Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] Lowering the bar for wiki contribution?

2017-06-15 Thread Edward Haas 
Hi all,

Came back to this thread due to a need to post some design documentation.
After fetching the ovirt-site and looking up where to start the document, I
remembered why I stopped using it.

After exploring several options, including the GitHub wiki, I think that
for the development documentation we can just go with the minimum:
Use a repo to just post markdown and image files, letting GitHub
rendering/view of such files to do the job for us.
We can still review the documents and have discussions on the content, and
provide access to all who wants to use it (to perform the merges).
The fact it uses markdown and images, can allow its content to be relocated
to any other solutions that will come later on, including adding the
content back on ovirt-site.

Here is a simple example:
https://github.com/EdDev/ovirt-devwiki/blob/initial-structure/index.md

it uses simple markdown md files with relative links to other pages. Adding
images is also simple.

What do you think?

Thanks,
Edy.



On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Michal Skrivanek <
michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On 16 Jan 2017, at 11:13, Roy Golan  wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11 January 2017 at 17:06, Marc Dequènes (Duck)  wrote:
>
>> Quack,
>>
>> On 01/08/2017 06:39 PM, Barak Korren wrote:
>> > On 8 January 2017 at 10:17, Roy Golan  wrote:
>> >> Adding infra which I forgot to add from the beginning
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> > I don't think this is an infra issue, more of a community/working
>> > procedures one.
>>
>> I do thin it is. We are involved in the tooling, for their maintenance,
>> for documenting where things are, for suggesting better solutions,
>> ensuring security…
>>
>> > On the one hand, the developers need a place where they create and
>> > discuss design documents and road maps. That please needs to be as
>> > friction-free as possible to allow developers to work on the code
>> > instead of on the documentation tools.
>>
>> As for code, I think there is need for review, even more for design
>> documents, so I don't see why people are bothered by PRs, which is a
>> tool they already know fairly well.
>>
>
> because it takes ages to get attention and get it in, even in cases when
> the text/update is more of an FYI and doesn’t require feedback.
> That leads to frustration, and that leads to loss of any motivation to
> contribute anything at all.
> You can see people posting on their own platforms, blogs, just to run away
> from this one
>
>
>> For people with few git knowledge, the GitHub web interface allows to
>> edit files.
>>
>> > On the other hand, the user community needs a good, up to date source
>> > of information about oVirt and how to use it.
>>
>> Yes, this official entry point and it needs to be clean.
>>
>
> yep, you’re right about the entry point -like pages
>
>
>> > Having said the above, I don't think the site project's wiki is the
>> > best place for this. The individual project mirrors on GitHub may be
>> > better for this
>>
>> We could indeed split the technical documentation. If people want to
>> experiment with the GH wiki pages, I won't interfere.
>>
>> I read several people in this thread really miss the old wiki, so I
>> think it is time to remember why we did not stay in paradise. I was not
>> there at the time, but I know the wiki was not well maintained. People
>> are comparing our situation to the MediaWiki site, but the workforce is
>> nowhere to be compared. There is already no community manager, and noone
>> is in charge of any part really, whereas Mediawiki has people in charge
>> of every corner of the wiki. Also they developed tools over years to
>> monitor, correct, revert… and we don't have any of this. So without any
>> process then it was a total mess. More than one year later there was
>> still much cleanup to do, and having contributed to it a little bit, I
>> fear a sentimental rush to go back to a solution that was abandoned.
>>
>
> it was also a bit difficult to edit, plus a barrier of ~1 month it took to
> get an account
>
>
>> Having a header telling if this is a draft or published is far from
>> being sufficient. If noone cares you just pile up content that gets
>> obsolete, then useless, then misleading for newcomers. You may prefer
>> review a posteriori, but in this case you need to have the proper tool
>> to be able to search for things to be reviewed, and a in-content
>> pseudo-header is really not an easy way to get a todolist.
>>
>> As for the current builder, it checks every minute for new content to
>> build. The current tool (Middleman) is a bit slow, and the machine is
>> not ultra speedy, but even in the worst case it should not take more
>> than half an hour to see the published result. So I don't know why
>> someone suggested to build "at least once a day". There is also an
>> experimentation to improve this part.
>>
>> So to sum up:
>>   - the most needed thing here is not a tool but people in charge to
>> review the content

Re: [ovirt-devel] UI Redesign patch has been merged.

2017-06-15 Thread Vojtech Szocs 
Excellent work, Alex!

Most of the patches are already in, just a couple remaining:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+topic:ui-redesign

Greg also fixed a memory leak caused by GWT-Platform framework bug:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78025/

As Jakub pointed out, replacing the "main & sub tab" concept with "main
(grid) view leading to details (tabbed) view" impacts existing UI
workflows, and the "entity actions available only from the main view" is
one of them. I remember this being discussed with UXD and it makes perfect
sense to have those actions available in details view as well, we'll
improve that.

Regards,
Vojtech


On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Alexander Wels  wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 2:49:55 PM EDT Jakub Niedermertl wrote:
> > Thanks Alex. It looks great!
> >
> > After a while of using the new design I feel it would be nice to have
> > context actions available not only on the list view but also on entity
> > detail. It feels natural for me to click on the entity I want to works
> > with, and after examining some details to perform an action. For example
> > start a VM, put Host to maintenance, or edit a Cluster.
> >
> > Is there any plan to make actions of context menu of entity listings
> > available also in entity detail page?
> >
> > Regards.
> > Jakub
> >
>
> Jakub,
>
> thanks, yes, in fact I am working with the UXD team on exactly that right
> now.
> The details not having the actions available will be one of the first
> things I
> will work on after I get my patch train all merged.
>
> Alexander
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Jorge Luis Andrade Escobar <
> >
> > jandr...@i-t-m.com> wrote:
> > > Looks great!!!
> > >
> > > Great work.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Yaniv Bronheim 
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >> Erray !! :P Great work
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:29 PM Alexander Wels 
> wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have just merged [1] which is a huge patch to update the look and
> feel
> > >>> of
> > >>> the webadmin UI to be more modern and based on Patternfly. I believe
> > >>> this is a
> > >>> huge step forward for the UI and should hopefully improve the
> usability
> > >>> and
> > >>> functionality of the UI (it certainly looks better).
> > >>>
> > >>> There are a bunch of follow up patches that once merged will make
> the UI
> > >>> look
> > >>> like [2]. It might take a few days for all of these patches to get
> into
> > >>> master. There are more enhancements planned to the usability of the
> UI
> > >>> as part
> > >>> of the overhaul process.
> > >>>
> > >>> As always, if there are any issues or comments let me know and I
> will be
> > >>> sure
> > >>> to address them ASAP.
> > >>>
> > >>> Alexander
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ps. You will have to clear your browser cache to get some of the
> > >>> formatting to
> > >>> look right.
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/75669/
> > >>> [2] http://imgur.com/a/JX0iG
> > >>> ___
> > >>> Devel mailing list
> > >>> Devel@ovirt.org
> > >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Yaniv Bronhaim.
> > >>
> > >> ___
> > >> Devel mailing list
> > >> Devel@ovirt.org
> > >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jorge Luis Andrade Escobar
> > > jandr...@i-t-m.com
> > > jandr...@itm.gt
> > > Red Hat Certified Architect (RHCA)
> > > Red Hat Certified Instructor/Examiner (RHCX)
> > > # 100-000-967
> > > gpg: 685C 68E8 9F55 771B ED7C 3CC7 5E65 8385 88D3 09A5
> > > Phone: +502 2305-0800 ext. 4005 <+502%202305%200800>
> > >
> > > http://www.i-t-m.com
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Devel mailing list
> > > Devel@ovirt.org
> > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] moVirt 2.0 RC 1 released!

2017-06-15 Thread Tomas Jelinek 
you can have only one version installed...

On 15 Jun 2017 5:25 pm, "Gianluca Cecchi"  wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Filip Krepinsky 
> wrote:
>
>> Hia,
>>
>> the first RC of moVirt 2.0 has been released!
>>
>> You can get it from our GitHub [1]; the play store will be upgraded
>> after considered stable.
>>
>> The main feature of this release is a support for managing multiple oVirt
>> installations from one moVirt.
>>
>
> Nice!
> Do I have to deinstall current one to test it or can I install both
> versions together?
>
> Gianluca
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> us...@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] moVirt 2.0 RC 1 released!

2017-06-15 Thread Gianluca Cecchi 
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Filip Krepinsky 
wrote:

> Hia,
>
> the first RC of moVirt 2.0 has been released!
>
> You can get it from our GitHub [1]; the play store will be upgraded after
> considered stable.
>
> The main feature of this release is a support for managing multiple oVirt
> installations from one moVirt.
>

Nice!
Do I have to deinstall current one to test it or can I install both
versions together?

Gianluca
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[ovirt-devel] moVirt 2.0 RC 1 released!

2017-06-15 Thread Filip Krepinsky 
Hia,

the first RC of moVirt 2.0 has been released!

You can get it from our GitHub [1]; the play store will be upgraded after
considered stable.

The main feature of this release is a support for managing multiple oVirt
installations from one moVirt.

Other changes:
- actions/lists/dashboard are now filtered by selecting accounts/clusters
in the left drawer
- event lists now correctly working for single vm, host, etc..
- better syncing and network detection
- cleaner ui design and connection settings
- enhanced security and support for certificates (import from file)
- sorting and filtering made more usable
- more descriptive errors
- other small enhancements and bug fixes


We would greatly appreciate if you could try it and share your feedback
with us. [2]
Let us know about any suggestions you might have; and as usual, patches are
also welcome :)

Have a great day

Filip


[1]:
https://github.com/oVirt/moVirt/releases/download/v2.0-rc1/moVirt-release.apk
[2]: https://github.com/oVirt/moVirt
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-system-tests] Failed after fluentd rpm ubdate

2017-06-15 Thread Sandro Bonazzola 
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola 
wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Rich Megginson 
> wrote:
>
>> I see this:
>>
>> 1.
>>Jun 14 12:26:01 lago-basic-suite-master-engine fluentd:
>>/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/dependency.rb:296:in `to_specs': Could
>>not find 'thread_safe' (~> 0.1) among 20 total gem(s) (Gem::LoadError)
>>
>> Missing rubygem fluentd packages or a problem with the dependencies?
>
>
> I think it's an issue in the dependencies:
> fluentd.spec:
>31 : BuildRequires: rubygem(thread_safe)
>
> Missing it in Requires.
> Pushing a fix.
>

https://review.rdoproject.org/r/7081



>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 06/14/2017 01:07 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
>>
>>> We have var logs:
>>>
>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_ma
>>> ster/7191/artifact/exported-artifacts/basic-suit-master-el7/
>>> test_logs/basic-suite-master/post-003_00_metrics_bootstrap.p
>>> y/lago-basic-suite-master-engine/
>>>
>>> I egreped fluentd from engine's host messages files:
>>>
>>> http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/493959
>>>
>>> On 06/14/2017 02:54 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>>


 On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Yedidyah Bar David > wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Gil Shinar > wrote:
 > This patch fixes the chgrp but not we see:
 >
 > Unable to start service fluentd: Job for fluentd.service failed
 because
 > start of the service was attempted too often

 Adding Shirly.

 Do we collect syslog (/var/log/messages or journalctl)? If so, we
 can try
 to see why it fails.


 Adding also Richard who may be interested on this.


 >
 >
 > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Yedidyah Bar David
 >
 > wrote:
 >>
 >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Valentina Makarova
 >> > wrote:
 >> > Hello!
 >> >
 >> > Fluentd packages was modified yesterday there
 >> >
 >> >
 http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot-static/
 rpm/el7/noarch/
 
 >> > This repository is referenced in reposync-config.
 >> >
 >> > And now run_suile.sh failed in 003_00_metrics_bootstrap test
 with error:
 >> >  TASK [fluentd : Ensure fluentd configuration directory exists]
 >> > * fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"changed":
 false,
 >> > "failed": true, "gid": 0, "group": "root", "mode": "0755",
 "msg": "chgrp
 >> > failed: failed to look up group fluentd"
 >> >
 >> > And the same error on host0 and hos1.
 >> >
 >> > Does anyone know how to fix it?
 >>
 >> Should be fixed by [1]. Either wait for the repos to be
 updated or install
 >> the update from jenkins (link to it inside [1]).
 >>
 >> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78140/
 
 >>
 >> >
 >> > Sincerely, Valentina Makarova
 >> >
 >> >
 >> > ___
 >> > Devel mailing list
 >> > Devel@ovirt.org 
 >> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> --
 >> Didi
 >> ___
 >> Devel mailing list
 >> Devel@ovirt.org 
 >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
 >
 >



 --
 Didi
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@ovirt.org 
 http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 




 --

 SANDRO BONAZZOLA

 ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R

 Red Hat EMEA 

 
 TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. 



 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@ovirt.org
 http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>
> ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R
>
> Red Hat EMEA 
> 
>

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-system-tests] Failed after fluentd rpm ubdate

2017-06-15 Thread Sandro Bonazzola 
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Rich Megginson  wrote:

> I see this:
>
> 1.
>Jun 14 12:26:01 lago-basic-suite-master-engine fluentd:
>/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/dependency.rb:296:in `to_specs': Could
>not find 'thread_safe' (~> 0.1) among 20 total gem(s) (Gem::LoadError)
>
> Missing rubygem fluentd packages or a problem with the dependencies?


I think it's an issue in the dependencies:
fluentd.spec:
   31 : BuildRequires: rubygem(thread_safe)

Missing it in Requires.
Pushing a fix.



>
>
>
> On 06/14/2017 01:07 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
>
>> We have var logs:
>>
>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_ma
>> ster/7191/artifact/exported-artifacts/basic-suit-master-el7/
>> test_logs/basic-suite-master/post-003_00_metrics_bootstrap.
>> py/lago-basic-suite-master-engine/
>>
>> I egreped fluentd from engine's host messages files:
>>
>> http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/493959
>>
>> On 06/14/2017 02:54 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Yedidyah Bar David >> > wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Gil Shinar >> > wrote:
>>> > This patch fixes the chgrp but not we see:
>>> >
>>> > Unable to start service fluentd: Job for fluentd.service failed
>>> because
>>> > start of the service was attempted too often
>>>
>>> Adding Shirly.
>>>
>>> Do we collect syslog (/var/log/messages or journalctl)? If so, we
>>> can try
>>> to see why it fails.
>>>
>>>
>>> Adding also Richard who may be interested on this.
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Yedidyah Bar David
>>> >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Valentina Makarova
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > Hello!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Fluentd packages was modified yesterday there
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot-static/
>>> rpm/el7/noarch/
>>> >> /rpm/el7/noarch/>
>>> >> > This repository is referenced in reposync-config.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > And now run_suile.sh failed in 003_00_metrics_bootstrap test
>>> with error:
>>> >> >  TASK [fluentd : Ensure fluentd configuration directory exists]
>>> >> > * fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"changed":
>>> false,
>>> >> > "failed": true, "gid": 0, "group": "root", "mode": "0755",
>>> "msg": "chgrp
>>> >> > failed: failed to look up group fluentd"
>>> >> >
>>> >> > And the same error on host0 and hos1.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Does anyone know how to fix it?
>>> >>
>>> >> Should be fixed by [1]. Either wait for the repos to be
>>> updated or install
>>> >> the update from jenkins (link to it inside [1]).
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78140/
>>> 
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Sincerely, Valentina Makarova
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ___
>>> >> > Devel mailing list
>>> >> > Devel@ovirt.org 
>>> >> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>> 
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Didi
>>> >> ___
>>> >> Devel mailing list
>>> >> Devel@ovirt.org 
>>> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>> 
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Didi
>>> ___
>>> Devel mailing list
>>> Devel@ovirt.org 
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>>>
>>> ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R
>>>
>>> Red Hat EMEA 
>>>
>>> 
>>> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Devel mailing list
>>> Devel@ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R

Red Hat EMEA 

TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. 
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java 4.0.0 has been released upstream

2017-06-15 Thread Sandro Bonazzola 
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Juan Hernández  wrote:

> On 06/15/2017 08:36 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > Hi,
> > just an heads up that a new release of UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java is
> > available upstream.
> > I'm going to build it for Fedora Rawhide, please let me know if we need
> > it for 4.2, requiring a backport to Fedora 25 / 26 and EL7 or if it can
> > just stay in Rawhide for ovirt >= 4.3 consumption.
> >
> > Here the release
> > notes: https://github.com/pingidentity/ldapsdk/releases/tag/4.0.0
> >
> > Fedora tracking bug: Bug 1461604
> >  -
> unboundid-ldapsdk-4.0.0
> > is available
> >
> > Thanks,
>
> Is 4.0 backwards compatible with 3.y.z? Should it be a new whatever4
> package?
>

AFAIK the major change is that now it requires Java >= 1.7, dropping
support for 1.5 and 1.6.
Also add support for Java 9.


-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R

Red Hat EMEA 

TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. 
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-system-tests] Failed after fluentd rpm ubdate

2017-06-15 Thread Rich Megginson 

On 06/14/2017 11:42 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:

Adding infra as well.
Currently, master OST is still failing on this.

http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master/7189/testReport/

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Sandro Bonazzola > wrote:




On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Yedidyah Bar David
> wrote:

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Gil Shinar
> wrote:
> This patch fixes the chgrp but not we see:
>
> Unable to start service fluentd: Job for fluentd.service
failed because
> start of the service was attempted too often

Adding Shirly.

Do we collect syslog (/var/log/messages or journalctl)? If so,
we can try
to see why it fails.


Adding also Richard who may be interested on this.



Yes.   If you run fluentd as a systemd service fluentd.service, then you 
can use journalctl -u fluentd to see the logs.




>
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Yedidyah Bar David
>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Valentina Makarova
>> > wrote:
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > Fluentd packages was modified yesterday there
>> >
>> >

http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot-static/rpm/el7/noarch/


>> > This repository is referenced in reposync-config.
>> >
>> > And now run_suile.sh failed in 003_00_metrics_bootstrap
test with error:
>> >  TASK [fluentd : Ensure fluentd configuration directory
exists]
>> > * fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! =>
{"changed": false,
>> > "failed": true, "gid": 0, "group": "root", "mode":
"0755", "msg": "chgrp
>> > failed: failed to look up group fluentd"
>> >
>> > And the same error on host0 and hos1.
>> >
>> > Does anyone know how to fix it?
>>
>> Should be fixed by [1]. Either wait for the repos to be
updated or install
>> the update from jenkins (link to it inside [1]).
>>
>> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78140/

>>
>> >
>> > Sincerely, Valentina Makarova
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Devel mailing list
>> > Devel@ovirt.org 
>> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Didi
>> ___
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel@ovirt.org 
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

>
>



--
Didi
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org 
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





-- 


SANDRO BONAZZOLA

ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R

Red Hat EMEA 

  
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. 


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org 
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





--

Eyal edri


ASSOCIATE MANAGER

RHV DevOps

EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R


Red Hat EMEA 

 	TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. 



phone: +972-9-7692018
irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)



___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-system-tests] Failed after fluentd rpm ubdate

2017-06-15 Thread Rich Megginson 

I see this:

1.
   Jun 14 12:26:01 lago-basic-suite-master-engine fluentd:
   /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/dependency.rb:296:in `to_specs': Could
   not find 'thread_safe' (~> 0.1) among 20 total gem(s) (Gem::LoadError)

Missing rubygem fluentd packages or a problem with the dependencies?


On 06/14/2017 01:07 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:

We have var logs:

http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master/7191/artifact/exported-artifacts/basic-suit-master-el7/test_logs/basic-suite-master/post-003_00_metrics_bootstrap.py/lago-basic-suite-master-engine/

I egreped fluentd from engine's host messages files:

http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/493959

On 06/14/2017 02:54 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:



On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Yedidyah Bar David > wrote:


On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Gil Shinar > wrote:
> This patch fixes the chgrp but not we see:
>
> Unable to start service fluentd: Job for fluentd.service failed
because
> start of the service was attempted too often

Adding Shirly.

Do we collect syslog (/var/log/messages or journalctl)? If so, we
can try
to see why it fails.


Adding also Richard who may be interested on this.


>
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Yedidyah Bar David
>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Valentina Makarova
>> > wrote:
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > Fluentd packages was modified yesterday there
>> >
>> >
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot-static/rpm/el7/noarch/


>> > This repository is referenced in reposync-config.
>> >
>> > And now run_suile.sh failed in 003_00_metrics_bootstrap test
with error:
>> >  TASK [fluentd : Ensure fluentd configuration directory exists]
>> > * fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"changed":
false,
>> > "failed": true, "gid": 0, "group": "root", "mode": "0755",
"msg": "chgrp
>> > failed: failed to look up group fluentd"
>> >
>> > And the same error on host0 and hos1.
>> >
>> > Does anyone know how to fix it?
>>
>> Should be fixed by [1]. Either wait for the repos to be
updated or install
>> the update from jenkins (link to it inside [1]).
>>
>> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78140/

>>
>> >
>> > Sincerely, Valentina Makarova
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Devel mailing list
>> > Devel@ovirt.org 
>> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Didi
>> ___
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel@ovirt.org 
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

>
>



--
Didi
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org 
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





--

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R

Red Hat EMEA 

  
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. 



___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] Removal of Export Storage Domain and virt-v2v

2017-06-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones 
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:52:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Yaniv wrote:
> > And indeed, we won't deprecate it without a suitable replacement.
> > While you can already upload disks, we are working towards upload/download
> > of VMs.
> > See
> > http://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/virt/enhance-import-export-with-ova/
> 
> My concern with this (if I've understood it correctly) is it's going
> to be slow and require considerable extra storage on the conversion
> server.
> 
> At the moment -- using NFS -- we can stream from VMware to oVirt,
> requiring almost no local storage on the conversion server.

Thinking about this overnight, another way to do this would be to
allow the import of "OVA directories".  OVA doesn't need to be packed
into a tarball, the standard allows an OVA to be an unpacked directory
(directory containing disk images + OVF file).

Create a ‘/import’ directory on the NFS server, and allow OVA
directories to be uploaded to there.  We could stream the disk content
as now.

Then provide a REST API to import an OVA (directory) from /import on
the NFS server to complete to operation.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java 4.0.0 has been released upstream

2017-06-15 Thread Martin Perina 
AFAIK we don't need any new features or bug fixes, so we can stay with
version 3.x for 4.2.

Thanks

Martin

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Juan Hernández  wrote:

> On 06/15/2017 08:36 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > Hi,
> > just an heads up that a new release of UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java is
> > available upstream.
> > I'm going to build it for Fedora Rawhide, please let me know if we need
> > it for 4.2, requiring a backport to Fedora 25 / 26 and EL7 or if it can
> > just stay in Rawhide for ovirt >= 4.3 consumption.
> >
> > Here the release
> > notes: https://github.com/pingidentity/ldapsdk/releases/tag/4.0.0
> >
> > Fedora tracking bug: Bug 1461604
> >  -
> unboundid-ldapsdk-4.0.0
> > is available
> >
> > Thanks,
>
> Is 4.0 backwards compatible with 3.y.z? Should it be a new whatever4
> package?
>
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java 4.0.0 has been released upstream

2017-06-15 Thread Juan Hernández 
On 06/15/2017 08:36 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Hi,
> just an heads up that a new release of UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java is
> available upstream.
> I'm going to build it for Fedora Rawhide, please let me know if we need
> it for 4.2, requiring a backport to Fedora 25 / 26 and EL7 or if it can
> just stay in Rawhide for ovirt >= 4.3 consumption.
> 
> Here the release
> notes: https://github.com/pingidentity/ldapsdk/releases/tag/4.0.0
> 
> Fedora tracking bug: Bug 1461604
>  - 
> unboundid-ldapsdk-4.0.0
> is available
> 
> Thanks,

Is 4.0 backwards compatible with 3.y.z? Should it be a new whatever4
package?
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[ovirt-devel] UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java 4.0.0 has been released upstream

2017-06-15 Thread Sandro Bonazzola 
Hi,
just an heads up that a new release of UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java is
available upstream.
I'm going to build it for Fedora Rawhide, please let me know if we need it
for 4.2, requiring a backport to Fedora 25 / 26 and EL7 or if it can just
stay in Rawhide for ovirt >= 4.3 consumption.

Here the release notes:
https://github.com/pingidentity/ldapsdk/releases/tag/4.0.0

Fedora tracking bug: Bug 1461604
 - unboundid-ldapsdk-4.0.0
is available

Thanks,
-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R

Red Hat EMEA 

TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. 
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel