On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Martin Perina wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Ravi
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Piotr Kliczewski wrote:
>
>
> śr., 25 kwi 2018, 19:07 użytkownik Martin Perina
> napisał:
>>
>> Ravi/Piotr, so what's the connection between non-blocking threads,
>> jsonrpc-java connection closing and failing this network
śr., 25 kwi 2018, 19:07 użytkownik Martin Perina
napisał:
> Ravi/Piotr, so what's the connection between non-blocking threads,
> jsonrpc-java connection closing and failing this network test? Does it mean
> that non-blocking threads change just revealed the jsonrpc-java issue
Ravi/Piotr, so what's the connection between non-blocking threads,
jsonrpc-java connection closing and failing this network test? Does it mean
that non-blocking threads change just revealed the jsonrpc-java issue which
we haven't noticed before?
And did the test really works with code prior to
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Martin Perina wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Dan
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Martin Perina wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Dan
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:27 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Ravi Shankar Nori
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Dan Kenigsberg
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:09 PM,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Ravi Shankar Nori
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Dan Kenigsberg
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:47 AM,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dan Kenigsberg
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Ravi
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Martin
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Martin Perina
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 3:17 PM,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Martin Perina wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:00 AM,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Martin Perina wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Dan Kenigsberg
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ravi's patch is in, but a similar problem
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>
>> Ravi's patch is in, but a similar problem remains, and the test cannot
>> be put back into its place.
>>
>> It seems that while Vdsm
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>
>> Ravi's patch is in, but a similar problem remains, and the test cannot
>> be put back into its place.
>>
>> It seems that while Vdsm
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> Ravi's patch is in, but a similar problem remains, and the test cannot
> be put back into its place.
>
> It seems that while Vdsm was taken down, a couple of getCapsAsync
> requests queued up. At one point, the host
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>
>> Ravi's patch is in, but a similar problem remains, and the test cannot
>> be put back into its place.
>>
>> It seems that while Vdsm was
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> Ravi's patch is in, but a similar problem remains, and the test cannot
> be put back into its place.
>
> It seems that while Vdsm was taken down, a couple of getCapsAsync
>
- Why is VDSM down?
Y.
> requests queued up.
Ravi's patch is in, but a similar problem remains, and the test cannot
be put back into its place.
It seems that while Vdsm was taken down, a couple of getCapsAsync
requests queued up. At one point, the host resumed its connection,
before the requests have been cleared of the queue. After the
> On 12 Apr 2018, at 17:15, Dafna Ron wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> we are failing randomly on test 006_migrations.migrate_vm with what seems to
> be the same issue.
>
> the vm seems to be migrated successfully but engine thinks that it failed and
> re-calls migration getting a
hi,
we are failing randomly on test 006_migrations.migrate_vm with what seems
to be the same issue.
the vm seems to be migrated successfully but engine thinks that it failed
and re-calls migration getting a response of vm already exists.
I don't think this is an issue with the test but rather a
Arik Hadas writes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Alona Kaplan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Gal Ben Haim wrote:
>>
>>> I'm seeing the same error in [1], during 006_migrations.migrate_vm.
>>>
>>> [1]
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Alona Kaplan wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Gal Ben Haim wrote:
>
>> I'm seeing the same error in [1], during 006_migrations.migrate_vm.
>>
>> [1]
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Gal Ben Haim wrote:
> I'm seeing the same error in [1], during 006_migrations.migrate_vm.
>
> [1] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-4.2_change-queue-tester/1650/
>
Seems like another bug. The migration failed since for some reason the vm
is
Hi Ravi,
Added comments to the patch.
Regarding the lock - the lock shouldn't be released until the command and
its callbacks were finished. The treatment of a delayed failure should be
under lock since it doesn't make sense to take care of the failure while
other monitoring process is possibly
This [1] should fix the multiple release lock issue
[1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/90077/
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Ravi Shankar Nori wrote:
> Working on a patch will post a fix
>
> Thanks
>
> Ravi
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Alona Kaplan
Working on a patch will post a fix
Thanks
Ravi
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Alona Kaplan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looking at the log it seems that the new GetCapabilitiesAsync is
> responsible for the mess.
>
> -
> * 08:29:47 - engine loses connectivity to host
I'm seeing the same error in [1], during 006_migrations.migrate_vm.
[1] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-4.2_change-queue-tester/1650/
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Alona Kaplan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looking at the log it seems that the new GetCapabilitiesAsync is
>
Hi all,
Looking at the log it seems that the new GetCapabilitiesAsync is
responsible for the mess.
-
* 08:29:47 - engine loses connectivity to host 'lago-basic-suite-4-2-host-0'.*
*- Every 3 seconds a getCapabalititiesAsync request is sent to the
host (unsuccessfully).*
* before each
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Edward Haas wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>
>> Was already done by Yaniv - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/89851.
>> Is it still failing?
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Barak Korren
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> Was already done by Yaniv - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/89851.
> Is it still failing?
>
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
>
>> On 7 April 2018 at 00:30, Dan Kenigsberg
Was already done by Yaniv - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/89851.
Is it still failing?
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> On 7 April 2018 at 00:30, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > No, I am afraid that we have not managed to understand why
On 7 April 2018 at 00:30, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> No, I am afraid that we have not managed to understand why setting and
> ipv6 address too the host off the grid. We shall continue researching
> this next week.
>
> Edy, https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/88637/ is already 4 weeks
No, I am afraid that we have not managed to understand why setting and
ipv6 address too the host off the grid. We shall continue researching
this next week.
Edy, https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/88637/ is already 4 weeks old, but
could it possibly be related (I really doubt that)?
On Fri, Apr 6,
Dan, was there a fix for the issues?
can I have a link to the fix if there was?
Thanks,
Dafna
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Gal Ben Haim wrote:
> From lago's log, I see that lago collected the logs from the VMs using ssh
> (after the test failed), which means
> that the
>From lago's log, I see that lago collected the logs from the VMs using ssh
(after the test failed), which means
that the VM didn't crash.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Barak Korren wrote:
> > Test
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Barak Korren wrote:
> Test failed: [ 006_migrations.prepare_migration_attachments_ipv6 ]
>
> Link to suspected patches:
> (Probably unrelated)
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/89812/1 (ovirt-engine-sdk) - examples:
> export template to an export
37 matches
Mail list logo