Hi Adam!
> What are the chances that there will be video of this talk available for
> those of us who aren't so fortunate to live in the vicinity of IoT-Lab?
Actually quiet high. We're planning to make a screencast of it. But I cannot
promise a timeframe when this might happen.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
What are the chances that there will be video of this talk available for
those of us who aren't so fortunate to live in the vicinity of IoT-Lab?
On Thu Nov 06 2014 at 11:36:53 AM Oleg Hahm wrote:
> Hey Thomas!
>
> > Happy to mention RIOT, I didn't know you were there :-)
>
> Yes, tomorrow I'll g
Hi Martine & Martin,
following a personal discussion, the approach of multiple FIB tables
(per IF / protocol) is off the table, now. There will and can be only
one FIB.
Important for the next steps are discussion and conclusion about a
viable (internal) data structure for the FIB ... it seem
Hey Thomas!
> Happy to mention RIOT, I didn't know you were there :-)
Yes, tomorrow I'll give a tutorial about RIOT on IoT-Lab. It was very nice
talk, by the way. Particular, taking the time of day into account. ;-)
Cheers,
Oleg
--
The best thing about declarative jokes is that you only have t
I'd love to attend IETF93 if for no other reason than I have yet to get
myself to Prague. Unfortunately, I don't think I'll be about to swing the
US$1200 in airfare plus accommodations. I really need to find myself some
wealthy benefactor interested in WSN research.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:27 AM
Oleg,
Excellent, glad to hear that you plan on participating.
Happy to mention RIOT, I didn't know you were there :-)
Thomas
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote:
> Hi Thomas!
>
> > Note that the 6TiSCH WG, in conjunction with ETSI, will organize a 6TiSCH
> > interop event during
Hi Thomas!
> Note that the 6TiSCH WG, in conjunction with ETSI, will organize a 6TiSCH
> interop event during IETF93 (July 2015, Prague) around 6TISCH technology,
> so including IEEE802.15.4e TSCH. You (and RIOT of course!) might be
> interested in participating. The plan is to come up with writin
Sorry to sound like a skipping record but what are the chances that there's
a copy of the meeting archived somewhere. I've been ill the past few days
and slept through the meeting.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Teemu Hakala wrote:
>
> On 5.11.2014, at 17:56, Hauke Petersen
> wrote:
> > as Ole
[was: Refectoring the network stack]
Adam, all,
I'm co-leading the OpenWSN project. CC'ing the OpenWSN ML.
In 2014, the IETF 6TiSCH working group (which is standardizing how to use
IEEE802.15.4e TSCH in combination with 6LoWPAN, RPL, CoAP) organized two
"plugfests":
- in London in March (
I expect to have some real hardware in hand (CC2538 based boards of my own
design, and possibly some MSP430 boards after that) in the coming weeks
(months if I don't get into gear). I'd be more than willing to contribute
some whatever time is needed to running tests on real hardware if it's
helpful
Am 06.11.2014 18:56 schrieb "Adam Hunt" :
>
> I'm sorry, somehow I missed the point where you mentioned 802.15.4e. Feel
free to ignore me. After last night I shouldn't be allowed to post in
public forums full of people smarter than I.
No need to be sorry. I'm guilty of this "falacy", too! xD
>
>
I'm sorry, somehow I missed the point where you mentioned 802.15.4e. Feel
free to ignore me. After last night I shouldn't be allowed to post in
public forums full of people smarter than I.
--adam
On Nov 6, 2014 9:46 AM, "Martine Lenders" wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Am 06.11.2014 18:38 schrieb "Adam Hu
Hi Adam,
Am 06.11.2014 18:38 schrieb "Adam Hunt" :
>
> Is support for TSCH in there somewhere? While I'm not entirely read up on
the spec it would seem to be fairly important these days.
>
> What is the current state of TSCH support in RIOT these days? I'm stuck
on my phone at the moment or I'd ta
Is support for TSCH in there somewhere? While I'm not entirely read up on
the spec it would seem to be fairly important these days.
What is the current state of TSCH support in RIOT these days? I'm stuck on
my phone at the moment or I'd take a look for myself (really, it probably
has a bit more to
On 5.11.2014, at 17:56, Hauke Petersen wrote:
> as Oleg promised below, we are going to try out Daviko's PlaceCam for todays
> meeting.
Hi all
So, how did the PlaceCam work? I'm interested in joining your meetings and
naturally the forthcoming meeting about testing is if great interest to me.
Hi again,
just saw that you mentioned the radio in the subject, never mind my
question about the radio...
Cheers,
Hauke
On 06.11.2014 10:24, Hauke Petersen wrote:
Hi Guillermo,
welcome to RIOT also from my side! Can you maybe provide some more
details on the specific LPCxpresso board you a
Hi Guillermo,
welcome to RIOT also from my side! Can you maybe provide some more
details on the specific LPCxpresso board you are targeting, especially
on the radio that is included?
For you porting efforts, best keep close to the structure of the ARM
Cortex-M based boards, as these are the
Hi,
On 11/05/14 18:15, Martine Lenders wrote:
* Transport layer
- port to netapi and pktbuf (Cenk?)
Maybe we should think on how to use messaging with large buffers and
adapt netapi accordingly? IMHO it would simplify a lot.
Kaspar
___
devel mail
Hi Martine!
> I'm currently in the testing stage of 6LoWPAN but it is mostly done, but I
> still need some kind of way to communicate with the transceiver module for
> older boards (alternative would be to remove it, but for this we need #1772
> and #1733 merged and all boards moved to the low-lev
19 matches
Mail list logo
