On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Michal Skrivanek <
> michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18 Aug 2016, at 09:32, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Michal
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Michal Skrivanek <
michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 18 Aug 2016, at 09:32, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Michal Skrivanek <
> michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18 Aug 2016, at 09:09,
It will be very and and actually save the infra alot of coding and effort
to stop using this hook,
But I really think it will introduce another problem of bugs on POST.
If we can find a logic that will be the silver bullet for all the use cases
then lets do it, if not, we have to make sure ALL
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> It will be very and and actually save the infra alot of coding and effort
> to stop using this hook,
>
s very/very easy
> But I really think it will introduce another problem of bugs on POST.
>
> If we can find a logic
> On 18 Aug 2016, at 09:32, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Michal Skrivanek
> > wrote:
>
>> On 18 Aug 2016, at 09:09, Sandro Bonazzola >
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>> > I still thinks its a very valuable hook and we are aware of the fact it
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
> On 17/08/16 13:25, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > Only the owner of the bug knows if the all the required patches are
> merged
> > and backported to the correct repositories.
>
> Why not just set needinfo on bug assignee when all
On 17/08/16 13:25, Nir Soffer wrote:
> Only the owner of the bug knows if the all the required patches are merged
> and backported to the correct repositories.
Why not just set needinfo on bug assignee when all linked patches
are merged? this would ensure that missing patches get uploaded
asap
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> > I still thinks its a very valuable hook and we are aware of the fact it
> has
> > bugs, especially with patches on master branch and 4.0.
> >
> >
Hi All,
I'm currently working to solve this issue.
I will update you when done :)
Best Regards,
Shlomi Ben-David | Software Engineer | Red Hat ISRAEL
Red Hat Certified System Administrator | Red Hat Certified Engineer
IRC: shlomibendavid (on #rhev-integ, #rhev-dev, #rhev-ci)
OPEN SOURCE - 1 4
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> I still thinks its a very valuable hook and we are aware of the fact it has
> bugs, especially with patches on master branch and 4.0.
>
> Shlomi from the infra team is working on a solution for it as we speak and
> we hope to
I still thinks its a very valuable hook and we are aware of the fact it has
bugs, especially with patches on master branch and 4.0.
Shlomi from the infra team is working on a solution for it as we speak and
we hope to have a solution in the next few days, however it's not trival
to test and
בתאריך 17 באוג׳ 2016 12:06 אחה״צ, "Eli Mesika" כתב:
>
> I also got this, especially when bugs should be back-ported
> +1 for option #1
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Yedidyah Bar David
wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We currently have a bot that
I also got this, especially when bugs should be back-ported
+1 for option #1
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Yedidyah Bar David
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We currently have a bot that automatically moves bugs from POST to MODIFIED
> if all linked patches on gerrit are merged.
>
>
Hi all,
We currently have a bot that automatically moves bugs from POST to MODIFIED
if all linked patches on gerrit are merged.
It happened to me personally several times that this was a wrong thing to do,
either because a new patch was still needed but not pushed yet, or because
an existing
15 matches
Mail list logo