Re: [riot-devel] Socket #0

Hi Sam, 2017-01-12 14:06 GMT+01:00 Sam Kumar : > Hi Martine, > I will work on testing it with sock and PR #6004, but it may take some > time since I might need to port the interface from conn to sock. > It seems to me that conn is deprecated and that sock is its replacement

Re: [riot-devel] Socket #0

Hi Martine, I will work on testing it with sock and PR #6004, but it may take some time since I might need to port the interface from conn to sock. It seems to me that conn is deprecated and that sock is its replacement moving forward. Am I correct? And what is the motivation for moving away from

Re: [riot-devel] Socket #0

Hi Sam, can you try with PR #6004 which ports POSIX sockets from conn to sock? There are still some kinks in this PR, but I plan to fix them until the release. On another note: the conn implementation of sockets was never tested with TCP (since there was no TCP implementation then), but feel free

Re: [riot-devel] CC1200 Sub-GHz Transceiver

Hi, @Baptiste: How did the CC1350 get into this round :-)? Is it similar to the other mentioned radios? In any way, I would be pretty happy to see support for that radio in RIOT. It would enhance the current SensorTag support significantly. @Anon: I have no idea about the differences between