Nick Piggin wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 18 October 2007 16:24, Vasily Averin wrote:
Hi all,
could anybody explain how inactive may be much greater than cached?
stress test (http://weather.ou.edu/~apw/projects/stress/) that writes into
removed files in cycle puts the node to the following
On Thursday 18 October 2007 17:14, Vasily Averin wrote:
Nick Piggin wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 18 October 2007 16:24, Vasily Averin wrote:
Hi all,
could anybody explain how inactive may be much greater than cached?
stress test (http://weather.ou.edu/~apw/projects/stress/) that writes
Hi,
On Thursday 18 October 2007 16:24, Vasily Averin wrote:
Hi all,
could anybody explain how inactive may be much greater than cached?
stress test (http://weather.ou.edu/~apw/projects/stress/) that writes into
removed files in cycle puts the node to the following state:
MemTotal: 16401648
Nick Piggin wrote:
Some filesystems, including I believe, ext3 with data=ordered,
can leave orphaned pages around after they have been truncated
out of the pagecache. These pages get left on the LRU and vmscan
reclaims them pretty easily.
Try ext3 data=writeback, or even ext2.
thanks,
