On 5/11/2014 6:14 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
on the latest Git master the following new tests fail on
arm/realview_pbx_a9_qemu due to a timeout after 180 seconds: top,
dl01.pre and dl02.pre.
The dl01.pre and dl02.pre are not to be run. They are the first link of
two to get a suitable set of
This is a tough problem. We have plenty of inexpensive SPI and I2C devices
to mix and match with low cost boards such as the Pi and Beaglebone, but it
could all become obsolete quickly.
If we put a bunch of SPI and I2C drivers in the RTEMS repo, then how do we
test and maintain them without
How are interactive tests being handled now? The top test will
eventually end but would come closest to being considered
interactive.
Jennifer Averett
-Original Message-
From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian
Huber
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014
---
.../lpc176x/make/custom/lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git
a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc176x/make/custom/lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg
b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc176x/make/custom/lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg
Hi
I just thought I would post a summary after the recent updates
and include all targets in one easy to track email. Overall about
50% of the architectures fail to build for some reason or another.
+ Unrecognized symbol type from a .s file
bfin (all BSPs), i386 (all BSPs), powerpc (all BSPs)
Which targets do you think this fixes?
On November 5, 2014 7:02:32 PM CST, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
Module:rtems-tools
Branch:master
Commit:b9c0a0436d387429035241d3d4d03446b6f915cf
Changeset:
On 6/11/2014 12:15 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Which targets do you think this fixes?
The i386 now builds. See my other email.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello Jennifer,
yes, there are some interactive tests in the test suite, but do we really need
new ones? Who has the time to do interactive testing?
The other interactive tests wait some seconds for user input and otherwise
exit. I think it is preferable to turn this top test into a
Hello,
I have a new item for the list:
Very desirable
==
+ Since red-black trees are now used to implement the priority queues and they
will play an important part in future SMP improvements I would like to do some
performance measurements with alternative implementations. I
