Hi all,
thank you Kaspar for putting up this question. I think there are many more
things that should be discussed about timers on this abstract conceptual
level
and there is a need to somehow document what we agreed on (maybe an RDM
at some
point?).
> I think everyone agrees that if a relati
> Am 26.11.2019 um 20:47 schrieb Kaspar Schleiser :
>
> Hi Should that be done,
> or should the conversion be implemented in a way that the 1ms timer
> behaves the same regardless of the lower timer having 1ms or 1us precision?
Hi Kaspar,
As a user/developer I would expect that sleep_ms(1) sl
Hi everyone,
I think everyone agrees that if a relative timer is set, it is expected
to run *at least* the amount of time that is specified as interval to
timer_set().
That means if now() is e.g., 0 ticks and the timer is set to wait 1
tick, the timer must trigger at 2 ticks, as even if now()==0,
