Re: [riot-devel] Notification: Hack'n'ACK @ Tue Nov 29, 2016 5pm - 10pm (RIOT Events)

2016-11-29 Thread Martine Lenders
Hi, we are now set-up in Berlin for this month's Hack'n'ACK. If you like to join via PlaceCam [1] feel free to do so at *http://placecam.de/call.php?c=lmakKMrDG8a35aIBNqLBvOnApExkKFntj9xXawGNgTc- * RIOTers with access to

Re: [riot-devel] How do ISRs work in the context of RIOT's scheduler?

2016-11-29 Thread Oleg Hahm
Hi Kaspar! On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:59:14AM +0100, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > On 11/29/2016 11:14 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > > Okay, re-reading the documentation again, I agree that the behavior deviates > > from what is written. I also see, that the behavior is indeed different on > > different

Re: [riot-devel] How do ISRs work in the context of RIOT's scheduler?

2016-11-29 Thread Kaspar Schleiser
Hi, On 11/29/2016 11:14 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote: Okay, re-reading the documentation again, I agree that the behavior deviates from what is written. I also see, that the behavior is indeed different on different architectures which is clearly a bug. Turns out this is done similarily on all

Re: [riot-devel] How do ISRs work in the context of RIOT's scheduler?

2016-11-29 Thread Oleg Hahm
Hi Kaspar! On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:41:11AM +0100, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > On 11/29/2016 10:27 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > > I would call it rather a bug in the documentation. The behavior of the > > scheduler for threads of the same priority is simply underspecified. > > We had that discussion

Re: [riot-devel] How do ISRs work in the context of RIOT's scheduler?

2016-11-29 Thread Kaspar Schleiser
Hi, On 11/29/2016 10:27 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > I would call it rather a bug in the documentation. The behavior of the > scheduler for threads of the same priority is simply underspecified. We had that discussion offline. The "bug" is both in Cortex-M's ISR handling and in the docs. > "Assigning

Re: [riot-devel] How do ISRs work in the context of RIOT's scheduler?

2016-11-29 Thread Oleg Hahm
Hi Kaspar! On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:46:58AM +0100, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > On 11/26/2016 12:55 AM, Charles Cross wrote: > > Perhaps this is designed for the case where actions are taken inside the > > ISR which signal other threads (like sending IPC messages), but I'm > > still not clear on