Hi Alex, hi all!
First of all, I have to apologize for possible spelling and formatting
mistakes. I'm not used to write mails on the phone but currently I don't have
my laptop.
> CA handling is also done by on transceiver side (no software mac
>implementation required) in TX_ARET mode (exce
Hi Daniel!
> I couldn't
>test it on a bigger testbed yet, let alone multi-hop, but I can not yet
>imagine that performance would suffer that much. Still have to read
>your
>article though.
I hope you are aware of the great and open IoT-LAB testbed where everyone can
conduct their experiments.
Hi Thomas!
>I have to admit when I once started it, the promises extended operating
>
>mode made
>were too auspicious to not use it, and I never came to run actual multi
>
>hop tests
>on it yet.
I did run various experiments on the testbed, both with multiple hops and
payloads of more than 1kB.
Hi All,
I'm studying masters program in Computer Science and have very recently
found out about RIOT-OS when I was looking for GSOC 2015 projects
in the area of Embedded Systems. For past few months I've been involved in
development of Embedded solution for Internet of Thing domain and have gained
Hi Thomas,
Taken from your description below, the main problem is that the
transceiver drops
any packets, right?
as soon as the the transceiver enters TX_ARET, it will not receive any
incoming packets (I guess this is due to having only one buffer
available for TX and RX, and the requiremen
Great job Daniel
Just to report that I've tested OCD with this patch on TI cc3200 with a to
be merged RIOT port [1] into mainstream and it works.
[1] https://github.com/attdona/RIOT
Cheers
Attilio
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Daniel Krebs wrote:
> Dear fellow RIOTing developers,
>
> O
