Re: [ovirt-devel] Heads-up: moving Libvirt xml creation to the engine

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Arik Hadas wrote: > Hi All, > > We are working on something that is expected to have a big impact, hence > this heads-up. > First, we want you to be aware of this change and provide your feedback to > make it as good as possible. > Second,

[ovirt-devel] Red Hat Summit: oVirt Talk(s) Submission

One of the big events for the year is the Red Hat Summit, which has a dedicated open source community track for upstream projects. At the very least this is an opportunity to give a "state of the union" talk for the various communities, including oVirt. There are a significant number of

Re: [ovirt-devel] Heads-up: moving Libvirt xml creation to the engine

On 11/23/2016 07:59 AM, Arik Hadas wrote: Hi All, We are working on something that is expected to have a big impact, hence this heads-up. First, we want you to be aware of this change and provide your feedback to make it as good as possible. Second, until the proposed mechanism is fully

Re: [ovirt-devel] ovirt-appliance (today) is 1.5G...

Thanks Yaniv. Sandro, where should the fix be. In Engine or on the Node level? To me it sounds like this should be fixed in Engine. - fabian On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Sandro Bonazzola >

[ovirt-devel] set_modified_hook (update)

Hi All, This email is an update for the set_modified hook hook: set_modified hook goal: when patch merged, changes the bug status from POST to MODIFIED. - The current version of the hook doesn't checks that all previous patches (on the external tracker) were closed before setting the bug

Re: [ovirt-devel] New test failure on travis

All travis builds fail since https://github.com/oVirt/vdsm/commit/c859258bd83212c8ed3bff8436e5158da81bbba0 See https://travis-ci.org/oVirt/vdsm/builds Edward, please mark this test as broken on travis, or functional, until we have running network manager in the test environment. Thanks, Nir

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] [Feture discussion] Full vacuum tool

On 8 December 2016 at 12:16, Roy Golan wrote: > > > On 8 December 2016 at 10:06, Yedidyah Bar David wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Eldad Marciano >> wrote: >> > just forgot to mention that no customization required just

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] [Feture discussion] Full vacuum tool

On 8 December 2016 at 10:06, Yedidyah Bar David wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Eldad Marciano > wrote: > > just forgot to mention that no customization required just plug & play he > > will collect a large set of informative data by deafult > > >

Re: [ovirt-devel] New test failure on travis

On 08/12/16 11:26 +0200, Edward Haas wrote: On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Martin Polednik wrote: On 08/12/16 09:28 +0200, Edward Haas wrote: On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: broken_on_ci is uses default name="OVIRT_CI", to

Re: [ovirt-devel] New test failure on travis

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Martin Polednik wrote: > On 08/12/16 09:28 +0200, Edward Haas wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: >> >> broken_on_ci is uses default name="OVIRT_CI", to mark it also for >>> travis, we need

Re: [ovirt-devel] New test failure on travis

On 08/12/16 09:28 +0200, Edward Haas wrote: On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: broken_on_ci is uses default name="OVIRT_CI", to mark it also for travis, we need another broken_on_ci with name="TRAVIS_CI". Maybe this test should run only if nm is active on

Re: [ovirt-devel] The engine build job you probably didn't know exists

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Eyal Edri wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Yedidyah Bar David wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Eyal Edri wrote: >> > FYI, >> > >> > After hearing that this might be useful to many

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] [Feture discussion] Full vacuum tool

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Eldad Marciano wrote: > just forgot to mention that no customization required just plug & play he > will collect a large set of informative data by deafult > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Eldad Marciano wrote: >> >>