- Original Message -
From: Martin Sivak msi...@redhat.com
To: Sven Kieske s.kie...@mittwald.de
Cc: devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:27:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug
Hi,
Why should an incomplete, thus non
Why should an incomplete, thus non working feature get merged?
Do you also merge incomplete bugfixes?
One commit should contain one feature or one bugfix, imho?
I know this can be difficult sometimes, but still, at least
in the master branch this rule should get enforced, maybe create
a staging
- Original Message -
From: Yedidyah Bar David d...@redhat.com
To: Sven Kieske s.kie...@mittwald.de
Cc: devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 11:08:52 AM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug
That is not a bad idea, but there is one
- Original Message -
From: Sven Kieske s.kie...@mittwald.de
To: devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:01:50 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug
Why should an incomplete, thus non working feature get merged?
Adding a feature
On Thursday, August 28, 2014 01:37:13 PM David Caro wrote:
On 08/27, Martin Sivak wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask if it might be possible for the gerrit hook to stop
giving -1 to patches that do not have bug-url, but have related-to.
The reason for this is that I have a rather large
- Original Message -
From: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com
To: Martin Sivak msi...@redhat.com
Cc: devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 2:59:03 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug
On Thursday, August 28, 2014 01:37:13 PM David
Message -
- Original Message -
From: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com
To: Martin Sivak msi...@redhat.com
Cc: devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 2:59:03 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug
On Thursday, August 28, 2014
- Original Message -
From: Martin Sivak msi...@redhat.com
To: Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com
Cc: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com, devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:22:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug
Why can't you put
-
- Original Message -
From: Martin Sivak msi...@redhat.com
To: Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com
Cc: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com, devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:22:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug
Why can't you put
- Original Message -
From: Martin Sivak msi...@redhat.com
To: Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com
Cc: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com, devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:53:53 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug
What if gerrit used
Sivak msi...@redhat.com
To: Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com
Cc: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com, devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:53:53 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug
What if gerrit used the dependency info and would not -1
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Martin Sivak msi...@redhat.com
To: Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com
Cc: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com, devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:53:53 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook
On Aug 28, 2014, at 16:14 , Martin Sivak msi...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
yeah I think it should be like that.
+1
* Should it pass the same checks than a Bug-Url?
Most probably yes
Right now that is:
- Public
- Target release
- Product
* Should it change the bug statuses
Hi,
yeah I think it should be like that.
* Should it pass the same checks than a Bug-Url?
Most probably yes
Right now that is:
- Public
- Target release
- Product
* Should it change the bug statuses too?
Most probably no
* Should it update the external trackers of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
