Re: [ovirt-devel] Packaging: Rationale for some split packages

2016-01-22 Thread Nir Soffer
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote: > Yaniv Bronheim writes: > >> If in debian we will have different set of rpms for vdsm, can you >> please also add section about how to build and install vdsm over >> debian in

Re: [ovirt-devel] vdsm_master_storage-tests_wip_testing disabled since May 2015

2016-01-22 Thread Nir Soffer
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Hi: > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/user/sbonazzo/my-views/view/Disabled/job/vdsm_master_storage-tests_wip_testing/ > is disabled since may 2015 and marked as wip. > Looks like it's not really a WIP... Can we delete it? >

Re: [ovirt-devel] Packaging: Rationale for some split packages

2016-01-22 Thread Nir Soffer
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Piotr Kliczewski wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> I work on inclusion of Vdsm into Debian. I don't know what are the >> reasons for having separate `infra', `xmlrpc', `yajsonrpc',

Re: [ovirt-devel] Packaging: Rationale for some split packages

2016-01-22 Thread Piotr Kliczewski
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote: > I work on inclusion of Vdsm into Debian. I don't know what are the > reasons for having separate `infra', `xmlrpc', `yajsonrpc', and > `jsonrpc' packages. > - infra package contains infra related modules like

Re: [ovirt-devel] [RFC] Proposal for dropping FC22 jenkins tests on master branch

2016-01-22 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Sandro Bonazzola > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 01:11:25PM

[ovirt-devel] [UI plugins] replacing RestApiSessionAcquired event

2016-01-22 Thread Vojtech Szocs
Hi, in oVirt 4.0 the RestApiSessionAcquired event will be replaced with API to create authenticated requests for Engine services. Using REST API persistent session mechanism where UI acquires a single session to be shared by all UI plugins led us to many problems in the past, typically observed

Re: [ovirt-devel] Packaging: Rationale for some split packages

2016-01-22 Thread Milan Zamazal
Yaniv Bronheim writes: > If in debian we will have different set of rpms for vdsm, can you > please also add section about how to build and install vdsm over > debian in https://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers ? Sure, I'm going to update Debian information on Wiki (as well as

Re: [ovirt-devel] Packaging: Rationale for some split packages

2016-01-22 Thread Yaniv Bronheim
If in debian we will have different set of rpms for vdsm, can you please also add section about how to build and install vdsm over debian in https://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers ? On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote: > Thank you for clarification. So as

[ovirt-devel] Vdsm leak in multiprocessing / supervdsm interaction

2016-01-22 Thread Milan Zamazal
FYI, when I performed my simple Vdsm leak test some time ago, I've found a leak in Python multiprocessing module, where multiprocessing.util._afterfork_registry dictionary grows on each supervdsm call. It's not much dramatic from the point of memory usage but maybe the possibly large dictionary

[ovirt-devel] vdsm_master_storage-tests_wip_testing disabled since May 2015

2016-01-22 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Hi: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/user/sbonazzo/my-views/view/Disabled/job/vdsm_master_storage-tests_wip_testing/ is disabled since may 2015 and marked as wip. Looks like it's not really a WIP... Can we delete it? If noone take ownership, we'll delete it on February 1st. -- Sandro Bonazzola Better