On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Our QE (and sometimes our users) are working hard testing and
> reporting bugs, but
> their effort is never mentioned in our code.
>
> Looking at kernel git history, I found that they are using the
> Reported-By
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:56 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> nah, i prefer not using arc welder :(
>
As already mentioned in the thread, perhaps Boxes can do the job, at least
on Gnome.
See http://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/10/gnome-boxes-3-14-unboxed/ and
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Tomas Jelinek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there is an effort for enhancing the speed and convergence of the migrations
> (especially for large VMs).
>
> The feature page targeted for 4.0 is [1].
>
> TL;DR:
> - remove current logic from VDSM and move
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Alexander Wels wrote:
> TL;DR
> Don't extend the User Portal use the REST api to do what you need to do and
> determine which SDK works the best for your needs.
>
I'd actually bring up a complete proposal first to the list - perhaps the
use
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Martin Betak wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Marek Libra"
> > To: "Martin Perina"
> > Cc: "Piotr Kliczewski" , "Michal Skrivanek" <
> mskri...@redhat.com>,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Francesco Romani
wrote:
> Using taskset, the ip command now takes a little longer to complete.
Since we always use the same set of CPUs, I assume using a mask (for 0 & 1,
just use 0x3, as the man suggests) might be a tiny of a fraction
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Nir Soffer <nsof...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Francesco Romani <from...@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
>
+ Sahina.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Yuko Katabami wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to ask for your help with the following question.
>
> *File: *ApplicationMessages
>
> *Resource IDs: *
>
> brickStatusWithUnSyncedEntriesPresent needsGlusterHealingWithVolumeStatus
>
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> > Do we understand why they fail randomly?
>
> Could be due to dirty slave state.
>
> > Is it possible to make them reliable in mock?
>
> Mock will not help here as it only does FS isolation.
>
> We are working on a
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while I appreciate all the work
> that has been done for this release, please
> let me add some critic:
>
> on the old website it was pretty easy to track
> down what exactly changed between each release
>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Sven Kieske <s.kie...@mittwald.de> wrote:
> On 22/06/16 09:50, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > It's harder to do for minor releases, as they don't have distinct target
> > milestones as major versions do.
> > For example, 4.0 has 4.0.0-rc1
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Eyal Edri <ee...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Eyal Edri <ee...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> After the recent merge of testing install of ovirt-cockpit-dashboard to
> 3.6,
> the 4.0 tests failed also. [1]
>
They should not have failed. The only reason they could have failed is if
there were added deps - and there
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Moran Goldboim
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Moran Goldboim
>> wrote:
>>
>>> my pov - really depends on when do
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Alexander Wels wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Somewhere during master upgrades somehow my admin@internal did not get
> permissions to create VMs. Its is compiling about no permissions to assign
> a
> CPU profile. Its been a while since I tried creating a VM.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Martin Polednik
wrote:
> On 27/01/16 09:53 +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Yedidyah Bar David
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>>
e_Notes
> [2] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.6.1_Release_Notes
> [3] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.6.2_Release_Notes
> [4] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.6.z_Release_Management
> [5] http://www.ovirt.org/Install_nightly_snapshot
> [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297835
>
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Yaniv Bronheim wrote:
> Hi,
> I added recently to check-merged phase a job for automatic functional test
> run. see for example
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-merged-fc23-x86_64/52/
>
Excellent!
>
>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Marek Libra wrote:
> Please see attachments.
>
Needs adjustments to match the look and feel of the planned dashboards /
cockpit, but otherwise - looks great! Kudos for the idea!
Y.
>
> The main page (see cockpit_vmsList.png) shows all
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> oVirt 3.6
> -
> We noticed that Node is using the rpms from the oVirt master branches, which
> makes it a bit unstable. We plan to switch to consume oVirt 3.6 rpms.
Can you clarify this?
Y.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Yaniv Bronheim wrote:
> (Nir, Adam, YanivB, Dan, Milan, Piotr, Francesco, Martin Polednik, Edward)
>
> - Some of us started to work on refactoring for python3, basic file
> movements and improving testings
>
> - We added functional tests to
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Вячеслав Бадалян wrote:
> Hello.
Hi - please join the devel or users mailing list.
>
> ZERO) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=ovirt
> Sorry, entering a bug into the product oVirt has been disabled
We were promoted to a
Answer to self: sent https://github.com/lago-project/lago/pull/169 to
overcome those empty files in Lago.
Y.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbona...@redhat.com
> <https://mail.
=1=1=d...@redhat.com>>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com
>> <https://mail.google.com/mail/?view=cm=1=1=yk...@redhat.com>>
>> wrote:
>> > I can find it @
>> >
>> http://rsync.nl.gentoo.org/pub/soft
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:23 PM, David Caro wrote:
> On 04/06 14:19, Edward Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Milan Zamazal
> wrote:
> >
> > > Edward Haas writes:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Milan Zamazal
Cloning VDSM with the following command:
git clone -b master --depth 1 git://gerrit.ovirt.org/vdsm
Which works, but then I can't run ./autogen.sh succesfully:
mini@ykaul-mini:/tmp/github/vdsmshallow$ ./autogen.sh |less
fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything.
fatal: No names found,
Probably fails because of:
git describe
fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Cloning VDSM with the following command:
> git clone -b master --depth 1 git://gerrit.ovirt.org/vdsm
>
> Which
hould beat it always.
In any case, perhaps I should clone from Github...
Y.
> Nir
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Probably fails because of:
> > git describe
> > fatal: No names found, cannot describe anyt
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Nir Soffer <nsof...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbona...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:02 PM, David Caro wrote:
> Though you will not have any caching and zram execution (just as the
> jenkins
> slaves don't have it).
>
That should change. The sooner the better.
If they have enough ram, they can actually run in /dev/shm/something.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:05 PM, David Caro <dc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/10 20:52, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Eyal Edri <ee...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > test_logs/
> >
> >
> > This is an annoying change
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> A weekly reminder on open bugs & patches to keep track on blockers for
> oVirt testing:
>
>
> *Open bugs:*
> https://goo.gl/eUaPUY
>
> *Open issues:*
> Still suffering from add host failures, pending a fix from network team:
>
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> test_logs/
This is an annoying change of behavior. In the past, I believe the logs
were under the deployment dir. Now, they are here. It requires cleaning
them manually every time.
It's part of issues we'll have to fix if we
I can't find EL7 RPMs under the above path.
They used to be there...
TIA,
Y.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
> On 07/04/16 10:14, Shahar Havivi wrote:
> > Any suggestions/notes?
> >
> Very cool feature, but
> I have a question:
>
> Would it be possible to tunnel this through ssh or other
> TCP Connections over the network?
>
If
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Sunny Shin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In the new architecture page (
> http://www.ovirt.org/documentation/architecture/architecture/), overall
> architecture picture shows that engine supports active-active high
> availability.
>
This is
>
> 2016-03-04 17:38 GMT+09:00 Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Sunny Shin <sunny4s@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> In the new architecture page (
>>> http:/
s - to be fixed in https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/pull/116
Y.
>
> Some BZ added 1313584 1313585 1313586 1313588 1313583
> Thanks for life link to project BZ
>
>
>
> вт, 1 мар. 2016 г. в 23:23, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com>:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 201
I can find it @
http://rsync.nl.gentoo.org/pub/software/ovirt/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el7Workstation/noarch/ovirt-release-master-4.0.0-0.1.master.20160304151417.gita200923.noarch.rpm
I can't find it @
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot-static/rpm/el7Workstation/noarch/
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Yaniv Bronheim
> wrote:
> > I don't think this package is available in epel. if not, just remove it
> from
> > py3 list
> >
> > about why we didn't catch it in
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Yaniv Bronheim wrote:
> *VDSM call 17/5/2016*
>
> mzamzal, mpolednik, edwardh, danken, ybronhei, igoihman, nsoffer, pkliczew
>
> *mzamza* -
> * Working on debian support to run vms. still experimental. Milan will
> send elaborated mail about
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Piotr Kliczewski
wrote:
> Nir,
>
> The warnings were added to annoy people so we could keep the schema align
> with the code.
> I think that we should use this opportunity to push fixes instead of
> disabling it.
>
I agree to the end goal,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:32 PM, David Caro wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
>
> I'm having some issues when trying to run the ovirt system tests from ovirt
> master branch, and I need some help from you guys.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328011
Y.
>
> The issue
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Eldad Marciano
wrote:
> Hi Lynn
>
> Thats know issue but nothing to worry about.
>
> It looks like you have nice amount of RAM
>
> Engine and dwh calculating the total ram size of the host and set 1/4 of
> it as heap space
>
Without an
Yes, especially in Lago / ovirt-system-tests, which doesn't REALLY use it,
we should first try it there to ensure no dependency issues.
Y.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
wrote:
> Hi,
> currently we're building and composing master (will become 4.1)
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Evgheni Dereveanchin
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We have the test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master job failing since build
> 717:
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master/717/
>
> System tests are also starting to fail:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Sandro Bonazzola
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Greg Sheremeta
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I actually have a patch on it right now. It'll be done this week.
>>
>> In prep, I made
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Michal Skrivanek <
michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 07 Jul 2016, at 08:54, Tomas Jelinek <tjeli...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -
> >> From: "Yaniv Kaul"
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> >
> >
> > It means that packages will be fetched EVERY time from outside, which
> may be
> > slow(er).
> > Y.
> >
>
> We can (and mostly already have) setup simple caches to prevent that.
>
How do you set up cache on a
Caused by: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: insert or update on
table "host_device" violates foreign key constraint
"fk_host_device_parent_name"
Detail: Key (host_id,
parent_device_name)=(767142d5-6242-4bb1-bcbd-095595c3b7f1, scsi_host2) is
not present in table "host_device".
at
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Barak Korren wrote:
> >> Maybe we can take a middle ground, pre-fetch, but also enable external
> >> repos in CI (perhaps with some way to log and find out what was not
> >> pre-fetched).
> >
> > This is what the code is supposed to do, I
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Barak Korren <bkor...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 29 June 2016 at 21:45, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Barak Korren <bkor...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >>
On Feb 5, 2017 1:58 PM, "Marc Young" <3vilpeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
I see emails floating around about Jenkins.
Is there a public Jenkins, or possibly one that I can be invited to?
I just finished the vagrant provider and
Excellent news - saw it on twitter!
Can you send an email to the users
+Nir
On Feb 6, 2017 10:12 AM, "Sahina Bose" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While verifying the test to deploy hyperconverged HE [1], I'm running into
> an issue today where vdsm fails to start.
>
> In the logs -
> lago-basic-suite-hc-host0 vdsmd_init_common.sh: Error:
> Feb 6
Just below [1], something is a bit messed up.
TIA,
Y.
[1]
http://ovirt.github.io/ovirt-engine-api-model/master/#services/attached_storage_domain_disks
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Piotr Kliczewski <
piotr.kliczew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Fred Rolland wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see some issues in the communication between host0 and the the engine.
> > Vdsm returned the answer to call
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:06 PM Francesco Romani wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
> in the last weeks I've been submitting PRs to collectd upstream, to
> bring the virt plugin up to date with Vdsm and oVirt needs.
>
> Previously, the collectd virt plugin reported only a subset of
On Jan 19, 2017 4:59 PM, "Marc Young" <3vilpeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there any way to suggest new packages be baked into the openstack
glance images?
Ie. the ovirt-guest-agent is missing from the atomic images, and
pretty tough to install given that gcc, make, yum, and pretty much
everything
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Anton Marchukov
wrote:
> Hello Shirly.
>
> Thanks for your fix. No. Today there are no things of dwh related failures
> in both master and 4.1
>
Would be great if it could be published, so us mere mortals could enjoy the
fix and run o-s-t as
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Tomas Jelinek wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, we still have 2 approved blockers:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=target_m
>>
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:04 PM Shlomo Ben David
wrote:
Hi,
Test failed: [ test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master ]
Link to Job: [1]
Link to all logs: [2]
Link to error log: [3]
[1] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master/5538
[2]
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Pavel Zhukov wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 02 2017, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> >
> >> ovirt-engine-hosts-ansible-inventory has been dropped in favor of
> >>
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:40 AM Yedidyah Bar David <d...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM Yedidyah Bar David <d...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>
can publish it to the nightlies and
> rerun the tests.
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Juan Hernández <jhern...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 09/05/2016 08:43 PM, Rafael Martins wrote:
>> > - Original Message -
>> >> From: "Juan Hernández" &l
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Juan Hernández <jhern...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/02/2016 02:00 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com
> > <mailto:yk...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Shlomo Ben David
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today 04/09/2016 at 23:00 i'm planning to update gerrit-oauth plugin from v0.3
> ==> v2.11.3
>
> In addition i will add the new avatars-gravatar plugin (v2.11)
>
Does it affect the performance? It looks very
Log:
2016-09-02 07:26:52::ERROR::hypervisors::197::root:: Failure fetching
information about hypervisors from API.
Error (ValueError): legacy is not a valid RngSource
2016-09-02 07:26:52::ERROR::__main__::1147::root::
_get_hypervisors_from_api: legacy is not a valid RngSource
2016-09-02
Indeed, this is the log collector. I wonder if we collect its logs...
Y.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> I'm pretty sure lago or ovirt system tests aren't doing it but its the log
> collector which is running during that test, I'm not near a computer so
>
I'm sure it was less just days ago, but now[1] it is again quite big.
4.0's is 'only' 1G in size[2].
Which anyway raises the question - should we provide delta RPMs for it?
Thanks,
Y.
[1]
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Sandro Bonazzola
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Juan Hernández
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/04/2016 03:16 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> > Hi, I'm checking the packaging of ovirt-engine for 4.1 and I've some
>>
Hi,
We have a very interesting testing framework[1] and tests[2] for oVirt.
The framework, Lago, is using nested virtualization (a VM within a VM,
running on a host - two levels of virtualization) to completely virtualize
an oVirt environment - a manager and hosts.
I suggest you first try to run
On Sep 28, 2016 11:37 PM, "Nir Soffer" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Barak Korren
wrote:
> >> The CI setup did not change recently.
> >
> > Great
> >
> >> All
sing. On my case it doubles the performance, at least.
But I assume my storage (single disk) is far slower than yours.
Y.
>
> Regards,
> Evgheni Dereveanchin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Eyal Edri" <ee...@redhat.com>
> To: "Nir Soffer"
and I'll
> check what's going on but it must be something else than RAM disks.
>
> Regards,
> Evgheni Dereveanchin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Yaniv Kaul" <yk...@redhat.com>
> To: "Evgheni Dereveanchin" <edere...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "i
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Anton Marchukov
wrote:
>
>> > The node will be offline for now until we agree on what to do.
>> > An option is to abandon RAM disks completely as we didn't find
>> > any performance benefits from using them so far.
>>
>> That's very
@NotNull annotation on
>>>> schedule, but ampyrically it does, as removing it solves the issue.
>>>> I've posted https://gerrit.ovirt.org/65784 to do so - please review
>>>> (or suggest a better solution, of course :-))
>>>>
>>>> T
rt/ovirt-system-tests/blob/
> master/basic_suite_master/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py#L490
> [3] https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-system-tests/blob/
> master/basic_suite_master/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py#L243
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbona.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Nadav Goldin <ngol...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Not exactly.
>
> My bad, missed that the tests run in parallel, though what this means
> is that 'ovir
g",1479290132000],"token_type":"bearer"}
And here's the difference between the SDK and the manual curl command in
ssl_access log:
192.168.201.1 - - [09/Nov/2016:04:52:19 -0500] "POST
/ovirt-engine/sso/oauth/token HTTP/1.1" 404 74
192.168.201.1 - - [09/Nov/20
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Michal Skrivanek
wrote:
>
>
> > On 08 Nov 2016, at 17:52, Martin Sivak wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > mom-vdsm.service contains:
> >
> > Requires=vdsmd.service
> > After=vdsmd.service
> >
> > So when Shira restarted vdsm, mom
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Juan Hernández <jhern...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/09/2016 11:12 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Ravi Nori <rn...@redhat.com
> > <mailto:rn...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
m-tests on Lago installation, nothing out of
the ordinary, but I'll check.
Y.
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Ravi Nori <rn...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Stuart Gott wrote:
> All,
>
> We're working on a script that stands up an oVirt Engine and adds a node
> to it. The issue is we don't know how long to wait before trying to add a
> node. What we're doing right now is to check the status of the
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Juan Hernández <jhern...@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 10/13/2016 12:04 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com
> > <mailto:yk...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying on
1. I can't find 4.1 @ resources.ovirt.org. I'm quite sure I did, at some
point.
2. In ovirt-system-tests, when reposync'ing 4.0 and master, seems that 4.0
has a newer build than master?
./ovirt-4.0-snapshot-el7/x86_64/python-ovirt-engine-sdk4-4.
0.2-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Piotr Kliczewski <
piotr.kliczew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I noticed that on Friday the problem do not occur but we have a
> different one [1] which could be related to storage as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> [1]
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
wrote:
> Hi,
> we have more than 300 patches failing continuous integration after being
> merged[1]
> Is anybody monitoring what's happening there?
> Have we broken check-merge tests?
> Have we auto rebase on merge
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbona...@redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> As I try to upgrade to FC25, it is actually suggest to downgrade
>> my ovirt-engine-sdk-python to
As I try to upgrade to FC25, it is actually suggest to downgrade
my ovirt-engine-sdk-python to 3.6.3.0-2.fc25 - while I am happily running
with ovirt-engine-sdk-python-3.6.9.1-1.fc24.noarch
Do we need to rebuild for F25?
___
Devel mailing list
I've recently seen, including now on Master, the following warnings:
Nov 17 13:33:25 lago-basic-suite-master-host0 systemd[1]: Started MOM
instance configured for VDSM purposes.
Nov 17 13:33:25 lago-basic-suite-master-host0 systemd[1]: Starting MOM
instance configured for VDSM purposes...
Nov 17
tatus to be updated in
Engine back to UP state.
Y.
> >> begin captured logging <<
>
>
> [1]
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master/3506/testReport/junit/(root)/006_network_by_label/assign_hosts_n
On Nov 20, 2016 6:33 PM, "Nir Soffer" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> > It happened again in [1]
> >
> > 2016-11-20 10:48:12,106 ERROR (jsonrpc/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task]
> > (Task='6c1ec6e7-fb37-465b-8e30-1613317683b2')
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Francesco Romani
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the last 2.5 days I was exploring if and how we can integrate collectd
> and Vdsm.
>
> The final picture could look like:
> 1. collectd does all the monitoring and reporting currently Vdsm does
> 2.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm trying on FC24, using python-ovirt-engine-sdk4-4.1.0
> -0.0.20161003git056315d.fc24.x86_64 to add a DC, and failing - against
> master. The client is unhappy:
> File
> "/home/ykaul/ovirt-syste
:443/ovirt-engine/sso;
ENGINE_SSO_SERVICE_SSL_VERIFY_HOST=false
ENGINE_SSO_SERVICE_SSL_VERIFY_CHAIN=true
SSO_ALTERNATE_ENGINE_FQDNS=""
SSO_ENGINE_URL="https://${ENGINE_FQDN}:443/ovirt-engine/;
Thanks,
Y.
>
> Thanks
>
> Ravi
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:
It appears that VDSM changes the following params:
vm.dirty_ratio = 5
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 2
Any idea why? Because we use cache=none it's irrelevant anyway?
TIA,
Y.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
> On 29/11/16 15:54, Martin Sivak wrote:
> > I actually checked the oVirt 4.0.0 and 4.0.5 release notes and I do
> > not see anything mentioning ovirt-cli or REST v3 deprecation. This
> > will (removal of RESTv3 support)
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Shlomo Ben David
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The [1] job fails with the following errors:
>
> *12:34:20 [31mError while running thread
> 12:34:20 Traceback (most recent call last):
> 12:34:20 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/lago/utils.py",
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Shlomo Ben David <sbend...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The [1] job fails with the following errors:
>>
>> *12:34:20 [
See [1]:
+ yum install --nogpgcheck -y --downloaddir=/dev/shm ovirt-engine
ovirt-log-collector 'ovirt-engine-extension-aaa-ldap*'*13:55:25*
Error: Package:
ovirt-engine-backend-4.0.7-0.0.master.20161208233116.git3dff5ce.el7.centos.noarch
(alocalsync)*13:55:25*Requires:
1 - 100 of 373 matches
Mail list logo