Re: [riot-devel] questions about riot os

Hi, On 03/22/2017 12:13 AM, Arjun Hary wrote: > Is there a plan or a timeline for it? Nordic seems to have released its BLE stack for Mynewt under a compatible license. AFAIK someone is already looking into porting that to RIOT, but I don't know what's the state there. Help is very

Re: [riot-devel] questions about riot os

Is there a plan or a timeline for it? On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/21/2017 11:38 PM, Arjun Hary wrote: > > Thanks a lot. I have one more follow up question. Does RIOT have a full > > Bluetooth stack? > > Not yet. > > Kaspar >

Re: [riot-devel] questions about riot os

Thanks a lot. I have one more follow up question. Does RIOT have a full Bluetooth stack? On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hi Arjun, > > On 03/20/2017 05:03 PM, Arjun Hary wrote: > > 1) After adding the softdevice the code size jumped to 46K bytes

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT's CI system

Hi Martin! On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:21:22PM +0100, Landsmann, Martin wrote: > While going through the spreadsheet I stumbled upon row 28, i.e. 'Cope with > dynamic set of workers'. > > I would appreciate to get more information why the scoring seems to state, > what I interpret of it, > >

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT's CI system

Hi Oleg, first thx all for the effort collecting the requirements, pros and cons for the proposed CIs. While going through the spreadsheet I stumbled upon row 28, i.e. 'Cope with dynamic set of workers'. I would appreciate to get more information why the scoring seems to state, what I

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT's CI system

Hi Thomas! On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:17:07AM -0700, Thomas Eichinger wrote: > Reading the document provided it seems to me that Jenkins actually > got a better score than Murdock 2. (Please tell me if I am mistaken > and misinterpret the table.) No, you are correct. Jenkins got a slightly

Re: [riot-devel] Sending the udp packets does not work with the xbee module

Hi, 2017-03-21 11:09 GMT+01:00 Wiegel, Friedrich (IAI) : > […] I try to get my hands on the hardware, and try it out myself. > Is there a way to avoid the failed assertion when I increase the number of > interfaces to 2 but use one or is it only one interfaces

Re: [riot-devel] Sending the udp packets does not work with the xbee module

Ah ok. I did not know that the failed assertion behaves exactly like stack overflow. Then it must be the failed assertion. That behavior with the increase of the number of interfaces I find out as I tried to realize a border router. I really can not understand why sending, the UDP packets with

Re: [riot-devel] Sending the udp packets does not work with the xbee module

Hi Friedrich, then it is indeed weird, that you have to increase the number of static interfaces. Same goes for the stack overflow. Usually the stack should be big enough. Are you sure it is a stack overflow and not just a failed assertion? They look very similar in RIOT, since both let the node