Re: [ovirt-devel] ovirt-appliance (today) is 1.5G...

Thanks Yaniv. Sandro, where should the fix be. In Engine or on the Node level? To me it sounds like this should be fixed in Engine. - fabian On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Sandro Bonazzola >

Re: [ovirt-devel] ovirt-appliance (today) is 1.5G...

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Fabian Deutsch > wrote: > >> Heya, >> >> the size went down to ~800MB again in master. >> >> The best opportunity to reduce the size is to trim the

Re: [ovirt-devel] ovirt-appliance (today) is 1.5G...

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote: > Heya, > > the size went down to ~800MB again in master. > > The best opportunity to reduce the size is to trim the dependency tree. > The lowest hanging fruit is to get rid of the (partial) X11 stack > which we are

Re: [ovirt-devel] ovirt-appliance (today) is 1.5G...

Heya, the size went down to ~800MB again in master. The best opportunity to reduce the size is to trim the dependency tree. The lowest hanging fruit is to get rid of the (partial) X11 stack which we are pulling in. - fabian On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:

Re: [ovirt-devel] ovirt-appliance (today) is 1.5G...

ningful with something which is already a sparsified image wrapped in an >> RPM, but I'll test... >> >> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Doron Fediuck <dfedi...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> FYI >>> >>> ------ Forwarded message --

Re: [ovirt-devel] ovirt-appliance (today) is 1.5G...

6:35 AM, Doron Fediuck <dfedi...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> FYI >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> >> Date: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:13 AM >> Subject: [ovirt-devel] ovirt-appliance (today) is 1.5G... >

Re: [ovirt-devel] ovirt-appliance (today) is 1.5G...

a sparsified image wrapped in an RPM, but I'll test... On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Doron Fediuck <dfedi...@redhat.com> wrote: > FYI > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> > Date: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:13 AM > Subject: [ovirt

[ovirt-devel] ovirt-appliance (today) is 1.5G...

I'm sure it was less just days ago, but now[1] it is again quite big. 4.0's is 'only' 1G in size[2]. Which anyway raises the question - should we provide delta RPMs for it? Thanks, Y. [1]