On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:41:03PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:15:18PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| Greg Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 02:17 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
| | On Tue,
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:15:18PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| Greg Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 02:17 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
| | On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 07:45:28PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| |
Nadia Derbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 19:45 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| From 7f7caaa9d9014d7230dc0b1e0f75536f0b6ccdbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
| From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:12:02 -0800
| Subject: [PATCH 2/5] pid:
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 19:45 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
From 7f7caaa9d9014d7230dc0b1e0f75536f0b6ccdbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:12:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] pid: Generalize task_active_pid_ns
Currently
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 02:17 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 07:45:28PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
Currently task_active_pid_ns is not safe to call after a
task becomes a zombie and exit_task_namespaces is called,
as nsproxy becomes NULL.
Why do you need to be
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 07:45:28PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
Currently task_active_pid_ns is not safe to call after a
task becomes a zombie and exit_task_namespaces is called,
as nsproxy becomes NULL.
Why do you need to be able to get the pid namespace from zombie
processes? Also
