Closes #2304
---
cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/rtems/score/cpu.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/rtems/score/cpu.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/rtems/score/cpu.h
index 0be9bca..9afb381 100644
--- a/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/rtems/score/cpu.h
+++
Hi,
I would like to know what is the status of running lwIP on beaglebone
black on RTEMS. I understand that there was some considerable amount
of work already done on running lwIP on BBB. It would be really
helpful if I can get the details on what has already been done and
what are the
On 13/03/2015 7:37 pm, emanuel stiebler wrote:
On 2015-03-13 05:55, Chris Johns wrote:
Have a look in this line ...
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/tree/source-builder/sb/windows.py#n56
.. and remove line 57 and make line 58 'host_triple = build_triple' so
the host and build
On 11/03/2015 4:17 am, Richa Sehgal wrote:
I am Richa Sehgal currently pursuing Master’s at University of Illinois
Urbana Champaign, USA. I did my undergraduate from Indian Institute of
Technology Delhi (IIT-Delhi).
I am interested in contributing to the Run Time Tracing project in GSOC
2015.
On 11/03/2015 1:27 am, Karel Gardas wrote:
Yes, this is a big patch but if you do not merge it now and later
following waf work you do tree/file placement refactoring than the patch
would be even harder to merge.
I was thinking this would land in 4.12 then waf would be based off of that.
Hi,
Indeed we have it working but we only can use it with the cache disabled
because the system crashes otherway.
About what's next, I think there should be a revision of the code and
debugging in order to make it work with the cache enabled. And also see the
way of submitting it to rtems. It was
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
On 14/03/2015 12:30 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I would like to consider landing the drvmgr and pci patch-set as a
sparc-specific feature (e.g. only included in builds for sparc.)
How is this controlled or are you saying we
On 13/03/2015 7:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 12/03/15 18:41, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi
Many BSPs can link a test but don't actually have enough memory
to run the test. They will fail in the first few lines when the requested
memory for the RTEMS work area is not available. I hacked
On 14/03/2015 12:30 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I would like to consider landing the drvmgr and pci patch-set as a
sparc-specific feature (e.g. only included in builds for sparc.)
How is this controlled or are you saying we state in the release notes
this is only currently tested on SPARC BSPs ?
On March 13, 2015 6:30:40 PM CDT, Marcos Díaz
marcos.d...@tallertechnologies.com wrote:
Hi,
Indeed we have it working but we only can use it with the cache
disabled because the system crashes otherway.
This could be an MMU setup issue. A region marked cacheable that shouldn't be.
About what's
On 2015-03-13 05:55, Chris Johns wrote:
Have a look in this line ...
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/tree/source-builder/sb/windows.py#n56
.. and remove line 57 and make line 58 'host_triple = build_triple' so
the host and build names are the same by default.
If this works you
On 11/03/15 22:18, Joel Sherril wrote:
+/**
+ * @brief Benchmark Timer Value Type
+ *
+ * This type is used to contain benchmark times. The units are BSP specific.
+ */
+typedef uint32_t benchmark_timer_t;
The @brief for functions should be a complete sentence and not a headline.
--
On 13/03/15 06:04, Chris Johns wrote:
1. We need a suitable newlib snapshot to reference.
I have one pending Newlib patch, so the March snapshot would be nice.
This gives us two weeks from now to commit everything Newlib related.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address :
Merge parts of the latest sys/time.h from FreeBSD to Newlib. This has
two reasons.
1. We want to use the FreeBSD timecounters for timekeeping in RTEMS.
See also https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2271.
2. This makes the port of the network stack from FreeBSD easier.
newlib/ChangeLog
2015-03-12
On 13/03/15 11:43, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:38:12AM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
I would like to commit this patch to GCC 4.9 and 5.0.
libgomp/ChangeLog
2015-03-13 Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
* configure.tgt (*-*-rtems*): Use local-exec
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
On 11/03/2015 1:33 am, Amar Takhar wrote:
Can we come up with a plan for branching 4.11?
We need to push off any commits made that are unrelated to tickets open in
milestone 4.11 to the next release. This way any changes
On March 13, 2015 8:30:46 AM CDT, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
On 11/03/2015 1:33 am, Amar Takhar wrote:
Can we come up with a plan for branching 4.11?
We need to push off any commits made that are unrelated to
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Юрий Шевцов unge...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I right that completing Hello is just change and somehow submit lines in
samples/hello/init.c ? And how can I submit the proof, of course?)
Correct. You can send an email here with patch attached and a link to
a
Hi,
I am new to using Raspberry pi. I saw the READ ME for Raspberry pi BSP. I
have got the files stated there, except the config.txt. I also read some
steps on the Raspberry pi website regarding getting the image onto the SD
card.
Also, I do not understand what the stripping step will do. I need
19 matches
Mail list logo