- Original Message -
From: "Shubhendu Tripathi"
To: "Einav Cohen" , "Alok Srivastava"
Cc: de...@linode01.ovirt.org, "rhsc-dev"
Sent: Thursday, January 1, 2015 11:30:41 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Gluster Volume Snapshots - Feature review
On 01/01/2015 10:36 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
>>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:59:50PM +0200, Lior Vernia wrote:
>
>
> On 12/01/15 14:44, Oved Ourfali wrote:
> > Hi Sahina,
> >
> > Some comments:
> >
> > 1. As far as I understand, you might not have an IP available immediately
> > after setupNetworks runs (getCapabilities should run, but it isn
> 2. "Storage Network": if you intend to keep this role in the feature (I
> don't think it adds a lot of functionality, see article 1b), it might be
> better to call it "Gluster Network" - otherwise people using virt mode
> might think this network is gonna be used to communicate with other
> types
On 12/01/15 14:44, Oved Ourfali wrote:
> Hi Sahina,
>
> Some comments:
>
> 1. As far as I understand, you might not have an IP available immediately
> after setupNetworks runs (getCapabilities should run, but it isn't run
> automatically, afair).
> 2. Perhaps you should pass not the IP but th
Hi Sahina! :)
Cool feature, and I think long-awaited by many users. I have a few comments:
1. In the "Add Bricks" dialog, it seems like the "IP Address" field is a
list box - I presume the items contained there are all IP addresses
configured on the host's interfaces.
1. a. May I suggest that th
Hi Sahina,
Some comments:
1. As far as I understand, you might not have an IP available immediately after
setupNetworks runs (getCapabilities should run, but it isn't run automatically,
afair).
2. Perhaps you should pass not the IP but the name of the network? IPs might
change.
3. Adding to "2
Hi all,
Please review the feature page for this proposed solution and provide
your inputs - http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Select_Network_For_Gluster
thanks
sahina
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/12, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il 09/01/2015 23:48, David Caro Estevez ha scritto:
> > I really discourage having separated repos for specs, scripts or any 'code'
> > used for building any official packages.
> >
> > That complicates (to the point of making it not feasible) a continuous
> >