Hi,
now that we start to get in IEEE 802.15.4/6LoWPAN territory with
netdev/netapi [1-3] I wonder if it makes sense to not have 2
(16-bit/64-bit) but 3 addressing modes:

* 16-bit short address
* 32-bit (16-bit PAN ID + 16-bit short address) as originally introduced to
RIOT, but somehow ignored over since then in [4]
* 64-bit long address.

As far as I read [5], there is not really any use-case for PAN ID + long
address.

The API proposed in netdev/netapi need no change for this. It's rather a
question what the drivers and 6LoWPAN should accept and generate as
addressing formats for packets.

Tell me what you think.

Cheers,
Martine

[1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2614
[2] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2627
[3] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2695
[4] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/925
[5] http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.15.4-2011.pdf
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to