Hi,
> I am a relatively new user to Riot OS. I understand that this type of
> proposal from a new user may be frowned upon or unwarranted. So I understand
> if this idea gets shot down and closed. However, I would like to see if there
> is any interest in using Gitter rather than freednode and
hould
be optimized by the compiler and the modern linker should remove the
unused functions. I pour a little oil into the fire: some developer overdo it
with the macros and the driver (also other) sources look like "a macro-monster
has puked on the display"
Am 15.06.2016 um 14:35 schrieb Martine Lenders:
Hi,
Should we rathe change to skype & co?
Cheers,
Martine
+1
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
] http://www.phytec.de/produkt/internet-of-things/phystick-kw2x/
[2] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/3890
Cheers,
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
:-)
About RNDIS:
- why should RIOT supports a Microsoft proprietary protocol?
- why not CDC-ECM or CDC-EEM ?
Cheers,
[1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/3890
[2] https://github.com/jfischer-phytec-iot/RIOT/tree/test%40cdc-ecm
--
Johann Fischer
/btusb.c
[4] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/labels/Newbie-Task-Candidate
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/pull/3890#issuecomment-154106351
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-v.org/software/c++/linus
And that is also interesting:
http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/coders-at-work
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/mailman/listinfo/devel
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman
?
Regards
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
%3A-Phytec-phyWAVE-KW22
[2]
http://www.phytec.de/de/produkte/internet-of-things/evaluierungskit/produktdetails/p/iot-enablement-kit.html
Best regards
Johann Fischer
Am 29.05.2015 um 05:19 schrieb Alexander Talavari:
Hello,
As part of my MScThesis i will be devoloping on RIOT and i was interest
:
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2328
From my point of view, best option is to have one common
kinetis_family directory with all driver regardless of the family.
Jozef
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
http://lists.riot
HAL and I think more of them will
make RIOT much better :-).
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
or
improvements back.
Best regards
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
the code base.
If so how, and at which stage (short, mid long term), and how bad? Is it
worse the risks of too slow adoption if we stay with LGPL? This is what we
really have to gauge now.
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
http
15 matches
Mail list logo