Re: [ovirt-devel] execCmd() and storing stdout and stderr in log file

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Yaniv Bronheim wrote: > Hi > I do work to remove the cpopen usages from execCmd. Using std popen over > py3 and subprocess32 over py2 which both implements the same api. The only > gap is the output object for async calls that we need to

[ovirt-devel] update - no infra support for the next 2 days

FYI, Due to various holidays, PTOs and an on going 3.6.8 build there is not infra support for the next two days. If there are urgent issues, please open a ticket to infra-supp...@ovirt.org and we'll do our best to handle it if possible. -- Eyal Edri Associate Manager RHEV DevOps EMEA ENG

Re: [ovirt-devel] execCmd() and storing stdout and stderr in log file

Hi I do work to remove the cpopen usages from execCmd. Using std popen over py3 and subprocess32 over py2 which both implements the same api. The only gap is the output object for async calls that we need to align with the standard implementation and modify our current usages. I don't think that

[ovirt-devel] SPM or SDM for a new verb?

Hi! I'm writing code for a new verb (sparsifyInplace) in VDSM and got two different opinions about whether to use SPM or SDM for it: 1) SDM is the new correct approach, need to use it. 2) SDM is on early stage and may be changed significantly, so it is better to use SPM as mature and reliable

Re: [ovirt-devel] SPM or SDM for a new verb?

On 05/07/16 12:07 +0300, Shmuel Melamud wrote: Hi! I'm writing code for a new verb (sparsifyInplace) in VDSM and got two different opinions about whether to use SPM or SDM for it: 1) SDM is the new correct approach, need to use it. 2) SDM is on early stage and may be changed significantly, so

[ovirt-devel] oVirt Community Newsletter: June 2016

Not only was June the occasion of the Red Hat Summit event in San Francisco, where oVirt was well-represented in the event and within Community Central, but it was also the month where the year's biggest release, oVirt 4.0! The latest release of oVirt features: * A New Administration Portal *

Re: [ovirt-devel] Ovirt Node Next 4.0.0 host networking setup attempts to bridge an Infiniband interface

Hi Giorgio - Unfortunately, I don't actually have any infiniband hardware to test with in my lab. I'm not even sure anybody on the Node team knew there were IPoIB use environments. That's great news (for 3.6)! oVirt Node Next is much closer to "plain" RHEL. This sounds like it may be a bug in