On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 07:57:32PM +0200, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
>
> Due to some confusion around how alternatives worked, I screwed up the
> list of packages here. I've updated it below. I'll give it a few
> more days before filing the actual bugs.
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Andrew
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Andrew Lutomirski"
Date: Apr 30, 2014 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: Mass bug: packages should not auto-enable systemd units
To:
Cc:
Due to some confusion around how alternatives worked, I screwed up the
list of packages here. I've updated it below. I'll gi
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:27:47PM -0400, Nir Soffer wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Dan Kenigsberg"
> > To: "Saggi Mizrahi" , nsof...@redhat.com
> > Cc: devel@ovirt.org, "David Teigland"
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 10:33:39 AM
> > Subject: Re: Sanlock fencing reservation
On 04/30/2014 07:04 PM, Vered Volansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install vdsm on a fedora20 machine with the following error.
> I've been following
> http://www.ovirt.org/Download#Fedora_Installation_Instructions .
> I've also tried "yum clean all" - to no avail.
>
> Any idea anybody?
>
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Kenigsberg"
> To: "Saggi Mizrahi" , nsof...@redhat.com
> Cc: devel@ovirt.org, "David Teigland"
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 10:33:39 AM
> Subject: Re: Sanlock fencing reservations
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:14:33AM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
>
On 30/04/14 14:22 +0100, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:54:29PM +0300, ybronhei wrote:
hey,
somehow we missed the summary of this call, and few "big" issues
were raised there. so i would like to share it with all and hear
more comments
- task id in http header - allows engine
Hi,
I'm trying to install vdsm on a fedora20 machine with the following error.
I've been following
http://www.ovirt.org/Download#Fedora_Installation_Instructions .
I've also tried "yum clean all" - to no avail.
Any idea anybody?
Thanks,
Vered
==
- Original Message -
> From: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> To: "arch"
> Cc: "Nir Soffer" , "David Teigland"
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 6:14:33 PM
> Subject: Sanlock fencing reservations
>
> I've recently been introduced to the this feature and I was wondering is this
> really
> the correc
All:
It has been requested that we add date/timestamps to the Features pages in
order to highlight the age of each page and assist users in determining how
fresh information is. After investigating various options to do this within the
database or using automated code, it seems that the old-fas
Hi,
today I've seen that ovirt-hosted-engine-ha was missing proper tagging of
version released.
I've not checked all projects so this is just a reminder.
Maintainers, please ensure that all previous releases are properly tagged (at
least GA ones, but RC and beta are recommended too) and please re
Hi Lior, please find my comments inline.
- Original Message -
> From: "Yair Zaslavsky"
> To: "Lior Vernia"
> Cc: devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 3:28:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Custom Properties code duplication
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:37:22PM +0300, ybronhei wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 04:22 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:54:29PM +0300, ybronhei wrote:
> >>hey,
> >>
> >>somehow we missed the summary of this call, and few "big" issues
> >>were raised there. so i would like to share i
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:41:40AM -0400, Piotr Kliczewski wrote:
> Adding to the discussion.
Your CC line was too huge. devel@ovirt.org should be used to such
discussions.
>
> Currently vdsm-xmlrpc rpm is required by vdsm and vdsm-cli rpms. Initially I
> suggested to have vdsm-jsonrpc required
On 04/30/2014 04:22 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:54:29PM +0300, ybronhei wrote:
hey,
somehow we missed the summary of this call, and few "big" issues
were raised there. so i would like to share it with all and hear
more comments
- task id in http header - allows engine
- Original Message -
> From: "Lior Vernia"
> To: devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 3:52:16 PM
> Subject: [ovirt-devel] Custom Properties code duplication
>
> Hello,
>
> While adding network custom properties towards oVirt 3.5, I got to take
> a good look at the custom p
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:54:29PM +0300, ybronhei wrote:
> hey,
>
> somehow we missed the summary of this call, and few "big" issues
> were raised there. so i would like to share it with all and hear
> more comments
>
> - task id in http header - allows engine to initiate calls with id
> instead
Hello,
I'm just curious as to the restriction mentioned at the bottom of the
feature page; it basically means that users who use customized VLAN
device name can't perform networking operations from the engine
involving those VLAN tags.
Can't VDSM locate the proper device according to the VLAN tag
Very nice feature page.
I think in UX you can add the VLAN tag in the VLAN column in the Network
Interfaces sub tab under Host.
Also from REST perspective you should allow to send the base interface for
Setup Networks action, to explicitly specify which interface you're adding the
network on,
Hello,
While adding network custom properties towards oVirt 3.5, I got to take
a good look at the custom properties code in the backend and frontend.
It seems to me like there's a lot of code duplication, and I would like
to suggest the following refactoring:
1. Remove dependencies on Pattern/Mat
On 04/30/2014 02:10 PM, Liao, Chuan (Jason Liao, HPservers-Core-OE-PSC)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When we finish all the restful API code for NUMA feature and test it.
>
> We met one problem which is hard to debug, as attachment.
>
> Could you help us to review our code or give us some suggestion to debu
Hi,
When we finish all the restful API code for NUMA feature and test it.
We met one problem which is hard to debug, as attachment.
Could you help us to review our code or give us some suggestion to debug this
problem ?
The patch set link:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/26943
Thank you very much.
Be
Thanks for the clarification!
Am 30.04.2014 12:05, schrieb Juan Hernandez:
> Actually Vojtech is correct, as this is a problem only for UI plugins,
> because they share the session created by webadmin. Webadmin creates the
> session using /ovirt-engine/api, so it won't work if UI plugins try to
>
On 04/30/2014 11:17 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.04.2014 17:05, schrieb Vojtech Szocs:
>> just a quick note on UI plugin vs. REST API integration,
>> there are currently two ways to work with REST API:
>>
>> * (standard) /ovirt-engine/api
>> * (legacy) /api
>>
>> Please don't use the lega
On 04/30/2014 10:35 AM, Vikas Kokare wrote:
> Juan,
> Is there a workaround this issue? For eg, the absolute value of
> the statistic is correct, and hence the negative sign can be ignored. I
> am asking this, because the upgrade to higher versions of RHEVM (server
> and API) looks unlikely
Am 30.04.2014 09:54, schrieb Alona Kaplan:
> Hi all,
>
> This refactoring is targeted to 3.5.
>
> Please review the feature page and share your thoughts:
>
> http://www.ovirt.org/Feature/ArbitraryVlanDeviceName
Does this have any drawbacks when you use REST
to work with vlans ? I guess not?
Am 29.04.2014 17:05, schrieb Vojtech Szocs:
> just a quick note on UI plugin vs. REST API integration,
> there are currently two ways to work with REST API:
>
> * (standard) /ovirt-engine/api
> * (legacy) /api
>
> Please don't use the legacy URL, since "sessionId" that
> is acquired via RestA
Juan,
Is there a workaround this issue? For eg, the absolute value of the
statistic is correct, and hence the negative sign can be ignored. I am
asking this, because the upgrade to higher versions of RHEVM (server and
API) looks unlikely for us.
-Vikas
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Ju
Il 29/04/2014 08:56, Sandro Bonazzola ha scritto:
> Hi,
> we're going to create ovirt-engine-3.4.1 branch tomorrow morning 08:00 UTC in
> order to allow 3.4.2 development starting on 3.4 branch while we prepare
> for 3.4.1 GA release.
> So starting tomorrow morning, if you have patches targeted to
On 04/30/2014 05:28 AM, Vikas Kokare wrote:
> The "memory.used" statistic on a virtual machine is returning a negative
> value , ie.
>
> href="/api/vms/260f8508-2bea-4202-9b93-f8f0dcddc334/statistics/b7499508-c1c3-32f0-8174-c1783e57bb08"
> id="b7499508-c1c3-32f0-8174-c1783e57bb08">memory.usedMemo
Hi all,
This refactoring is targeted to 3.5.
Please review the feature page and share your thoughts:
http://www.ovirt.org/Feature/ArbitraryVlanDeviceName
Thanks,
Alona
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On 04/29/2014 07:59 PM, Keith Robertson wrote:
>
>
> On 4/29/14, 1:26 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
>> On 04/29/2014 07:17 PM, Keith Robertson wrote:
>>> Are the REST libraries[1,2] being updated to point to the new URL by
>>> default?
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Python-sdk
>>> [2] http://www.ov
31 matches
Mail list logo
