On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:13:56PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:45:11 -0700
Paul Menage men...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Li Zefanl...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
+ __ __ __ __ __ __ list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, tsk-thread_group,
thread_group)
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Andrew Mortona...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
s/tsk-sighand/p-sighand
Good catch, thanks. Fixed.
I see no fix anywhere so I did this:
I meant fixed in my tree to go out in the next set of patches.
---
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:45:11 -0700
Paul Menage men...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Li Zefanl...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
+ __ __ __ __ __ __ list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, tsk-thread_group,
thread_group) {
+ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ if (p-sighand) {
+ __ __ __ __
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:24:03 -0400 Ben Blum bb...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:13:56PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:45:11 -0700
Paul Menage men...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Li Zefanl...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
+
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Andrew Mortona...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
I was actually referring to the non-ascii crap in the email.
'twas Paul.
Hmm, so it was. It's sad how much gmail seems like like mangling ascii
patches ...
Paul
___
Paul Menage wrote:
From: Ben Blum bb...@google.com
Adds functionality to read/write lock CLONE_THREAD fork()ing per-threadgroup
This patch adds an rwsem that lives in a threadgroup's sighand_struct (next to
the sighand's atomic count, to piggyback on its cacheline), and two functions
in
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Li Zefanl...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, tsk-thread_group, thread_group) {
+ if (p-sighand) {
+ sighand = tsk-sighand;
s/tsk-sighand/p-sighand
Good catch, thanks. Fixed.
Paul
