Re: [riot-devel] gnrc udp-hc support for elided checksum

2016-04-22 Thread René Herthel
Hello all, a little time has passed since I wrote the last mail about eliding checksums of UDP packets for the GNRC network stack. There are two general requirements: 1. We need to pass the information to elide the checksum of a packet through the stack. The netapi is not able to pass addi

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Release 2016.04

2016-04-22 Thread Thomas Eichinger
Congratulations to everybody for their awesome work! Best, Thomas > On Apr 22, 2016, at 4:33 PM, Hauke Petersen > wrote: > > Dear RIOT developers and users, > > we are happy to announce the seventh official release of the RIOT: > > --- * RIOT 2016.04 * > --

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-maintainer] RIOT Release 2016.04

2016-04-22 Thread Emmanuel Baccelli
Yay! On Apr 22, 2016 4:34 PM, "Hauke Petersen" wrote: > Dear RIOT developers and users, > > we are happy to announce the seventh official release of the RIOT: > > --- * RIOT 2016.04 * > --- > > This release adds support for two additional ne

[riot-devel] RIOT Release 2016.04

2016-04-22 Thread Hauke Petersen
Dear RIOT developers and users, we are happy to announce the seventh official release of the RIOT: --- * RIOT 2016.04 * --- This release adds support for two additional network stacks: lwIP and emb6. A bunch of additional protocols are n

Re: [riot-devel] PowerProfiler

2016-04-22 Thread Emmanuel Baccelli
Hi Michael, thanks! Keep us in the loop. Cheers Emmanuel On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Michael Andersen wrote: > I'm back on Monday, I'll set it up ASAP for you when I arrive. > On Apr 22, 2016 3:09 PM, "Emmanuel Baccelli" > wrote: > >> Hi Michael, >> thanks for the proposal. It seems there

Re: [riot-devel] PowerProfiler

2016-04-22 Thread Michael Andersen
I'm back on Monday, I'll set it up ASAP for you when I arrive. On Apr 22, 2016 3:09 PM, "Emmanuel Baccelli" wrote: > Hi Michael, > thanks for the proposal. It seems there is interest. When are you back > approximately? > I'm asking because some of us are working on a deadline (beginning of May) >

Re: [riot-devel] PowerProfiler

2016-04-22 Thread Emmanuel Baccelli
Hi Michael, thanks for the proposal. It seems there is interest. When are you back approximately? I'm asking because some of us are working on a deadline (beginning of May) for which energy measurements might be very welcome ;) cheers, Emmanuel On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Michael Andersen wr

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT+ULAs: no router entry

2016-04-22 Thread Alexander Aring
Hi, On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:31:04PM +0200, smlng wrote: > Hi all, > > I stripped down my 'radvd.conf' to a minimal of: > > ---snip--- > interface lowpan0 > { > AdvSendAdvert on; > MinRtrAdvInterval 3; > MaxRtrAdvInterval 10; > AdvDefaultPreference low; > > prefix fd4b:c59

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT+ULAs: no router entry

2016-04-22 Thread Alexander Aring
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:13:29PM +0200, smlng wrote: > Hi Alex, and all, > > my radvd.conf is the following: > > ---snip--- > > interface lowpan0 > { > AdvSendAdvert on; > UnicastOnly on; > AdvCurHopLimit 255; > AdvSourceLLAddress on; > > MinRtrAdvInterval 3; > MaxRtrA

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT+ULAs: no router entry

2016-04-22 Thread smlng
Hi all, I stripped down my 'radvd.conf' to a minimal of: ---snip--- interface lowpan0 { AdvSendAdvert on; MinRtrAdvInterval 3; MaxRtrAdvInterval 10; AdvDefaultPreference low; prefix fd4b:c597:5df5:0::/64 { AdvOnLink off; AdvAutonomous on; AdvRouter

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT+ULAs: no router entry

2016-04-22 Thread smlng
Hi Cenk, and all, I'm running my tests with latest master and 2016.04-branch, same behavior. Minus the fact, that the router entry in RIOT is created or missing in a somewhat 'non-deterministic' fashion. Best, Sebastian > Am 22.04.2016 um 12:33 schrieb Cenk Gündogan : > > Hey, > > That sou

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT+ULAs: no router entry

2016-04-22 Thread smlng
Hi Alex, and all, my radvd.conf is the following: ---snip--- interface lowpan0 { AdvSendAdvert on; UnicastOnly on; AdvCurHopLimit 255; AdvSourceLLAddress on; MinRtrAdvInterval 3; MaxRtrAdvInterval 10; AdvDefaultPreference low; prefix fd4b:c597:5df5:0::/64 {

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT+ULAs: no router entry

2016-04-22 Thread Thomas C. Schmidt
Hi, this may be. In any case, the erroneous behavior described by smlng should not depend on the use of ULAs. Proposal to smlng: Please use global unicast addresses and confirm the misbehavior. Strip off ULA from the discussion thereafter. Cheers, Thomas On 22.04.2016 12:33, Cenk Gündoga

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT+ULAs: no router entry

2016-04-22 Thread Cenk Gündogan
Hey, That sounds like the problem described in this issue [1]. The current master / release candidate version should include a "workaround" fix for that. Cheers, Cenk [1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/issues/5122 On 04/22/2016 12:19 PM, smlng wrote: Hi everyone, I'm testing COAP between RI

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT+ULAs: no router entry

2016-04-22 Thread Alexander Aring
Hi, On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:19:36PM +0200, smlng wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm testing COAP between RIOT on Phytec pba-d-01-kw2x and Linux on > RasPi+Openlabs using ULA IP addresses. > > On the Pi I run a 'radvd' to advertise a ULA prefix to RIOT, which works: > - RIOT sends RS after boot

[riot-devel] RIOT+ULAs: no router entry

2016-04-22 Thread smlng
Hi everyone, I'm testing COAP between RIOT on Phytec pba-d-01-kw2x and Linux on RasPi+Openlabs using ULA IP addresses. On the Pi I run a 'radvd' to advertise a ULA prefix to RIOT, which works: - RIOT sends RS after boot - the Pi answers with RA containing ULA prefix - RIOT configures ULA IP