Re: [riot-devel] Hack'N'ACK, January 2016

2016-01-23 Thread Oleg Hahm
Hi Martine, thanks for the reminder! Cheers, Oleg On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 01:48:14PM +0100, Martine Lenders wrote: > Hi, > Kind reminder to all to use the weekend (or Monday and Tuesday) to prepare > the PRs for the Hack'n'ACK. > > Cheers, > Martine > > 2016-01-18 16:01 GMT+01:00 Martine

Re: [riot-devel] Hack'N'ACK, January 2016

2016-01-23 Thread Martine Lenders
Hi, Kind reminder to all to use the weekend (or Monday and Tuesday) to prepare the PRs for the Hack'n'ACK. Cheers, Martine 2016-01-18 16:01 GMT+01:00 Martine Lenders : > Hi Cenk, > > I also want to add and stress that we should make proper use of > the "Hack'n'ACK

Re: [riot-devel] Hack'N'ACK, January 2016

2016-01-18 Thread Martine Lenders
Hi Cenk, > I also want to add and stress that we should make proper use of the "Hack'n'ACK Candidate" label in GitHub to find those "5-10" PRs during the Hack'n'ACK. I kind of got the feeling that this label only is applied to PRs that are easy to review. I'm not sure how the usage of this label

[riot-devel] Hack'N'ACK, January 2016

2016-01-18 Thread Martine Lenders
Hi, just a kind reminder that next week it is Hack'n'ACK time again and (on the time I write this Mail) we have 213 (!) open Pull Requests. I already discussed locally here in Berlin with some colleagues, how we can maybe optimize the Hack'n'ACK to get more Pull Requests merged or closed this

Re: [riot-devel] Hack'N'ACK, January 2016

2016-01-18 Thread Cenk Gündogan
Hello Martine, I also want to add and stress that we should make proper use of the "Hack'n'ACK Candidate" label in GitHub to find those "5-10" PRs during the Hack'n'ACK. In general, I also think that there is room for optimization regarding the way we deal with Hack'n'ACKs currently and I like