> In that case , if we will not use SP , we still will have to secure the data
> (for example , hidden columns for some users like in the VDS view)
But isn't this the current problem?
- The whole permission model is so complicated that nobody wants to
write new queries with it. (custom solution)
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Eli Mesika wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Martin Mucha wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I didn't want to step into this, but I was asked by dan to express my
>> opinion about this. I'm not pushing for change (since I
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Martin Mucha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I didn't want to step into this, but I was asked by dan to express my
> opinion about this. I'm not pushing for change (since I believe it will be
> blocked), I'm just trying to help us focus. We should have some
Hi,
I didn't want to step into this, but I was asked by dan to express my
opinion about this. I'm not pushing for change (since I believe it will be
blocked), I'm just trying to help us focus. We should have some questions
answered prior to saying what we want to do...
Current state of accessing
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Eli Mesika wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > I don't think that looking in SQL
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Eli Mesika wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky
> wrote:
>
>> > I don't think that looking in SQL in Java code is clear than looking
>> in a SP code
>>
>> Looking in SQL isn't the problem I'm
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky
wrote:
> > I don't think that looking in SQL in Java code is clear than looking in
> a SP code
>
> Looking in SQL isn't the problem I'm trying to solve, but finding that.
>
> > 1) You will pass more data on the wire
> I don't think that looking in SQL in Java code is clear than looking in
a SP code
Looking in SQL isn't the problem I'm trying to solve, but finding that.
> 1) You will pass more data on the wire instead of calling a SP with
parameters
Passing the SQL string shouldn't be a problem unless that
> 1. DAO files might become very long.
They would not be much longer than the current alternative, the .sql files.
> 2. An inflation of business entities to represent partial populated
business entity or inflation of mappers inflation (this will be required
for SP as well).
This isn't a problem
I agree with Moti, but I think we might have an alternative.
Does our DAO layer support named queries (aka PreparedStatements
loaded from a properties file)? Those are generally plain SQL queries
with arguments that are compiled in advance and still allow direct
access to the JDBC internals
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Moti Asayag wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Recently I had a task of performance improvement in one of our network
>> related flows and had some hard time
Hi All,
Recently I had a task of performance improvement in one of our network
related flows and had some hard time following our DAL code and one of the
outcomes of the task was defining a couple of new quite simple, but neat
queries.
When I came to coding those new queries I remembered how hard
12 matches
Mail list logo