Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] [JSONRPC] early, coarse grained benchmarks

2014-11-17 Thread Francesco Romani
- Original Message - From: Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com To: Francesco Romani from...@redhat.com Cc: engine-de...@ovirt.org devel@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:35:30 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] [JSONRPC] early, coarse grained benchmarks [...] I'm profiling

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] [JSONRPC] early, coarse grained benchmarks

2014-11-17 Thread Nir Soffer
- Original Message - From: Francesco Romani from...@redhat.com To: engine-de...@ovirt.org devel@ovirt.org Cc: Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:47:40 AM Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] [JSONRPC] early, coarse grained benchmarks - Original

[ovirt-devel] [db] add config key with same value to multiple versions

2014-11-17 Thread Eli Mesika
Hi Please note that I have added a common function to ease handling of configuration settings: signature : fn_db_add_config_value_for_versions_up_to(v_option_name, v_val , v_version ) so, for example, if you want to add a new feature F1 flag, which is true only for 3.6, to _config.sql

Re: [ovirt-devel] [db] add config key with same value to multiple versions

2014-11-17 Thread Eli Mesika
- Original Message - From: Eli Mesika emes...@redhat.com To: engine-de...@ovirt.org devel@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 12:42:29 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [db] add config key with same value to multiple versions - Original Message - From: Eli

Re: [ovirt-devel] [db] add config key with same value to multiple versions

2014-11-17 Thread Eli Mesika
- Original Message - From: Eli Mesika emes...@redhat.com To: engine-de...@ovirt.org devel@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 12:40:53 PM Subject: [ovirt-devel] [db] add config key with same value to multiple versions Hi Please note that I have added a common

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] Ubuntu/Debian support?

2014-11-17 Thread Sven Kieske
On 17/11/14 08:41, Itamar Heim wrote: 1) Is this still an issue? Yes of course, or is it implemented yet? 2) Can we afford to dilute the focus we have as it is hard enough to stabilize the currently supported distro's? is it worth the potential impact? In general: Software which

[ovirt-devel] ATTN frontend maintainers

2014-11-17 Thread Alexander Wels
Hi, I just merged [1], which causes *ListModels to be managed by GIN. What does this mean for you? Well if you are creating a new ListModel you should also have them managed by GIN as the CommonModel no longer manages them. If you have any problems with this let me know I will walk you through

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] Ubuntu/Debian support?

2014-11-17 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Il 17/11/2014 14:22, Sven Kieske ha scritto: On 17/11/14 08:41, Itamar Heim wrote: 1) Is this still an issue? Yes of course, or is it implemented yet? 2) Can we afford to dilute the focus we have as it is hard enough to stabilize the currently supported distro's? is it worth the

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] vdsm_master_install-rpm-sanity-el6_created bugged and vdsm spec file broken

2014-11-17 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 08:24:40AM -0500, Ondřej Svoboda wrote: Hi, I am in favor of tagging e.g. the commit introducing the hook in question [1] with v4.16.99. (Similarly, in the message to ovirt-users [2] I suggested that anyone interested in the hook tag their master branch with