Re: [riot-devel] Release 2020.10

Congrats to all involved! Thanks Koen for managing this release! Cheers, --Emmanuel On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:04 AM José Ignacio Alamos < jose.ala...@haw-hamburg.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Very nice! Congratulations to everyone! Thanks Koen! > > Cheers, > José > > > On 20/11/01 06:18PM, Leandro

[riot-devel] [RIOT Summit '20] Videos available

Dear all, the RIOT Summit '20 took place last week, online. For those who missed it, you can now check out videos of talks and break-out sessions at: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDXXQJiSjPKHpZpiPee7OYaJpUmmfV6Nh Cheers, --Emmanuel ___

[riot-devel] RIOT Summit 2020 -- Sept. 14-15 -- An Online Event

Dear RIOTers, The fifth RIOT Summit will take place on September 14-15, 2020. The event is online. Two days feature single-track presentations, breakout sessions, and a hands-on coding tutorial. If you want to attend, please register as soon as possible via

Re: [riot-devel] Release 2020.07

Yay! Congrats to all involved and special thanks to Martine for managing this release! ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[riot-devel] RIOT Summit 2020: second call for contributions

2nd CALL FOR CONTRIBUTIONS RIOT Summit 2020 September 14-15, 2020 Participation options: online & on-site (f2f meeting to be confirmed, at Station F, Paris, France) https://summit.riot-os.org

Re: [riot-devel] Release 2020.04

Congrats to all involved!!! And special thanks to Leandro for managing this release! Cheers On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 1:44 PM Cenk Gündoğan wrote: > My applause to the community, and my respect to Leandro for this smooth > release (: Thanks! > > Cheers, > Cenk > > On Thu, Apr 30 2020 at 13:25

[riot-devel] RIOT Summit 2020: Call for Contributions

CALL FOR CONTRIBUTIONS RIOT Summit 2020 September 14-15, 2020 Participation options: online & on-site (f2f meeting to be confirmed, at Station F, Paris, France) https://summit.riot-os.org

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT sprint day

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hey Martine, > > On 3/19/20 11:39 AM, Martine Sophie Lenders wrote: > > So you judge this as a hen and egg then? There is no interest, since not > > many people know about it, so there is no advertisement for it since not > > enough

Re: [riot-devel] Release 2020.01

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:15 PM Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > > On 2/3/20 10:02 PM, Francois-Xavier Molina wrote: > > We are happy to announce the 22nd official release of RIOT: > > Congrats everyone! > > Awesome job managing the release, Francisco! > +1 cheers! --Emmanuel

Re: [riot-devel] Release 2019.10

Yay! Congrats to all involved, and thanks a bunch Ken for managing this release! Cheers Emmanuel On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:17 PM Ken Bannister wrote: > Dear RIOTers, > > We are happy to announce the 21st official release of RIOT: > > --- * RIOT 2019.10 *

Re: [riot-devel] Leaving the project

Hi Gaetan thanks for your intense commitment so far, and all the best for your next adventures! Cheers Emmanuel On Fri, Oct 18, 2019, 12:27 Gaëtan Harter wrote: > Hi RIOT developers, > > I will am leaving my job today so will most likely disappear from the > RIOT project. I was hoping to

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-users] Release 2019.07

Belated yay! Congrats to all involved and thanks Kevin for managing this release! Cheers Emmanuel On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 9:48 AM Gaëtan Harter wrote: > Hi, > > Congratulations! > > Gaëtan > > On 7/25/19 12:37 PM, Martine Lenders wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Congretulations! > > > > Cheers, > >

Re: [riot-devel] Incorporating OMG Data-Distribution Service for Real-Time Systems (DDS)

Hi Brenton I do not know of such effort currently taking place. There was some work in this direction in the past, but it was discontinued, as fas as I know. Best, Emmanuel On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, 14:15 Brenton Chetty wrote: > Hi Guys > > Is anyone currently working on incorporating DDS into

[riot-devel] Embench: benchmark for class 1 IoT devices / MCUs

Hi there, I just stumbled over this, which I thought some of you might find of interest: Some people (from the RISC-V crowd, apparently) have started to set up a de facto standard benchmark for Class 1 IoT devices / microcontrollers. They explicitly target devices with typically Flash ≤64 KiB

Re: [riot-devel] CC2538dk Riotboot support

FYI I opened a PR adding a WIP porting guide: https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/11597 On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 2:43 PM Gaëtan Harter wrote: > On 5/27/19 2:36 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > Seems to me that a quick riotboot porting guide could be useful somewhere > &

Re: [riot-devel] Notification: Hack'n'ACK @ Tue May 28, 2019 5pm - 10pm (CEST) (RIOT Events)

Some of us are already on Jitsi at https://meet.jit.si/riot-hacknack Cheers! Emmanuel On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 5:11 PM Martine Lenders wrote: > Hi, > > this is a reminder or maybe new information for some: The Hack'n'ACK this > month will start in Berlin (and Paris?) tomorrow already at 3pm. If

Re: [riot-devel] CC2538dk Riotboot support

Seems to me that a quick riotboot porting guide could be useful somewhere in the wiki. On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 2:30 PM Gaëtan Harter wrote: > Hi Brenton, > > if you only use the default `riotboot/flash` or `flash` in > `tests/riotboot` targets, you do not need flasher changes. > But you should

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-maintainer] Release 2019.04

Nice! Congrats to all involved! And thanks Dan for managing this one! Cheers Emmanuel On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:31 AM Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hey everyone, > > On 4/29/19 4:01 PM, Daniel Petry wrote: > > we are happy to announce the 19th official release of RIOT: > > congratulations and big

Re: [riot-devel] Checkpoining and Prague

Hi Gero On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 8:49 AM Gero Müller wrote: > > For now we use the MSP430FR5969 platform (see > https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/11012) but we plan to include / > switch to RISC-V in future. Maybe a port of our checkpointing to RISC-V > would be a valid topic for the

Re: [riot-devel] Coordination for oxidize conference (Berlin, ~2019-04-27)

Hi Christian, thanks for the heads up! Looks interesting. We could indeed organize such that some RIOTers (whom exactly is t.b.d) would attend to give a talk and answer Q Best, Emmanuel On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:35 AM chrysn wrote: > Hi, > > there will be a conference event embedded systems

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-users] RIOT-os meet-up at FOSDEM

Hi Koen, I won't be at FOSDEM, but based on recent email exchanges, it seems Daniele will be around. (and maybe you could have happy discussions about bootloaders, SUIT etc. ;) Cheers Emmanuel On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:30 PM Koen wrote: > Hi all, > > As I will be visiting FOSDEM again this

Re: [riot-devel] wolfSSL package and secure-boot demo

Hi Daniele, thanks a lot for sharing! Looks very interesting. A propos: I suppose you also have seen this other recent bootloader riotboot [1] fly by? >From what I understand, the applicability and approach are similar, except the HAL itself is provided by a minimal version of RIOT. We used

Re: [riot-devel] PhyNode connecting to Raspberry Pi

Hi Anna, if I am not mistaken, your PhyNode is communicating via a IEEE 802.15.4 radio transceiver. So for your raspberryPi to be able to communicate with it, you need to add a IEEE 802.15.4 transceiver to your Pi as described in [1], for instance with an Openlab module [2]. Emmanuel [1]

Re: [riot-devel] Embedded World 2019

Hi Federico, last year we had a RIOT booth at FOSDEM, but this year we do not. However, maybe some RIOTers attend and could meet nevertheless? (Personally I can't attend this year, unfortunately). Cheers, Emmanuel On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 6:34 AM Federico Pellegrin wrote: > Hi, > Very nice,

[riot-devel] Feature freeze for Release 2019.01

Dear RIOTers, the feature freeze (for major impact new features) will be effective at midnight. As a gentle reminder: the final feature freeze (for other PRs) is January 18th. Wishing you a happy code/polish/review/merge sprint, Cheers, Alex & Emmanuel >

Re: [riot-devel] Cortex M33 support

A crucial feature about this new arch is the availability of secure vs non-secure execution environment within the same chip. => we need to design how to leverage these 2 environments (simultaneously) with RIOT. On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 4:43 PM Juan Ignacio Carrano wrote: > > > On 10/17/18 4:19

Re: [riot-devel] Binding in Javascript

Hi Manar, FYI, complementing this PR, some additional work was done providing more bindings e.g. CoAP bindings as reported in this paper: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01766610/document If you look at the code in this branch [1] you should be able to find code that does just that. Best, Emmanuel

Re: [riot-devel] Driver design rules in RIOT

Hi there, based on this exchange, is there matter for a wiki page on this? (Or for alternative documentation, e.g. reviving the concept of RDM [1] ?) Best Emmanuel [1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/6191 On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:38 AM Gunar Schorcht wrote: > Hi Hauke, > > many

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-maintainer] CI news

Nice! Thanks Martine! Was last night's build supposed to show up too, at this point? Cheers Emmanuel On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:04 PM Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hey everyone, > > thanks to Martine we now have a nice new view for our nightly builds: > > https://ci.riot-os.org/nightlies.html > >

Re: [riot-devel] Proposal for sys folder

Hi José, thanks for tackling this! On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:16 AM Jose wrote: > >1. Move the `net` folder to the RIOTBASE folder (`sys/net` -> `sys`): > > I suppose you mean '/sys/net' ->'/net' This idea has been floating around for a while, and I think there was consensus at some point

Re: [riot-devel] Release 2018.07

Yeah! Congrats to all involved, and thanks Gaëtan for managing this release! Cheers Emmanuel On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:11 AM Gaëtan Harter wrote: > Dear RIOTers, > > we are happy to announce the 16th official release of RIOT: > > --- * RIOT 2018.07 * ---

Re: [riot-devel] Save the date: RIOT Summit 2018

Hi Carsten, yes, hotels seem to be mostly filled up, unfortunately. Nevertheless, that are still some things left: I was able to book something OK-ish on booking.com today. Else, it seems some things still pop up on airbnb, for those who use that. Emmanuel On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:51 PM

Re: [riot-devel] Low power options for STM32 (L432) boards

Hi Patrick, welcome to RIOT! I'm not the best specialist of the topic, maybe others will have complementary advice (or may correct me). Can you scan through the wikipage on this topic [1] ? For the L4, pm is not there yet. What you could do is look at [2] an consider extending for L4. Then if

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-users] Release 2018.04

Yeehah! Thanks to everyone involved and to Kaspar for managing this release! Cheers Emmanuel On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Dear RIOTers, > > we are happy to announce the 15th official release of RIOT: > > --- * RIOT 2018.0 *

Re: [riot-devel] Porting RIOT to ESP8266

Hi Gunar, On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Gunar Schorcht wrote: > That's true, it uses its own toolchain. But, at least some parts of the > source code, e.g., thread and interrupt handling, could be reused. > Handling of peripherals like GPIO, UART, SPI, I2C, timers

Re: [riot-devel] Notification: Monthly RIOT developer meeting @ Mon Feb 26, 2018 5pm - 6pm (CET) (RIOT Events)

Hi Paco, so the meeting is at 4PM (now) right? What is the exact zoom.us meeting point? Best, Emmanuel On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Martine Lenders wrote: > Hi, > > when are we finally moving up the meeting to 16:00 CET? I'll need to leave > again at 17:30. > >

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-maintainer] Release 2018.01

Indeed, thanks to Sebastian for managing this release, and congrats to all involved parties! On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:18 AM, Emmanuel Baccelli < emmanuel.bacce...@gmail.com> wrote: > Indeed, thanks to Sebastian for managing this release, and congrats to all > involved parties! &

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-maintainer] Release 2018.01

Indeed, thanks to Sebastian for managing this release, and congrats to all involved parties! On Jan 31, 2018 23:55, "Cenk Gündoğan" wrote: > congratulations to everyone involved! > > ... and kudos to Sebastian for managing this release so elegantly (: > > Cheers, > Cenk

Re: [riot-devel] Whether RIOT can achieve wireless ICN communication

Hi there, RIOT supports CCN-lite and NDN stacks, which are both offering ICN capabilities over low-power wireless networks as demonstrated in [1][2][3] among others. For preliminary instructions/tutorial on how to use these stacks see [4] [5]. The boards supported by RIOT are listed there [6].

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-users] Release 2017.10

Yay!! Congrats to all involved parties and thanks Hauke for managing this release. Cheers! Emmanuel On Oct 27, 2017 12:38 PM, "Hauke Petersen" wrote: > Dear RIOTers, > > we are happy to announce the 13th official release of RIOT: > > --- * RIOT

Re: [riot-devel] Ahoi SANE

Hi Thomas, thanks for letting us know! Is there any pointer/URL or preliminary documentation that is available already concerning this project? Cheers, Emmanuel On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Thomas C. Schmidt wrote: > Dear RIOTers, > > this is to announce SANE,

Re: [riot-devel] Commercial products based of RIOT

Hi Samir, for this, I suggest you take a look at the companies that have given a talk at the last RIOT Summit. See: http://summit.riot-os.org/2017/#speakers and http://summit.riot-os.org/2017/blog/2017/10/06/slides/ Some examples of products and deployments using RIOT that I have seen recently

[riot-devel] RIOT Summit 2017: slides & recap

Dear RIOTers, The RIOT Summit 2017 was a success, with talks, break-sessions and lively interactions for 2 days, with over 100 participants from Europe, North- and South-America, as well as Asia. The slides for the presentations of day 1 of the Summit are now available online at

Re: [riot-devel] Help testing Kinetis dev boards

Hi Joakim, FYI I just got hold of some kw41z boards. gnrc_networking compiles on both OS X and Ubuntu (Vagrant). Now I am trying to debug some trouble with jlink (can't flash the board yet). Cheers Emmanuel On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli < emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr>

Re: [riot-devel] Help testing Kinetis dev boards

Hi Joakim just the other day, we ordered a couple frdm-kw41z at Inria, so we should be able to test here soon. Cheers, Emmanuel On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Joakim Nohlgård wrote: > Dear developers, > Eistec have begun adding support for more Kinetis Freedom

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-maintainer] Release 2017.04

Yay! Thanks Kaspar for being the Release Manager this time around! Best, Emmanuel On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Dear RIOTers, > > we are happy to announce the 11th official release of RIOT: > > --- * RIOT 2017.04 *

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Research Seminar: a short report

SCH implementation > in RIOT. Are there any more details available on this project? > > Thanks, > Ken > > http://riot-os.org/files/RIOT-Seminar-2017/RIOT-Spring- > Seminar-Watteyne.pdf > > On 04/28/2017 06:26 AM, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > Hi everyone, > >

[riot-devel] RIOT Research Seminar: a short report

Hi everyone, there was a seminar organized earlier this month in Paris. The goal of that seminar was to gather various research teams working (or considering to work) around RIOT at Inria. The agenda + slides are available at http://riot-os.org/seminar-2017.html Some synopsis/highlights below:

[riot-devel] IoT Software Update IETF mailing list

Hi everyone, those concerned with software updates in RIOT should probably consider registering to this new mailing list to follow and/or participate in related discussions: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fud Cheers, Emmanuel ___ devel mailing

Re: [riot-devel] waspmote + xbee + shell

Hi François, you could first try the below, assuming you have some other board with 802.15.4 lying around (e.g. a SAMR21): - use gnrc_minimal on your waspmote - compile/flash/term the gnrc_networking example on the other board - ping6 on the board running the gnrc_networking example to check that

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Summit?

Hi Ken, yes there is. It is planned in September, in Berlin. The dates are not 100% set in stone, but very probably it will be Sept. 29th and 30th, in conjunction with ACM ICN conference [1]. We will announce it soon. Would you be able to come by? Would be great. Cheers, Emmanuel [1]

Re: [riot-devel] about RIOT-os porting

Hi Chen, RIOT targets primarily low-end IoT devices, e.g. see devices defined in RFC 7228 [1]. At first sight, it seems to me your hardware is rather high-end in comparison: what are the RAM/ROM specs? What architecture? If it can run Linux, why don't you want to use Linux? This does not mean

Re: [riot-devel] [RFC 6719] MRHOF - Objective Function for RPL

Hi Rafał On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Rafał Rzatkiewicz < rafal.rzatkiew...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/issues/2493 > > Of course this checklist is related to the previous implementation of RIOT > OS and long before the gnrc network stack which is included in

Re: [riot-devel] wolfSSL port to RIOT OS

rts. The only real change required on Mac > OS X was to include instead of when > building with RIOT_OS. > > > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > Kaleb Himes > > Software Engineer > > www.wolfssl.com > > > >> On Dec 8, 2016, at 09:13, Emman

Re: [riot-devel] SiLabs Gecko

Hi Akshay It seems that SiLabs uses the terms of a zlib license [1] for its code (see [2]). If this is correct indeed, zlib is recognized by FSF and compatible with LGPL, so no issues there, I guess. Cheers Emmanuel [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zlib_License [2]

Re: [riot-devel] wolfSSL port to RIOT OS

+1 here! This would be a great addition to RIOT. Cheers, Emmanuel On Dec 1, 2016 12:38 AM, "Matthias Waehlisch" wrote: > Hi Kaleb, > > > +1 -- in particular, if you plan to continue the maintenance of the > port! > > > > Cheers > matthias > > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016,

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Release 2016.10

Yay! Thanks a bunch Martine for taking on the role of manager for this release. Congrats to everyone for all the work! Emmanuel On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hey, > > congratulations to everyone and thanks for all the hard work! > > On

Re: [riot-devel] IoTivity pkg for RIOT

Hi Mattia, I would say: make the PR and we will feedback then. Two comments at first sight, though: - to remain clean, Apache licensed files should not be PRed directly to be located in the RIOT/example/ Instead, can't you pull them (+ whatever you need) along with your pkg? - the files you

Re: [riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

Hello again Cr0s, Great. I was asking this because some RIOTers in Chile are about to start to port LoRaWAN to RIOT, hence your SX1276 driver would be great for them, I guess. Looking forward to your PR! One last question: are you using your SX1276 on a STM32L1 of some sort? Cheers Emmanuel

Re: [riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

Hi there, Any news on this? Is there a branch available somewhere? Best, Emmanuel On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Anon Anonymous wrote: > Hi, RIOTers! > > After a couple of months I've finished a Semtech's SX1276 LoRa transceiver > driver (physical level, RX and TX)

Re: [riot-devel] Hacktoberfest

OK, I just created the label. So feel free to use it this month! We'll delete the label after our next release. Cheers, Emmanuel On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Kaspar Schleiser <kas...@schleiser.de> wrote: > Hey, > > On 10/07/2016 02:50 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > A

[riot-devel] Next from Arduino

Hi everyone, I just stumbled across this. Seems Arduino is going for easier hardware modularity and cloudification. https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/29/arduino-unleashes-a-serious-internet-of-things-system-for-hardware-hackers/ Emmanuel ___ devel

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Core Development Project

Hi Srivignessh, improving x86 support in RIOT is a not such a bad idea, in my opinion. If you are interested in this however, instead of the Galileo board, I would suggest working on support for Arduino 101 [1]. The first step would be to provide initial support i.e. to have the bare minimum for

Re: [riot-devel] C.H.I.P

Hi Arash, at first sight Linux can run on C.H.I.P. So why not use Linux? RIOT targets devices which cannot run Linux (or derivatives/equivalents). Hence: there are no plans to support CHIP best, Emmanuel On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Arash Shafiei wrote: > Hi, I was

Re: [riot-devel] Skimpy make-do streaming of RIoT summit plenary

Jul 15, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Oleg Hahm <oliver.h...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 09:35:06AM +0200, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: >> > Thanks Carsten! >> > >> > On Jul 15, 2016 9:30 AM, "Carsten Bormann&q

Re: [riot-devel] Skimpy make-do streaming of RIoT summit plenary

Thanks Carsten! On Jul 15, 2016 9:30 AM, "Carsten Bormann" wrote: > > https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/bomthsflordmhfhplund2imm64e > > You cannot see the slides there; copies of the slides are slowly > gathering at http://www.tzi.de/~cabo/riot-summit/ > > If you join the

Re: [riot-devel] Web and IoT discussion

Hi again, for the CoAP session on Saturday, there may be a remote participation organized based on Google Hangouts or some other WebRTC scheme. Stay tuned... Carsten will make the announcement will be on #riot-os Cheers Emmanuel On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli < emmanuel.ba

Re: [riot-devel] Web and IoT discussion

Hi Carsten, Great. Thanks, Emmanuel On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote: > Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > The CoAP discussion is going to be a break-out session on Saturday, with > > a relatively small number of participants, so remot

Re: [riot-devel] Web and IoT discussion

Hi Joakim, unfortunately, there is no such plan concerning the whole event... The CoAP discussion is going to be a break-out session on Saturday, with a relatively small number of participants, so remote participation would be easier to organize. Best, Emmanuel On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:08

Re: [riot-devel] Web and IoT discussion

Hi Ken Let me enquire. It would be great if you could participate indeed. Cheers Emmanuel On Jul 14, 2016 7:12 PM, "Ken Bannister" wrote: > I read that Ari Keränen and Carsten Bormann plan to lead a discussion on > Saturday at the RIOT Summit on the Web and IoT, including

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT, Windows, and Code Composer Studio

Caeveat: coma at the end url may mess up your automatic URL detection thingie: https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/Using-the-Eclipse-IDE-for-C-and-CPP-Developers,- Howto On Jun 20, 2016 4:49 PM, "Emmanuel Baccelli" <emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr> wrote: > Hi there > >

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT, Windows, and Code Composer Studio

Hi there I don't know how complete and up to date that is but there is also: https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/Using-the-Eclipse-IDE-for-C-and-CPP-Developers,- Howto Cheers Emmanuel On Jun 20, 2016 4:39 PM, "Francisco Javier Acosta Padilla" < francisco.aco...@inria.fr> wrote: > Hi Clark! > >

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread

in good condition and send it as a pull request. > > > 2016-06-07 12:58 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli <emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr > >: > > > > > Hi Gustavo, Hi Ivan, > > > ok I see. thanks for your answers. > > > That's too bad. It would have been gr

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread

2016-05-31 17:30 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com > >: > > > > > > > Hello Baptiste, Emmanuel > > > > > > > > I'll let the people more familiar (in cc) with it reply. > > > > > > > > On terça-feira, 31 de maio

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread

2016-05-30 21:07 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli <emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr>: > >> Hi Baptiste, >> >> Thanks for the clarification. >> >> Have you already been in contact personally with Thiago? >> >> It may be interesting if they attend and/or pr

Re: [riot-devel] Unifying the interfaces of the digest functions

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Hi Matthias! > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:12:42PM +0200, Mathias Tausig wrote: > > The interafces used by the cryptographic digest functions sha256, sha1 > and md5 > > (xx_init, xx_update, xx_final) are very

Re: [riot-devel] PowerProfiler

<mich...@steelcode.com> wrote: > I would be more than happy to start it up again and maintain it if it > would be of use to the community. I'll do so as soon as I finish my > post-IPSN Vienna tour :) > On Apr 21, 2016 3:46 PM, "Emmanuel Baccelli" <emmanuel.bacce..

Re: [riot-devel] IoT technology survey

at 2:43 PM, Michael Frey <f...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Am Di, 15.03.2016, 11:15, schrieb Emmanuel Baccelli: > > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/AGILEIoT > > so, here are (if I see this correctly) are the results > > > https://ianskerrett.wor

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-users] Certificates on RIOT pages

Thanks Oleg! Now we're super legit ;) On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Dear requesting IOTlers, > > good things come to those who wait: we finally got our letsencrypt [1] > sponsored certificates for the self-hosted RIOT related pages. > For

[riot-devel] IoT technology survey

Hi everyone, our friends from Eclipse Foundation are conducting a survey about IoT technologies currently in use or aimed at in various contexts. Maybe you can consider filling it in (and maybe the results will be of some interest). https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/AGILEIoT Best, Emmanuel

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT: Production ready?

Hi Baptiste, I think you need to specify for what type of use/product. Else it's difficult to judge... I mean: if RIOT is supposed to "make coffee and donuts out of the box", it's maybe not production ready. For some other types of use, it may be production-ready. Cheers, Emmanuel On Wed, Mar

Re: [riot-devel] GSOC inquiry.

Hi Om RIOT is not participating in GSOC this year. Best, Emmanuel On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Om Shivom Nagpal wrote: > Hi, I am Om Shivom pursuing CSE from PEC University of Technology, > Chandigarh and I have previously worked on C++ and Python. I am interested >

Re: [riot-devel] Port to STM32F7

this branch might give > you a head start? Feel free to copy what you need! > > Cheers, > Hauke > > [1] https://github.com/haukepetersen/RIOT/tree/add_board_stm32f7discovery > > On 03.03.2016 18:31, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > Hi Antoine, > > As far as I know, no

Re: [riot-devel] Port to STM32F7

Hi Antoine, As far as I know, no one has started porting to this board, or to any other Cortex M7-based board yet. However, it would be great to have support for this Discovery board (and initial M7 support). Are you interested/willing to start porting? The community usually turns out to be

Re: [riot-devel] Sample applications

Hi there, I think it would be great to have a RIOT tutorial space somewhere. Two comments: - Cenk also had some input on that at https://github.com/cgundogan/RIOT-Tutorial - maybe some stuff from Alex (e.g. his upcoming Bluetooth+802.15.4 border router) could belong into applications or even

Re: [riot-devel] Happy 10k!

Fantastic! Let's keep rocking! On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Ludwig Knüpfer < ludwig.knuep...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Hoorah! > > BTW: > what's the current SLoC count? > > Cheers, > Ludwig > > Am 22. Februar 2016 00:56:13 MEZ, schrieb Kaspar Schleiser < > kas...@schleiser.de>: > >Hey fellow

Re: [riot-devel] Newcomer to the community

Hi Satyaki, thanks for your interest. Please have a look at https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/GSOC16 Thanks, Emmanuel On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Satyaki Upadhyay wrote: > Hi > > > My name is Satyaki and I'm a newcomer to the RIOT community. I want to > contribute

Re: [riot-devel] Contribution to RIOT OS as GSOC 2016 student

Hi there, thanks for your interest! Please have a look at https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/GSOC16 Thanks, Emmanuel On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Aditya Manglik wrote: > Hello developers > I would like to contribute to RIOT OS as a Google Summer of Code >

Re: [riot-devel] Contiki as a RIOT thread

Hey there, +1 for the idea on my side too. cheers Emmanuel On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hey, > > On 01/19/2016 11:58 AM, Joakim Nohlgård wrote: > >> I would like to hear any ideas and opinions on this list on how to >> effectively implement

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Release 2015.12

Yay! On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Cenk Gündogan wrote: > Dear RIOT developers and users, > > I am glad to announce the sixth official release of the RIOT operating > system: > > --- * RIOT 2015.12 * > --- >

[riot-devel] Wind in our sails?

Hi everyone, here's what some people say looking back at 2015 [1]. If what is stated there is true, it may be one more hint we're on good tracks at all levels, even license-wise? Cheers, Emmanuel [1] http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-and-open-source-have-won-get-over-it/

[riot-devel] Low-power WAN

Hi everyone, while so far most of us here are interested in shorter range radios (as far as I know), there is this recent push towards low-power long-range technologies of various types. I stumbled over this blunt, high-level survey [1] of the current state of affairs in that domain, I thought it

Re: [riot-devel] Task Forces

kas...@schleiser.de> wrote: > Hey, > > On 11/19/15 16:50, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > - would Kaspar agree he was the shepherd of the timers task force? > > yes. > > Kaspar > ___ > devel mailing list > devel@riot-os.org &g

Re: [riot-devel] Task Forces

! > > Sounds like a sensible proposal to me. > > Cheers, > Oleg > > Am Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:51:36PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Baccelli: > > +1 here too. > > I think it is also important to describe to malloc and free :) > > I mean how to: > > > > 1 - c

Re: [riot-devel] Task Forces

+1 here too. I think it is also important to describe to malloc and free :) I mean how to: 1 - create a new task force (hopefully we have a lot more to come!) 2 - join/ping/revive an existing task force (e.g. OTA is somewhat dormant) 3 - dissolve an existing task force For creating: how about,

Re: [riot-devel] Disabled Strider (1 and 2)

+1 for disabling (unless Philipp yells very loud now ;) On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Hi, > > since the results of both Strider CI systems are currently of very limited > use and confusing for many people, I decided to deactivate them for now. If >

Re: [riot-devel] module documentation

Hi there, I agree that some text would be very helpful. Actually, the plan was to indeed provide some such text very soon, right Martine? Best, Emmanuel On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hey Martine, > > On 11/17/15 09:18, Martine Lenders wrote: >

Re: [riot-devel] Documentation How-To

Hi there, I don't know about 101 or no 101 (although maybe it's too american centric an expression, indeed, so I'd vote for another title). But I do support some explicit policy as to how to contribute documentation to RIOT. The hope is that it will diminish duplicate documentation, and thus

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Release 2015.09

gt; wrote: > >> wohoooah! >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Emmanuel Baccelli <emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr> >> To: RIOT OS kernel developers <devel@riot-os.org> >> Sent: Mo., 05 Okt. 2015 23:11 >> Subject: Re: [riot-d

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Release 2015.09

YAY! On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Martine Lenders wrote: > \o/ finally! > > /goes to bed > Am 05.10.2015 22:17 schrieb "Oleg Hahm" : > >> Dear RIOT developers and users, >> >> it has been a long and rocky road, but thanks to the marvellous >>

  1   2   >