On 11/09/14 17:55, Daniel Cederman wrote:
Invalidation of entire data cache might cause data written to the stack
to get lost.
---
testsuites/smptests/smpcache01/init.c | 47 +++
testsuites/smptests/smpcache01/smpcache01.doc | 1 -
Hello,
what is the use case for the following functions:
rtems_cache_flush_multiple_data_lines_processor_set()
rtems_cache_invalidate_multiple_data_lines_processor_set()
rtems_cache_flush_entire_data_processor_set()
rtems_cache_invalidate_entire_data_processor_set()
?
Makes it sense on an
On 09/16/2014 01:49 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 16/09/14 13:42, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
Hello,
what is the use case for the following functions:
rtems_cache_flush_multiple_data_lines_processor_set()
rtems_cache_invalidate_multiple_data_lines_processor_set()
On 16/09/14 14:10, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 09/16/2014 01:49 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 16/09/14 13:42, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
Hello,
what is the use case for the following functions:
rtems_cache_flush_multiple_data_lines_processor_set()
I pushed the rest but this (#5) does not apply cleanly.
Please rebase your tree, make sure I merged the others
ok, and recut the patch..
Thanks.
--joel
On 9/15/2014 5:33 PM, Hesham ALMatary wrote:
Implement new cache functions for or1k and create new bspstart function
for or1ksim to
I am not sure what it up. Chris committed a patch that changed
the sort order to be more uniform. But your preinstall.am's don't
match.
Maybe you should try regenerating them. Perhaps they are
from before his change being committed.
$ git am /media/sf_jrs007/patches/\[PATCH\]\ or1k\ \ New\
I am converting the capture engine to remove capture tasks and use a combination
of a special capture record and data moved to the tcb to replace it. I have a
question
on the rtems_capture_switch_task method where it is using a check for dormant
state
of the current task. I spoke with Joel on
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
I am not sure what it up. Chris committed a patch that changed
the sort order to be more uniform. But your preinstall.am's don't
match.
I generated an updated one in a separate commit before (after Chris
change),
Implement new cache functions for or1k and create new bspstart function
for or1ksim to initialize instruction and data caches. Also, sim.cfg
is modified to enable/confiure cache units.
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/or1k/or1ksim/Makefile.am| 9 +-
c/src/lib/libbsp/or1k/or1ksim/preinstall.am
I don't understand this but I got it applied.
I manually edited the saved email to delete the preinstall.am
changes. I committed the rest. Then I ran bootstrap -p myself
and folded that into the rest of your patch.
It should all be committed now.
How about some new test results. :)
--joel
On
On 9/16/2014 12:54 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
I don't understand this but I got it applied.
I manually edited the saved email to delete the preinstall.am
changes. I committed the rest. Then I ran bootstrap
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 9/16/2014 12:54 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
I don't understand this but I got it applied.
I manually edited the saved email
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 9/16/2014 12:54 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
I don't understand this but I got it applied.
I manually edited the saved email
On 9/16/2014 1:34 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 9/16/2014 12:54 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
I don't understand this but I got it
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 9/16/2014 1:34 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 9/16/2014 12:54 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:47 PM,
On 9/16/2014 2:17 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 9/16/2014 1:34 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 9/16/2014 12:54 PM, Hesham Moustafa
Breakpoint 2, 0x0600 in _unalign ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0600 in _unalign ()
#1 0x0002ec4c in _RBTree_Next (
node=0x40890, dir=RBT_RIGHT)
at ../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/rbtreenext.c:35
#2 0x0002e2f4 in _RBTree_Successor (
node=0x40890)
at
Breakpoint 1, _RBTree_Next (node=0x40890, dir=RBT_RIGHT)
at ../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/rbtreenext.c:35
35 RBTree_Direction opp_dir = _RBTree_Opposite_direction( dir );
(gdb) n
36 RBTree_Node *current = node-child[ dir ];
(gdb) n
37 RBTree_Node *next = NULL;
Gedare.. cc'ed you for help in spotting an empty rbtree
in gdb. See below.
On 9/16/2014 2:45 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
Breakpoint 2, 0x0600 in _unalign ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0600 in _unalign ()
#1 0x0002ec4c in _RBTree_Next (
node=0x40890, dir=RBT_RIGHT)
at
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
Gedare.. cc'ed you for help in spotting an empty rbtree
in gdb. See below.
On 9/16/2014 2:45 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
Breakpoint 2, 0x0600 in _unalign ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0600 in _unalign ()
#1
On 17/09/2014 3:22 am, Jennifer Averett wrote:
I am converting the capture engine to remove capture tasks and use a
combination
of a special capture record and data moved to the tcb to replace it. I
have a question
on the rtems_capture_switch_task method where it is using a check for
dormant
On 9/16/2014 4:28 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 17/09/2014 3:22 am, Jennifer Averett wrote:
I am converting the capture engine to remove capture tasks and use a
combination
of a special capture record and data moved to the tcb to replace it. I
have a question
on the rtems_capture_switch_task
The JFFS2 file system can optionally use zlib as a compressor and
if this is the only reference to zlib the application will not link.
Adding -lz does not work because librtemscpu.a is added to the end of
ld's command line via the bsp_specs hack and user added libraries
appear before this.
---
On 17/09/2014 3:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Rename rtems_stdio_redirect_t to rtems_stdio_redirect since the
namespace *_t is reserved by POSIX, see also The Open Group Base
Specifications Issue 6 IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition, 2.2.2 The Name
Space.
Thanks. Please commit.
Chris
On 17/09/14 02:26, Chris Johns wrote:
The JFFS2 file system can optionally use zlib as a compressor and
if this is the only reference to zlib the application will not link.
Adding -lz does not work because librtemscpu.a is added to the end of
ld's command line via the bsp_specs hack and user
On 16/09/14 16:00, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 09/16/2014 02:23 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 16/09/14 14:10, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 09/16/2014 01:49 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 16/09/14 13:42, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
Hello,
what is the use case for the following functions:
26 matches
Mail list logo
