Re: [riot-devel] replace printf, puts issue

2015-02-26 Thread Ludwig Ortmann
Hi, Yes, we came to the same conclusion while driving to embedded world. I've got the implementation and API specification ready as well and will open a PR later. Cheers, Ludwig Am 27. Februar 2015 02:14:51 MEZ, schrieb Jozef Maslik ma...@binarylemon.com: Hi, Yes compiler do not optimize

Re: [riot-devel] LGPL compliance testing

2015-02-26 Thread Murat CAKMAK
Hi Ludwig, Pull request link : https://github.com/cakmakmurat2000/RIOT/pull/1 It is my first GIT experience. I might miss something :) Regards. -Original Message- From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@riot-os.org] On Behalf Of Ludwig Ortmann Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 8:32 AM To:

Re: [riot-devel] LGPL compliance testing

2015-02-26 Thread Martine Lenders
Hi Murat, You made the PR to your own repository. You have to open a Pull Request to our repository. Hope I could help, Martine 2015-02-26 16:56 GMT+01:00 Murat CAKMAK m...@muratcakmak.net: Hi Ludwig, Pull request link : https://github.com/cakmakmurat2000/RIOT/pull/1 It is my first GIT

Re: [riot-devel] LGPL compliance testing

2015-02-26 Thread Kaspar Schleiser
Hi, On 02/25/2015 09:46 PM, Murat CAKMAK wrote: So, What is the latest decision? No decision, yet. Stay tuned. ;) Should I withdraw my “pull request” for PsoC 5LP port? Definately not. I guess whatever the license discussion will lead to, it will be possible to use that port even for

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT/tests/vtimer_msg/main.c Failure after 1 hour 5 minutes an 32 seconds

2015-02-26 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi, maybe I am not gettting the problem right - but if you read the source: https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/tests/vtimer_msg/main.c lines 123 - 126 show while (1) { vtimer_sleep(sleep); msg_try_send(m, pid2); } that this is regular behavior :)

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT/tests/vtimer_msg/main.c Failure after 1 hour 5 minutes an 32 seconds

2015-02-26 Thread Jan Wagner
Ok. got it wrong - the SERIAL STOPS! is important. hm sorry - hm what happens if you modify sleep value? (lower fe.) how many output ? differnt behavoir? greets Jan ps sorry for the missunderstanding Jan Wagner m...@jwagner.eu hat am 26. Februar 2015 um 09:40 geschrieben: Hi,

Re: [riot-devel] Feedback from emworld and future plans (partnerships AND licensing)

2015-02-26 Thread Kaspar Schleiser
Hi, On 02/26/2015 12:35 PM, Jan Wagner wrote: Is the big picture clearer fo you? yes kind of. but can you please tell my what this fincancial engagement is used for? - who is defined as maintainer? RIOT is legally fully independent and will stay so. We're setting up a Verein in order

Re: [riot-devel] replace printf, puts issue

2015-02-26 Thread Jozef Maslik
Hi, Yes compiler do not optimize (remove out) empty function defined as is suggested. But if RIOT does not want use macros, we can define empty function as static inline function in header and then will be removed by optimization. log_api.h #if MODULE_LOG void log_info(...); #else static