39:23 +0200
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:01:14AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Andrea
From: Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io-controller: Add io group reference handling for request
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:01:14 -0400
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:06:43AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, May
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:06:43AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:15:24PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
}
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:01:14AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:06:43AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:15:24PM +0800,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:06:43AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:15:24PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
}
@@ -1462,20 +1462,27 @@ struct io_cgroup *get_iocg_from_bio(stru
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:15:24PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
}
@@ -1462,20 +1462,27 @@ struct io_cgroup *get_iocg_from_bio(stru
/*
* Find the io group bio belongs to.
* If create is set, io group is created if it is not already present.
+ * If curr is
Andrea Righi wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:15:24PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
}
@@ -1462,20 +1462,27 @@ struct io_cgroup *get_iocg_from_bio(stru
/*
* Find the io group bio belongs to.
* If create is set, io group is created if it is not already present.
+
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 03:40:05PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
Ok, here is the patch which gets rid of rq-iog and rq-rl fields. Good to
see some code and data structures trimming. It seems to be working fine for
me.
o Get rid of rq-iog field and rq-rl fields.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:15:24PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
}
@@ -1462,20 +1462,27 @@ struct io_cgroup *get_iocg_from_bio(stru
/*
* Find the io group bio belongs to.
* If create is set,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 04:16:38PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Andrea Righi wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:15:24PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
}
@@ -1462,20 +1462,27 @@ struct io_cgroup *get_iocg_from_bio(stru
/*
* Find the io group bio belongs to.
*
Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
}
@@ -1462,20 +1462,27 @@ struct io_cgroup *get_iocg_from_bio(stru
/*
* Find the io group bio belongs to.
* If create is set, io group is created if it is not already present.
+ * If curr is set, io group is information is searched for current
+ * task and not
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:33:05AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Nauman Rafique wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:45:32PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Hi Vivek,
This patch adds io group reference handling when allocating
Nauman Rafique wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:45:32PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Hi Vivek,
This patch adds io group reference handling when allocating
and removing a request.
Hi Gui,
Thanks for the patch. We were
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:45:32PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Hi Vivek,
This patch adds io group reference handling when allocating
and removing a request.
Hi Gui,
Thanks for the patch. We were thinking that requests can take a reference
on io queues and io queues can take a reference on
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:45:32PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Hi Vivek,
This patch adds io group reference handling when allocating
and removing a request.
Hi Gui,
Thanks for the patch. We were thinking that requests
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:41:01AM -0700, Nauman Rafique wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:45:32PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Hi Vivek,
This patch adds io group reference handling when allocating
and removing a
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:41:01AM -0700, Nauman Rafique wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:45:32PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
Hi Vivek,
This patch
20 matches
Mail list logo
