Hello everyone,
As (I suppose) everybody here knows, the 'hwtimer' kernel feature has
been replaced by the 'xtimer' module.
Consequently, I'm wondering about some features that were specific to
RIOT OS, and how they have evolved. More precisely, I have questions to ask:
1] Is RIOT OS
t directly. Thanks a lot to both of you to pointing me to
that possible low-level solution.
Best regards, and see you,
Le 09/12/2015 13:50, Kaspar Schleiser a écrit :
Hey,
On 12/09/15 12:57, ROUSSEL Kévin wrote:
1] Is RIOT OS kernel still *tickless*?
Does it mean that there will be an inter
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to know if there was already a feature to determine a
mote's unique ID (when available) in RIOT.
Such a feature can be highly desirable when running a test on many
devices (I think about IoT-LAB testbed, for example), to automatically
assign/compute node
19, 2015 at 1:05 PM, ROUSSEL Kévin kevin.rous...@inria.fr
mailto:kevin.rous...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to know if there was already a feature to determine a
mote's unique ID (when available) in RIOT.
Such a feature can be highly desirable when running a test
Hello everyone,
I'm currently trying to test my developments on a pair of SAM R21
evaluation boards.
Surprisingly, I just cannot manage to receive any packet on these
devices... While the emitting and the receiving one are both sitting on
my desk!
Of course, I checked that both the boards
Hello Oleg,
Le 18/02/2015 23:16, Oleg Hahm a écrit :
Hi Kévin!
I began to use function pointers in the 'radio_driver.h' when trying to
create a unified model for radio drivers. I guess it went over later to the
whole netdev effort.
Yes, I remember that, but why can't this be implemented in
Hello,
I began to use function pointers in the 'radio_driver.h' when trying to
create a unified model for radio drivers. I guess it went over later to
the whole netdev effort.
My idea then was to have a fast, predictable call chain from the MAC
layer to the physical radio transceiver
Hello everyone,
Does the 'default' example work correctly on SAMR21 Xplained Pro? I
compiled and flashed successfully this application on the Xplained Pro I
have; but when doing 'make term', I just can't obtain any output from
the board (via the same debug USB port I used to flash).
Was
Hello everyone,
Since RIOT has been adapted to the AVR architecture, there is a chip
that--I think--would be a great platform for development and production:
the ATmega 256RFR2.
The RFR2 family is presented here:
http://www.atmel.com/devices/ATMEGA256RFR2.aspx
but to sum it up, this MCU
Hello everyone,
It's been a few months now since an AVR device (Arduino Mega) port has
been available in RIOT.
Does somebody use it regularly? I would like to try some developments on
AVR, and I was wondering if AVR support was production-ready, or if
there was still rough edges to aware
Hello everyone,
Maybe was it already envisioned, but another strategy would be dual
licensing, something akin to what FreeRTOS does for example.
Using this scheme:
* we got (L)GPL by default, for academic contributors and everyone that
has nothing against open-source;
* the same code can be
companies could as well
implement the missing bits themselves.
That being said I would also be excited to see some bigger company
contribute to RIOT. If switching to MIT is what it takes to achieve
this, I'm fine with it.
Cheers,
Ludwig
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:51:13AM +0100, ROUSSEL Kévin wrote
Hello,
I'm not absolutely against licence switch but... I actually feel uneasy
about about this kind of demands...
If I understand right, some corporations which have probably contributed
nothing to the project just barges in and said : if you want us to use
your work, you have to let us
13 matches
Mail list logo
