Re: [riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

2016-10-26 Thread Anon Anonymous 
Hello!

Yes. It's SX1276 + MCU modules based on STM32L151 devices. Link with some
pictures and description: http://unwds.com/en/products-en/unwired-range
We're already implemented SX1276 support with our custom networking layer
on top of the SX1276 driver.
Previously it was supposed to use Contiki OS, but then we're decided to put
RIOT OS on them because IMHO it's great project that evolving fast and with
active community.

2016-10-26 18:39 GMT+03:00 Emmanuel Baccelli :

> Hello again Cr0s,
>
> Great. I was asking this because some RIOTers in Chile are about to start
> to port LoRaWAN to RIOT, hence your SX1276 driver would be great for
> them, I guess.
>
> Looking forward to your PR!
>
> One last question: are you using your SX1276 on a STM32L1 of some sort?
>
> Cheers
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Anon Anonymous 
> wrote:
>
>> Good day to all RIOT folks.
>>
>> Thank you guys for interesting that topic! And thanks to Akshay for the
>> donation proposal, but I, personally, has a plenty of sx1276-based modules
>> done by my company and they're work well so far.
>>
>> I finished my sx1276 driver and need about a week to port it onto newest
>> version of RIOT due to some API changes and to fix some possible issues
>> with that. On LoRaWAN support, it's planned in near future and will be
>> implemented soon or later, of course, but if somebody needs a point to
>> start with - just wait for my driver's PR and use it to implement LoRaWAN
>> above it.
>>
>> To summarize:
>> 1. SX1276 support is done and used in production as well, so the PR in
>> RIOT it's just a matter of time. Hopefully I will do this until the end of
>> a week.
>> 2. LoRaWAN layer isn't done by me personally, but if somebody is willing
>> to start on this direction, my SX1276 driver that will be published soon is
>> good starting point
>>
>> 2016-06-20 16:20 GMT+03:00 Anon Anonymous :
>>
>>> Hi, RIOTers!
>>>
>>> After a couple of months I've finished a Semtech's SX1276 LoRa
>>> transceiver driver (physical level, RX and TX) under RIOT (pull request
>>> coming soon!) and the next step is a LoRaWAN MAC level implementation.
>>>
>>> My question is:
>>> Which RIOT interfaces should I choose to implement next to introduce
>>> LoRaWAN MAC level as seamlessly as possible into existing RIOT's networking
>>> stacks?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for any help and clarifications!
>>>
>>> Best regards.
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@riot-os.org
>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

2016-10-26 Thread Emmanuel Baccelli 
Hello again Cr0s,

Great. I was asking this because some RIOTers in Chile are about to start
to port LoRaWAN to RIOT, hence your SX1276 driver would be great for them,
I guess.

Looking forward to your PR!

One last question: are you using your SX1276 on a STM32L1 of some sort?

Cheers

Emmanuel

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Anon Anonymous 
wrote:

> Good day to all RIOT folks.
>
> Thank you guys for interesting that topic! And thanks to Akshay for the
> donation proposal, but I, personally, has a plenty of sx1276-based modules
> done by my company and they're work well so far.
>
> I finished my sx1276 driver and need about a week to port it onto newest
> version of RIOT due to some API changes and to fix some possible issues
> with that. On LoRaWAN support, it's planned in near future and will be
> implemented soon or later, of course, but if somebody needs a point to
> start with - just wait for my driver's PR and use it to implement LoRaWAN
> above it.
>
> To summarize:
> 1. SX1276 support is done and used in production as well, so the PR in
> RIOT it's just a matter of time. Hopefully I will do this until the end of
> a week.
> 2. LoRaWAN layer isn't done by me personally, but if somebody is willing
> to start on this direction, my SX1276 driver that will be published soon is
> good starting point
>
> 2016-06-20 16:20 GMT+03:00 Anon Anonymous :
>
>> Hi, RIOTers!
>>
>> After a couple of months I've finished a Semtech's SX1276 LoRa
>> transceiver driver (physical level, RX and TX) under RIOT (pull request
>> coming soon!) and the next step is a LoRaWAN MAC level implementation.
>>
>> My question is:
>> Which RIOT interfaces should I choose to implement next to introduce
>> LoRaWAN MAC level as seamlessly as possible into existing RIOT's networking
>> stacks?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any help and clarifications!
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

2016-10-26 Thread Anon Anonymous 
Good day to all RIOT folks.

Thank you guys for interesting that topic! And thanks to Akshay for the
donation proposal, but I, personally, has a plenty of sx1276-based modules
done by my company and they're work well so far.

I finished my sx1276 driver and need about a week to port it onto newest
version of RIOT due to some API changes and to fix some possible issues
with that. On LoRaWAN support, it's planned in near future and will be
implemented soon or later, of course, but if somebody needs a point to
start with - just wait for my driver's PR and use it to implement LoRaWAN
above it.

To summarize:
1. SX1276 support is done and used in production as well, so the PR in RIOT
it's just a matter of time. Hopefully I will do this until the end of a
week.
2. LoRaWAN layer isn't done by me personally, but if somebody is willing to
start on this direction, my SX1276 driver that will be published soon is
good starting point

2016-06-20 16:20 GMT+03:00 Anon Anonymous :

> Hi, RIOTers!
>
> After a couple of months I've finished a Semtech's SX1276 LoRa transceiver
> driver (physical level, RX and TX) under RIOT (pull request coming soon!)
> and the next step is a LoRaWAN MAC level implementation.
>
> My question is:
> Which RIOT interfaces should I choose to implement next to introduce
> LoRaWAN MAC level as seamlessly as possible into existing RIOT's networking
> stacks?
>
> Thanks in advance for any help and clarifications!
>
> Best regards.
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

2016-10-26 Thread Akshay Mishra 
I am willing to donate 2 LoRa transceiver modules towards this effort if
there is somebody working on it. We have our own modules on LoRa and it is
without any MCU onboard.

Warm Regards,
Akshay

*Akshay Mishra*
*Chief Technology Officer*
GSM: +91 98693 21611
Skype: mishrakshay
Office: +91 22 2500 3488

On 26 October 2016 at 20:00, Emmanuel Baccelli 
wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> Any news on this?
> Is there a branch available somewhere?
>
> Best,
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Anon Anonymous 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, RIOTers!
>>
>> After a couple of months I've finished a Semtech's SX1276 LoRa
>> transceiver driver (physical level, RX and TX) under RIOT (pull request
>> coming soon!) and the next step is a LoRaWAN MAC level implementation.
>>
>> My question is:
>> Which RIOT interfaces should I choose to implement next to introduce
>> LoRaWAN MAC level as seamlessly as possible into existing RIOT's networking
>> stacks?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any help and clarifications!
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@riot-os.org
>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

2016-10-26 Thread Emmanuel Baccelli 
Hi there,

Any news on this?
Is there a branch available somewhere?

Best,

Emmanuel

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Anon Anonymous 
wrote:

> Hi, RIOTers!
>
> After a couple of months I've finished a Semtech's SX1276 LoRa transceiver
> driver (physical level, RX and TX) under RIOT (pull request coming soon!)
> and the next step is a LoRaWAN MAC level implementation.
>
> My question is:
> Which RIOT interfaces should I choose to implement next to introduce
> LoRaWAN MAC level as seamlessly as possible into existing RIOT's networking
> stacks?
>
> Thanks in advance for any help and clarifications!
>
> Best regards.
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

2016-06-20 Thread Peter Kietzmann 

Hi anonymous,

great :-)! I assume you're using a development board, dev kit or 
something. Would you disclose which one it is (in case...)?


Best
Peter




Am 20.06.2016 um 16:25 schrieb Kaspar Schleiser:

Hey anonymous,

On 06/20/2016 03:20 PM, Anon Anonymous wrote:

After a couple of months I've finished a Semtech's SX1276 LoRa
transceiver driver (physical level, RX and TX) under RIOT (pull request
coming soon!) and the next step is a LoRaWAN MAC level implementation.


Awesome! looking forward.


My question is:
Which RIOT interfaces should I choose to implement next to introduce
LoRaWAN MAC level as seamlessly as possible into existing RIOT's
networking stacks?


If the MAC is mostly stateless (doesn't need dynamic buffering), it
might make sense to model it as a netdev2 layer on top of raw LoRa.
Is there a use case for using LoRa without the MAC?

Kaspar
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



--
Peter Kietzmann

Hamburg University of Applied Sciences
Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group
Berliner Tor 7, 20099 Hamburg, Germany
Fon: +49-40-42875-8426
Web: http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

2016-06-20 Thread Kaspar Schleiser 
Hey anonymous,

On 06/20/2016 03:20 PM, Anon Anonymous wrote:
> After a couple of months I've finished a Semtech's SX1276 LoRa
> transceiver driver (physical level, RX and TX) under RIOT (pull request
> coming soon!) and the next step is a LoRaWAN MAC level implementation.

Awesome! looking forward.

> My question is:
> Which RIOT interfaces should I choose to implement next to introduce
> LoRaWAN MAC level as seamlessly as possible into existing RIOT's
> networking stacks?

If the MAC is mostly stateless (doesn't need dynamic buffering), it
might make sense to model it as a netdev2 layer on top of raw LoRa.
Is there a use case for using LoRa without the MAC?

Kaspar
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

2016-06-20 Thread Anon Anonymous 
Hi, RIOTers!

After a couple of months I've finished a Semtech's SX1276 LoRa transceiver
driver (physical level, RX and TX) under RIOT (pull request coming soon!)
and the next step is a LoRaWAN MAC level implementation.

My question is:
Which RIOT interfaces should I choose to implement next to introduce
LoRaWAN MAC level as seamlessly as possible into existing RIOT's networking
stacks?

Thanks in advance for any help and clarifications!

Best regards.
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel