Re: [riot-devel] [alex.ar...@gmail.com: Re: [Roll] Looking for Linux implementation of RPL for interop testing]
Hello, - Known as linux-rpl [0]. In my opinion there is still much stuff to do there for bringing this stuff mainline. There is a blog article [1] about somebody who tested it with contiki nodes and it seems basically to work with limitations. I moved RPL code to new bluetooth-next branch, it's on GitHub [0]. I also added dummy handler for RPL Option for IPv6 Hop-by-Hop header. It allows multihop operation with RPL nodes. Description on blogger [1]. Best Regards Maciej Wasilak [0] https://github.com/siskin/bluetooth-next [1] http://sixpinetrees.blogspot.com/2015/04/linux-rpl-router-improvements.html ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [riot-devel] Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread, Ipso Alliance
Hello Baptiste! 2015-03-20 9:02 GMT+01:00 Baptiste Clenet bapcle...@gmail.com: I agree with you about IETF protocols, everybody should use them and it will make communication easier. In my opinion IETF protocols have the most potential to become de facto standards. However IETF doesn't develop high level standards (above application level). They released CoAP, but they won't define structure of resources, and contents of messages. You may check OMA LWM2M [1] - it's heavilly based on IETF standards and compatible with IPSO. It's more suited for GSM devices though. Best Regards Maciej Wasilak [1] http://technical.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/technical-information/release-program/current-releases/oma-lightweightm2m-v1-0 ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
