Re: [ovirt-devel] Post: External DSL for API Specification in oVirt

2016-10-25 Thread Arik Hadas
- Original Message - > Hi Arik, > > nice article. I do agree that external DSLs are useful, but I have Thanks! > (long-standing) objection to inventing new ones, especially in an area > of SDKs. I still feel we should have adopted something that is (at > least close to) industry

Re: [ovirt-devel] Post: External DSL for API Specification in oVirt

2016-10-25 Thread Martin Sivak
Hi Arik, nice article. I do agree that external DSLs are useful, but I have (long-standing) objection to inventing new ones, especially in an area of SDKs. I still feel we should have adopted something that is (at least close to) industry standard - Swagger [1] or maybe Blueprint [2]. We would

[ovirt-devel] Post: External DSL for API Specification in oVirt

2016-10-25 Thread Arik Hadas
Hi All, Last month I attended Juan's session on the recent changes in RHV API. I wrote a post on how I believe it can be enhanced by using an external domain-specific language rather than the internal domain-specific language that is used today: