Hi,
Yes, we came to the same conclusion while driving to embedded world.
I've got the implementation and API specification ready as well and will open
a PR later.
Cheers, Ludwig
Am 27. Februar 2015 02:14:51 MEZ, schrieb Jozef Maslik :
>Hi,
>
>Yes compiler do not optimize (remove out) empty fun
Hi,
Yes compiler do not optimize (remove out) empty function defined as is
suggested.
But if RIOT does not want use macros, we can define empty function as static
inline function in header and then will be removed by optimization.
log_api.h
#if MODULE_LOG
void log_info(...);
#else
static inlin
Hi Murat,
You made the PR to your own repository. You have to open a Pull Request to
our repository.
Hope I could help,
Martine
2015-02-26 16:56 GMT+01:00 Murat CAKMAK :
> Hi Ludwig,
>
> Pull request link : https://github.com/cakmakmurat2000/RIOT/pull/1
> It is my first GIT experience. I might m
Hi Ludwig,
Pull request link : https://github.com/cakmakmurat2000/RIOT/pull/1
It is my first GIT experience. I might miss something :)
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@riot-os.org] On Behalf Of Ludwig Ortmann
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 8:32 AM
To: RIO
Hi,
On 02/26/2015 12:35 PM, Jan Wagner wrote:
Is the big picture clearer fo you?
>
yes kind of. but can you please tell my what this fincancial engagement is used
for? - who is defined as maintainer?
RIOT is legally fully independent and will stay so.
We're setting up a Verein in order t
> Is the big picture clearer fo you?
>
yes kind of. but can you please tell my what this fincancial engagement is used
for? - who is defined as maintainer?
(dont get me wrong I dont care about any fincial balances - I will never want a
single dime - my work for this project
is unpayable) - I
Hi,
On 02/25/2015 09:46 PM, Murat CAKMAK wrote:
So, What is the latest decision?
No decision, yet. Stay tuned. ;)
Should I withdraw my “pull request” for PsoC 5LP port?
Definately not. I guess whatever the license discussion will lead to, it
will be possible to use that port even for proprie
Hi Jan,
that's a lot of questions ;)
Long story short, the way I see it:
- RIOT was initially developed by manpower funded by FU Berlin, INRIA, HAW
- nowadays, most core maintainers are still affiliated to these
institutions (though there is a tendency towards more maintainers with
other affiliat
I am not certain if Karel joined the mailing list here yet.. you might
want to include him directly until we know more.
On 26.02.2015 09:48, Jan Wagner wrote:
Ok. got it wrong - the SERIAL STOPS! is important. hm sorry - hm what
happens if you modify
sleep
value? (lower fe.) how many output ?
Ok. got it wrong - the SERIAL STOPS! is important. hm sorry - hm what happens if
you modify
sleep
value? (lower fe.) how many output ? differnt behavoir?
greets Jan
ps sorry for the missunderstanding
> Jan Wagner hat am 26. Februar 2015 um 09:40 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> maybe I am not
Hi,
maybe I am not gettting the problem right - but if you read the source:
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/tests/vtimer_msg/main.c
lines 123 - 126 show
while (1) {
vtimer_sleep(sleep);
msg_try_send(&m, pid2);
}
that this is regular behavior :)
https://
Hi Karel,
I'm currently not offering (paid) private consulting for RIOT.
I'll forward your mail to to the public RIOT devel list and the further
discussion about your issue should happen there.
Alternatively you can ask for a consultant there, too.
Best
Christian
Am 26.02.2015 um 03:12 sch
12 matches
Mail list logo
