ntiki
( shameless plug: ported to M3 nodes of http://iot-lab.info )
cheers,
-- Cedric
- Original Message -
| From: "Emmanuel Baccelli"
| To: "RIOT OS kernel developers"
| Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 1:18:57 PM
| Subject: Re: [riot-devel] Contiki as a RIOT thre
Hey there,
+1 for the idea on my side too.
cheers
Emmanuel
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Kaspar Schleiser
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 01/19/2016 11:58 AM, Joakim Nohlgård wrote:
>
>> I would like to hear any ideas and opinions on this list on how to
>> effectively implement this.
>>
>
> I really li
Hey,
On 01/19/2016 11:58 AM, Joakim Nohlgård wrote:
I would like to hear any ideas and opinions on this list on how to
effectively implement this.
I really like the possiblity and always bragged that this way it is
possble, but running RIOT as thread within Contiki is not (in any way
that ma
Hi,
Just on the subject on uIP: I'm currently working on an emb6 port (in
parallel to the lwIP port), which is a proto-thread-less fork of uIP. But
as discussed in [1] and by the advantages you have given additionally, it
would definitely make sense to run Contiki in RIOT.
Cheers,
Martine
Am 19.01
Many legacy applications are built on Contiki, and many papers on IoT
are written around tests done on Contiki. Contiki also has a quite
large community who work with applications on the platform.
Because of this it would be useful to have a way of running Contiki
applications and projects under R