Re: [riot-devel] broken archives?
> Mostly because I don't think that paying money makes anything more secure. I would argue it makes it marginally more secure - you probably aren't getting MITM'd by a script kiddie at the coffee shop, which immediately my first thought every time I see the red warning in Chrome. Does the project have a paypal address for donations? I can send you $10 if that's what the money would go towards. Best, Craig Younkins On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Hi! > > Am Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:49:27AM -0400 schrieb Craig Younkins: > > > Better now? > > > > No. The new cacert.org - signed cert is not in the root trust store of > most > > browsers - http://wiki.cacert.org/InclusionStatus > > I think you'll need to purchase one unfortunately. > > Sorry, I'm not gonna pay for that. (Mostly because I don't think that > paying > money makes anything more secure.) Either we'll find a sponsor (maybe HAW > is > helping again?) or people with unsupported browser/OS combination has to > install the root certificate themselves: > https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3 > > Cheers, > Oleg > -- > RAID joke are always redundant > > ___ > devel mailing list > devel@riot-os.org > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [riot-devel] broken archives?
> Better now? No. The new cacert.org - signed cert is not in the root trust store of most browsers - http://wiki.cacert.org/InclusionStatus I think you'll need to purchase one unfortunately. Craig Younkins On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Hi! > > > Can we fix the SSL certificate? > > Better now? > > Cheers, > Oleg > -- > The problem with TCPIP jokes is that when I tell them, all I want is an > ACK but > usually get FINs and RSTs > > ___ > devel mailing list > devel@riot-os.org > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [riot-devel] broken archives?
Can we fix the SSL certificate? On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Hi! > > > I am also seeing this for http://riot-os.org/pipermail/devel/. The > > root site (http://riot-os.org) still works. > > The first link is indeed not supposed to work. > > > I think the URL is configured wrong in mailman. > > https://lists.riot-os.org/pipermail/devel/ works for me. > > Yes, you're right. I recently run a mailman script to fix the links from > http > to https, but apparently failed twice. First, I forgot to specify the host > name at all (which Olaf Bergmann pointed me to) and then I used the wrong > domain. > > Should be fixed now. Thanks for the hints. > > Cheers, > Oleg > -- > I’d tell you an UDP joke but you might not get it. Also, I have a TCP > joke. > I’ll keep telling it until you get it. > > ___ > devel mailing list > devel@riot-os.org > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [riot-devel] NFC & Atmel AT86RF232B
I think the at86rf231 driver works with the 212B or will otherwise require minimal changes. I have not tested it but anticipate using it. In the linux kernel they are both supported in the same file. Craig Younkins On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Joël Chotard wrote: > Hi all, > > Does somebody is working on a RIOT NFC device driver ? and the ATMEL sub-G > AT86RF212B driver ? > > Joël > ___ > devel mailing list > devel@riot-os.org > http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [riot-devel] Benchmarks
Hi Simon, Throughput will be highly dependent upon the RF environment and what transceiver you are using. The M0+ most likely has enough power to do it under ideal conditions, but retransmissions due to collisions will limit the effective bandwidth. You can use 900 mhz and 2.4 ghz transceivers with 15.4. ~900 is significantly less crowded but lower theoretical bandwidth. The Atmel 212B is 900 Mhz and specs 1000 kbps as the max air data rate. Which transceiver are you using? Craig Younkins On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Simon Vincent wrote: > Has anyone done any performance tests to see what throughput can be > achieved using RIOT? > > I would be interested to know if the Cortex M0+ is powerful enough to > sustain 250Kb/s TCP over 6lowpan/802.15.4. > > Does RIOT have any mechanism to measure CPU usage? > > - Simon > ___ > devel mailing list > devel@riot-os.org > http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[riot-devel] Looking for RIOT consultants/contractors
Hello RIOTers, I work for a small business that does remote temperature monitoring for food safety (https://freshtemp.com) and we're strongly considering RIOT for the next version of our system. I wrote a small microkernel that is used in some of our other products and so am familiar with OS and embedded programming on Atmel AVRs, but I am not familiar with RIOT. We're looking for a contractor or consultant that can answer my many questions about RIOT and assist us in getting up to TCP/UDP-level communication with the stack described below. We are looking for someone fairly familiar with RIOT already, and we expect to use 15 hours to 50 hours of this person's time. The time will depend on what amount of RIOT modifications are necessary for our platform, and what problems we run into. Our stack: - Sensors * Undecided MCU but probably ARM Cortex M0 or M0+ * ATZB-RF-212B-0-CN RF module operating on 900 MHz using the AT86RF212B transceiver * Requires high-ish accuracy timekeeping with external crystal * Requires access to ADC for temperature measurement * Battery powered and thus power sensitive - need to be able to use low power states of MCU - Gateway * Linux SOM (probably Variscite) with Cortex A9 * ATZB-RF-212B-0-CN RF module operating on 900 MHz using the AT86RF212B transceiver - Wireless * Star topology * 6lowpan on 802.15.4 on 900 MHz, chosen because of compatibility with linux. If another layer on top of 15.4 would result in better power numbers, that would be valuable info to have * Hopefully able to utilize 15.4's Guaranteed Time Slices (GTS) to reduce power consumption Experience with the linux side of this communication system would be very nice, but not necessary. So are you interested in getting paid to work on RIOT? Send me an email at craig [at] freshtemp.com off list and provide some credentials and why we should work with you. Thank you! Craig Younkins FreshTemp.com CTO ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
