Hi Dan, Gaetan,
I wonder, what problems are we trying to solve?
Maybe we can clearly enumerate them first so that we can check later,
whether an improved solution really solves these problems.
Cheers,
Thomas
On 24/11/2017 16:47, Daniel Petry wrote:
Hi Gaetan
I would like to introduce
On 11/24/2017 04:55 PM, Martine Lenders wrote:
Hi Daniel,
2017-11-24 16:47 GMT+01:00 Daniel Petry >:
[…]
1) Move build information concerning a particular module into that
module's Makefile
2) Make the module
Hi Daniel,
2017-11-24 16:47 GMT+01:00 Daniel Petry :
> […]
>
> 1) Move build information concerning a particular module into that
> module's Makefile
> 2) Make the module makefiles able to be written with purely declarative
> language
> 3) Retain backwards
Hi Gaetan
> I would like to introduce some packaging concepts around RIOT.
> To consider modules like well defined distribution packages and not only
> source files added to an application firmware.
From what you're saying, I understand that the aim is to make modules
completely
Hi Gaëtan,
I think most of us are happy about any more structural approach to the
build system, and me personally would prefer if we can stick to GNU
standard tools. So in my opinion: go ahead. Maybe - as discussed offline -
also start drafting some GitHub issues, outlining the drawbacks you
Hi *,
as some of you might have noticed, I proposed an initial version of a Code
of Conduct for the RIOT community [1]. I invite you to discuss this with
us, as this effects the whole community.
Kind Regards,
Martine Lenders
[1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/8116