Re: [PATCH v2] Avoid default RTEMS application configuration

2018-10-21 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 22/10/2018 08:13, Chris Johns wrote: On 22/10/2018 16:46, Sebastian Huber wrote: Use a test body with a proper RTEMS application configuration to avoid a dependency on the default configuration. Do not include directly since this header file is an implementation detail. Looks good. Please

Re: [PATCH v2] Avoid default RTEMS application configuration

2018-10-21 Thread Chris Johns
On 22/10/2018 16:46, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Use a test body with a proper RTEMS application configuration to avoid a > dependency on the default configuration. Do not include > directly since this header file is an > implementation detail. Looks good. Please push. Will you update libbsd and e

[PATCH v2] Avoid default RTEMS application configuration

2018-10-21 Thread Sebastian Huber
Use a test body with a proper RTEMS application configuration to avoid a dependency on the default configuration. Do not include directly since this header file is an implementation detail. Update #3551. --- rtems.py | 51 --- 1 file changed, 28 i

Re: [PATCH] Avoid default RTEMS application configuration

2018-10-21 Thread Chris Johns
On 22/10/2018 16:28, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 20/10/2018 02:04, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 19/10/18 5:47 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> - Am 18. Okt 2018 um 19:56 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: >>> On 18/10/18 6:38 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Use a test body with a proper RTEM

Re: [PATCH] Avoid default RTEMS application configuration

2018-10-21 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 20/10/2018 02:04, Chris Johns wrote: On 19/10/18 5:47 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: - Am 18. Okt 2018 um 19:56 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: On 18/10/18 6:38 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: Use a test body with a proper RTEMS application configuration to avoid a dependency on the defau

[PATCH] windows: Remove BuildRoot from all configs, add a short tmp path.

2018-10-21 Thread chrisj
From: Chris Johns Closes #3562. --- bare/config/devel/texane-stlink-1.cfg | 1 - rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-4-1.cfg | 1 - .../rtems-nios2-gcc-4.1-newlib-1.19.0-1.cfg | 1 - rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-common-1.cfg | 1 - rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-git-1.cfg

Re: RFC: Value of New Section on Tools Build Time Expectations

2018-10-21 Thread Chris Johns
On 22/10/2018 09:11, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 2:16 PM Christian Mauderer > wrote: > Am 21.10.18 um 19:07 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > > Hi > > > > I am in the middle of reconfiguring my old (~2013 i7) laptop as an email > > and remot

Re: RFC: Value of New Section on Tools Build Time Expectations

2018-10-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 2:16 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > Am 21.10.18 um 19:07 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > > Hi > > > > I am in the middle of reconfiguring my old (~2013 i7) laptop as an email > > and remote workstation for home. Between helping students and doing two > > Kick Starts in the past 6

Re: RFC: Value of New Section on Tools Build Time Expectations

2018-10-21 Thread Christian Mauderer
Am 21.10.18 um 19:07 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > Hi > > I am in the middle of reconfiguring my old (~2013 i7) laptop as an email > and remote workstation for home. Between helping students and doing two > Kick Starts in the past 6 weeks, VM configuration, disk space > expectations, and time required

RFC: Value of New Section on Tools Build Time Expectations

2018-10-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi I am in the middle of reconfiguring my old (~2013 i7) laptop as an email and remote workstation for home. Between helping students and doing two Kick Starts in the past 6 weeks, VM configuration, disk space expectations, and time required to build the tools seem to be a topic that needs to be a